التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
An improved estimate of daily precipitation from the ERA5 reanalysis. |
| المؤلفون: |
Lavers, David A., Hersbach, Hans, Rodwell, Mark J., Simmons, Adrian |
| المصدر: |
Atmospheric Science Letters (John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ); Mar2024, Vol. 25 Issue 3, p1-8, 8p |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
PRECIPITATION forecasting, ERROR probability, HYDROLOGIC cycle, CLIMATE change |
| People: |
COPERNICUS, Nicolaus, 1473-1543 |
| مستخلص: |
Precipitation is an essential climate variable and a fundamental part of the global water cycle. Given its importance to society, precipitation is often assessed in climate monitoring activities, such as in those led by the Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S). To undertake these activities, C3S predominantly uses ERA5 reanalysis precipitation. Research has shown that short‐range forecasts for precipitation made from this reanalysis can provide valuable estimates of the actual (observed) precipitation in extratropical regions but can be less useful in the tropics. While some of these limitations will be reduced with future reanalyses because of the latest advancements, there is potentially a more immediate way to improve the precipitation estimate. This is to use the precipitation modelled in the Four‐Dimensional Variational (4D‐Var) data assimilation window of the reanalysis, and it is the aim of this study to evaluate this approach. Using observed 24‐h precipitation accumulations at 5637 stations from 2001 to 2020, results show that smaller root‐mean‐square errors (RMSEs) and mean absolute errors are generally found by using the ERA5 4D‐Var precipitation. For example, for all available days from 2001 to 2020, 87.5% of stations have smaller RMSEs. These improvements are driven by reduced random errors in the 4D‐Var precipitation because it is better constrained by observations, which are themselves sensitive to or influence precipitation. However, there are regions (e.g., Europe) where larger biases occur, and via the decomposition of the Stable Equitable Error in Probability Space score, this is shown to be because the 4D‐Var precipitation has a wetter bias on 'dry' days than the standard ERA5 short‐range forecasts. The findings also highlight that the 4D‐Var precipitation does improve the discrimination of 'heavy' observed events. In conclusion, an improved ERA5 precipitation estimate is largely obtainable, and these results could prove useful for C3S activities and for future reanalyses, including ERA6. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Atmospheric Science Letters (John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ) is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |
Full Text Finder