دورية أكاديمية

Taxanes Versus Androgen Receptor Therapy as Second-Line Treatment for Castrate-Resistant Metastatic Prostate Cancer After First-Line Androgen Receptor Therapy.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Taxanes Versus Androgen Receptor Therapy as Second-Line Treatment for Castrate-Resistant Metastatic Prostate Cancer After First-Line Androgen Receptor Therapy.
المؤلفون: Broyelle, Antonin, Delanoy, Nicolas, Bimbai, André-Michel, Le Deley, Marie-Cécile, Penel, Nicolas, Villers, Arnauld, Lebellec, Loïc, Oudard, Stéphane
المصدر: Clinical Genitourinary Cancer; Jun2023, Vol. 21 Issue 3, p349-356, 10p
مصطلحات موضوعية: ANDROGEN receptors, CASTRATION-resistant prostate cancer, ABIRATERONE acetate, PROGRESSION-free survival, DOCETAXEL
مستخلص: The optimal therapeutic sequence for metastatic castrate-resistance prostate cancer is still debated. We included all consecutive chemo-naive mCRPC patients who have received first-line ART in two hospitals in France. In the first-line setting, there was no significant difference between abiraterone and enzalutamide. In the second-line setting, taxanes was superior to androgen-receptor therapy (HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.41-0.96, P = .034). Background: The optimal therapeutic sequence for metastatic castrate-resistance prostate cancer (mCRPC) is still debated. This study aimed to compare activity of taxanes (TAX) versus that of androgen-receptor therapy (ART) in men with mCRPC treated with first-line ART. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study included all consecutive chemo-naive mCRPC patients who have received first-line ART treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients treated with second-line ART or TAX. Results: Overall, 175 patients treated with first-line enzalutamide (ENZA, n = 75) or abiraterone (ABI, n = 100) were evaluated. Among them, 69 (39%) and 30 (17%) patients received second-line TAX and ART, respectively, while 76 (43%) patients did not receive further treatment. From the start of first-line therapy, the median PFS and OS were 13 months (95% CI: 11-15) and 34 months (95% CI: 29-39), respectively, without any significant difference between ENZA and ABI. From the start of second-line therapy, the median PFS and OS were 6 months (95% CI: 5-7) and 18 months (95% CI: 14-21), respectively. Compared with ART, docetaxel was associated with significantly higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA, = 50%) (29% vs. 0%, P < .001) and radiological responses (21% vs. 0%, P < .001). PFS was longer in TAX than in ART (6.7 months vs. 4 months, HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.41-0.96, P = .034), but there was no significant difference in OS (19 months vs. 12 months, P = .1). After propensity score adjustment, PFS (P = .2) and OS (P = .1) were similar between second-line TAX and ART. Conclusion: In the second-line setting, TAX provides higher PSA and radiological responses than does ART for mCRPC patients who received first-line ART, but the PFS and OS are similar. This study provides new elements to help deciding the best treatment sequence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Clinical Genitourinary Cancer is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:15587673
DOI:10.1016/j.clgc.2023.02.006