التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Effects of dexmedetomidine on evoked potentials in spinal surgery under combined intravenous inhalation anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial. |
| المؤلفون: |
Jiang, Xinyu, Tang, Xiaoning, Liu, Shaoquan, Liu, Ling |
| المصدر: |
BMC Anesthesiology; 1/31/2023, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p1-10, 10p |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
SPINAL surgery, EVOKED potentials (Electrophysiology), INTRAVENOUS anesthesia, DRUG efficacy, KRUSKAL-Wallis Test, HYPERTENSION, PROPOFOL, INHALATION anesthesia, ACADEMIC medical centers, NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, NEUROSURGERY, ONE-way analysis of variance, SURGERY, PATIENTS, FISHER exact test, IMIDAZOLES, RANDOMIZED controlled trials, ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, DESFLURANE, DESCRIPTIVE statistics, CHI-squared test, STATISTICAL sampling, DATA analysis software, INTRAOPERATIVE monitoring, REMIFENTANIL, ADULTS |
| مصطلحات جغرافية: |
CHINA |
| مستخلص: |
Objective: We aimed to investigate the effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine (Dex) on evoked potentials in adult patients undergoing spinal surgery under intravenous anesthesia with low-concentration desflurane. Methods: Ninety patients were divided into three groups at random. To maintain anesthesia in the control group (group C), desflurane 0.3 MAC (minimal alveolar concentration), propofol, and remifentanil were administered. Dex (0.5 μg·kg−1) was injected for 10 min as a loading dose in the low-dose Dex group (group DL), then adjusted to 0.2 μg·kg−1·h−1 until the operation was completed. Dex (1 μg·kg−1) was injected for 10 min as a loading dose in the high-dose Dex group (group DH), then adjusted to 0.7 μg·kg−1·h−1 until the operation was completed. The additional medications were similar to those given to group C. The perioperative hemodynamics, body temperature, intraoperative drug dosages, fluid volume, urine volume, blood loss, the latency and amplitude of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) at four different time points, the incidence of positive cases of SEPs and transcranial motor evoked potentials (tcMEPs), and perioperative adverse reactions were all recorded. Results: Data from 79 patients were analyzed. The MAP measured at points T2-T4 in group DH was higher than at corresponding points in group C (P < 0.05). The MAP at point T4 in group DL was higher than at corresponding points in group C (P < 0.05). The remifentanil dosage in group DH was significantly lower than in group C (P = 0.015). The fluid volume in group DL was significantly lower than in group C (P = 0.009). There were no significant differences among the three groups in the amplitude and latency of SEP at different time points, nor in the incidence of warning SEP signals. The incidence of positive tcMEP signals did not differ significantly between groups C and DL (P > 0.05), but was significantly higher in group DH than in groups DL (P < 0.05) or C (P < 0.05). The incidence of intraoperative hypertension was significantly higher in group DH than in group C (P = 0.017). Conclusions: Low-dose Dex has no effect on the SEPs and tcMEPs monitoring during spinal surgery. High-dose Dex has no effect on SEPs monitoring, but it may increase the rate of false positive tcMEPs signals and the incidence of intraoperative hypertension. Trial registration: This study has completed the registration of the Chinese Clinical Trial Center at 11/09/2020 with the registration number ChiCTR2000038154. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of BMC Anesthesiology is the property of BioMed Central and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |
Full Text Finder