دورية أكاديمية

Classical-Keynesian Political Economy, not Neoclassical Economics, is the Economic Theory of the Future.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Classical-Keynesian Political Economy, not Neoclassical Economics, is the Economic Theory of the Future.
المؤلفون: Bortis, Heinrich
المصدر: Review of Political Economy; Jan2023, Vol. 35 Issue 1, p65-97, 33p
مصطلحات موضوعية: SOCIAL theory, INCOME inequality, NEOCLASSICAL school of economics, BALANCE of payments, VALUE (Economics), SOCIAL values, EMPLOYMENT policy, SOCIALISM
People: KEYNES, John Maynard, 1883-1946, SRAFFA, Piero, 1898-1983
مستخلص: This article implies that the time is ripe for a new paradigm in economic theory comprising classical (Ricardian) and Keynesian elements of analysis. The central Section Five presents the basic equations of classical-Keynesian political economy, the price and the quantity equation, based on three constitutive principles: the classical labour value and surplus principles and the Keynesian principle of effective demand. Subsequently, two employment mechanisms implied in the super-multiplier relation, the classical-Keynesian quantity equation, are mentioned, the internal and the external employment mechanism. Section Seven provides an analysis of the actual situation on the basis of the external employment mechanism, associated with cumulative processes of increasing disequilibria and inequalities. Given this, it ought to be replaced by the internal employment mechanism, allowing for Keynesian employment and distribution policies (Section Eight). However, the internal mechanism can only be implemented if a new world economic order is brought about, based upon a supranational currency, that is, Keynes's bancor, to ensure balance of current account equilibria worldwide. Section Ten sets forth Keynes's social liberalism, the social philosophy underlying classical-Keynesian political economy, the fundamental social ethical value of which is the Common Good. Social Liberalism thus emerges as the alternative to Capitalism and Socialism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Review of Political Economy is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:09538259
DOI:10.1080/09538259.2022.2063512