التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
A critique of AI tool errors in Critical Path Analysis theory -- a project control case study. |
| المؤلفون: |
Antoniadis, Dimitris1 dnanton00@gmail.com |
| المصدر: |
PM World Journal. Jun2024, Vol. 13 Issue 6, p1-13. 13p. |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
*CRITICAL path analysis, *ARTIFICIAL intelligence, CHATGPT |
| الشركة/الكيان: |
PROJECT Management Institute |
| مستخلص: |
As the development and implementation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools globally continues to rise, we are beginning to see trends in published research considering its benefits and drawbacks. Several bodies have developed rules underpinning its use in their environments, while others (including governments) are continuing to work on building further regulations. The author has reflected on the latest trends in this space, especially the use of AI by project management professionals. In the latter part of January 2024, the author embarked on an extensive review of AI's current abilities in delivering Critical Path Analysis (CPA) outputs by testing ChatGPT (v3.5), and in cooperation with others, on ChatGPT (v4), as well as several other AI project management AI tools. This article will highlight the limitations in ChatGPT's and other AI tools functionality in compiling CPA outputs. Using an example from Project Management Institute (PMI), the author will present these errors as well as a critique of the outputs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of PM World Journal is the property of PM World Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Business Source Index |
