دورية أكاديمية

Network power and mental health policy in post-war Liberia.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Network power and mental health policy in post-war Liberia.
المؤلفون: Patterson, Amy S1 (AUTHOR), Clark, Mary A2 (AUTHOR) maclark@tulane.edu, Rogers, Al-Varney3 (AUTHOR)
المصدر: Health Policy & Planning. Jun2024, Vol. 39 Issue 5, p486-498. 13p.
مصطلحات موضوعية: *HEALTH facilities, MENTAL health policy, MENTAL health services, RIGHT to health, ASSOCIATION of ideas
مصطلحات جغرافية: LIBERIA
مستخلص: This article traces the influence of network power on mental health policy in Liberia, a low-income, post-conflict West African country. Based on key informant interviews, focus group discussions and document analysis, the work uses an inductive approach to uncover how a network of civil society groups, government officials, diasporans and international NGOs shaped the passage, implementation and revision of the country's 2009 and 2016 mental health policies. With relations rooted in ties of information, expertise, resources, commitment and personal connections, the network coalesced around a key agent, the Carter Center, which connected members and guided initiatives. Network power was evident when these actors channelled expertise, shared narratives of post-war trauma and mental health as a human right, and financial resources to influence policy. Feedback loops appeared as policy implementation created new associations of mental health clinicians and service users, research entities and training institutes. These beneficiaries offered the network information from lived experiences, while also pressing their own interests in subsequent policy revisions. As the network expanded over time, some network members gained greater autonomy from the key agent. Network power outcomes included the creation of government mental health institutions, workforce development, increased public awareness, civil society mobilization and a line for mental health in the government budget, though concerns about network overstretch and key agent commitment emerged over time. The Liberian case illustrates how networks need not be inimical to development, and how network power may facilitate action on stigmatized, unpopular issues in contexts with low state capacity. A focus on network power in health shows how power can operate not only through discrete resources such as funding but also through the totality of assets that network linkages make possible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Health Policy & Planning is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Business Source Index
الوصف
تدمد:02681080
DOI:10.1093/heapol/czae020