دورية أكاديمية

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA and Pro Core biopsy in sampling pancreatic and intra-abdominal masses.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA and Pro Core biopsy in sampling pancreatic and intra-abdominal masses.
المؤلفون: Dwyer, Jessica, Pantanowitz, Liron, Ohori, N. Paul, Pai, Reetesh K., Vrbin, Colleen, Brand, Randall E., Monaco, Sara E.
المصدر: Cancer Cytopathology; Feb2016, Vol. 124 Issue 2, p110-121, 13p
مستخلص: BACKGROUND ProCore fine-needle biopsy (FNB) was introduced to improve the diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) sampling. The aim of this study was to evaluate EUS-guided sampling of intra-abdominal masses and compare the diagnostic utility of conventional EUS-FNA and ProCore FNB. METHODS EUS-guided biopsy samples (FNA and/or EchoTip ProCore FNB) were retrospectively retrieved over the course of 23 months. Clinical findings, pathology reports, and available histological materials were reviewed. All cell blocks were reviewed, and their cellularity was scored (range, 0-3). RESULTS Fifty-six masses from 58 cases were acquired, and they included 40 pancreatic sites and 16 other intra-abdominal sites. Among the 31 FNB-only cases, 71% were satisfactory, 65% were positive for malignancy at the time of final diagnosis, and their cell blocks were moderately cellular. For the cases with both FNB and FNA performed, more FNB samples than FNA samples were satisfactory (83% vs 76%) and were positive for malignancy (65% vs 48%) at final diagnosis, and the former had more cellular cell blocks (mean score, 1.58 vs 1.29); however, the differences were not statistically significant. Significantly more FNB samples were used for immunostains (48% vs 10%; P = .005). CONCLUSIONS These data show that a wide variety of intra-abdominal masses were amenable to sampling by ProCore FNB. In this subset of cases with prior/concurrent indeterminate FNAs, FNB showed slightly better diagnostic yield, and had more cellular tissue samples and more material for ancillary studies than matched FNAs. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2016;124:110-121. © 2015 American Cancer Society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Cancer Cytopathology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:1934662X
DOI:10.1002/cncy.21623