دورية أكاديمية

Subacromial decompression versus diagnostic arthroscopy for shoulder impingement: a 5-year follow-up of a randomised, placebo surgery controlled clinical trial.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Subacromial decompression versus diagnostic arthroscopy for shoulder impingement: a 5-year follow-up of a randomised, placebo surgery controlled clinical trial.
المؤلفون: Paavola, Mika, Kanto, Kari, Ranstam, Jonas, Malmivaara, Antti, Inkinen, Jari, Kalske, Juha, Savolainen, Vesa, Sinisaari, Ilkka, Taimela, Simo, Järvinen, Teppo L., Finnish Shoulder Impingement Arthroscopy Controlled Trial (FIMPACT) Investigators
المصدر: British Journal of Sports Medicine; 1/15/2021, Vol. 55 Issue 2, p99-107, 9p
مصطلحات موضوعية: SHOULDER exercises, ARTHROSCOPY, SHOULDER disorders, EXERCISE therapy, PLACEBOS, CLINICAL trials, SHOULDER pain, RESEARCH, ANALYSIS of variance, PAIN measurement, SHOULDER injuries, TIME, RESEARCH methodology, SELF-evaluation, SURGICAL decompression, MEDICAL cooperation, EVALUATION research, TREATMENT effectiveness, COMPARATIVE studies, RANDOMIZED controlled trials, BLIND experiment, LONGITUDINAL method, HEALTH self-care
مصطلحات جغرافية: FINLAND
مستخلص: Objectives: To assess the long-term efficacy of arthroscopic subacromial decompression (ASD) by comparing it with diagnostic arthroscopy (primary comparison), a placebo surgical intervention, and with a non-operative alternative, exercise therapy (secondary comparison).Methods: We conducted a multicentre, three group, randomised, controlled superiority trial. We included 210 patients aged 35-65 years, who had symptoms consistent with shoulder impingement syndrome for more than 3 months. 175 participants (83%) completed the 5 years follow-up. Patient enrolment began on 1 February 2005 and the 5-year follow-up was completed by 10 October 2018. The two primary outcomes were shoulder pain at rest and on arm activity measured with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Minimally important difference (MID) was set at 15. We used a mixed-model repeated measurements analysis of variance with participant as a random factor, the baseline value as a covariate and assuming a covariance structure with compound symmetry.Results: In the primary intention to treat analysis (ASD vs diagnostic arthroscopy), there were no between-group differences that exceeded the MID for the primary outcomes at 5 years: the mean difference between groups (ASD minus diagnostic arthroscopy) in pain VAS were -2.0 (95% CI -8.5 to 4.6; p=0.56) at rest and -8.0 (-17.3 to 1.3; p=0.093) on arm activity. There were no between-group differences in the secondary outcomes or adverse events that exceeded the MID. In our secondary comparison (ASD vs exercise therapy), the mean differences between groups (ASD minus exercise therapy) in pain VAS were 1.0 (-5.6 to 7.6; p=0.77) at rest and -3.9 (-12.8 to 5.1; p=0.40) on arm activity. There were no significant between-group differences for the secondary outcomes or adverse events.Conclusions: ASD provided no benefit over diagnostic arthroscopy (or exercise therapy) at 5 years for patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of British Journal of Sports Medicine is the property of BMJ Publishing Group and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:03063674
DOI:10.1136/bjsports-2020-102216