التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Cost‐Effectiveness of Surgical Weight‐Loss Interventions for Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis and Class III Obesity. |
| المؤلفون: |
Kostic, Aleksandra M., Leifer, Valia P., Gong, Yusi, Robinson, Malcolm K., Collins, Jamie E., Neogi, Tuhina, Messier, Stephen P., Hunter, David J., Selzer, Faith, Suter, Lisa G., Katz, Jeffrey N., Losina, Elena |
| المصدر: |
Arthritis Care & Research; Mar2023, Vol. 75 Issue 3, p491-500, 10p |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
GASTRIC bypass, KNEE osteoarthritis, TOTAL knee replacement, COST effectiveness, SLEEVE gastrectomy, KNEE pain |
| مستخلص: |
Objective: Class III obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥40 kg/m2) is associated with worse knee pain and total knee replacement (TKR) outcomes. Because bariatric surgery yields sustainable weight loss for individuals with BMI ≥40 kg/m2, our objective was to establish the value of Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in conjunction with usual care for knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients with BMI ≥40 kg/m2. Methods: We used the Osteoarthritis Policy model to assess long‐term clinical benefits, costs, and cost‐effectiveness of RYGB and LSG. We derived model inputs for efficacy, costs, and complications associated with these treatments from published data. Primary outcomes included quality‐adjusted life‐years (QALYs), lifetime costs, and incremental cost‐effectiveness ratios (ICERs), all discounted at 3%/year. This analysis was conducted from a health care sector perspective. We performed sensitivity analyses to evaluate uncertainty in input parameters. Results: The usual care + RYGB strategy increased the quality‐adjusted life expectancy by 1.35 years and lifetime costs by $7,209, compared to usual care alone (ICER = $5,300/QALY). The usual care + LSG strategy yielded less benefit than usual care + RYGB and was dominated. Relative to usual care alone, both usual care + RYGB and usual care + LSG reduced opioid use from 13% to 4%, and increased TKR usage from 30% to 50% and 41%, respectively. For cohorts with BMI between 38 and 41 kg/m2, usual care + LSG dominated usual care + RYGB. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, at a willingness‐to‐pay threshold of $50,000/QALY, usual care + RYGB and usual care + LSG were cost‐effective in 70% and 30% of iterations, respectively. Conclusion: RYGB offers good value among knee OA patients with BMI ≥40 kg/m2, while LSG may provide good value among those with BMI between 35 and 41 kg/m2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Arthritis Care & Research is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |
Full Text Finder