دورية أكاديمية

Safety and effectiveness of the three-dimensional-printed guide plate-assisted rotation axis positioning of a hinged external fixator for the elbow.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Safety and effectiveness of the three-dimensional-printed guide plate-assisted rotation axis positioning of a hinged external fixator for the elbow.
المؤلفون: Ma, Pengcheng1 (AUTHOR), Zheng, Jiachun1 (AUTHOR), Chen, Huizhi1 (AUTHOR), Yang, Weijie1 (AUTHOR), Gao, Hongwei1 (AUTHOR) gaohongwei202210@163.com
المصدر: International Orthopaedics. Jul2024, Vol. 48 Issue 7, p1799-1808. 10p.
مصطلحات موضوعية: *FLUOROSCOPY, *ELBOW, *SURGICAL complications, *ROTATIONAL motion, *HETEROTOPIC ossification, EXTERNAL fixators
مستخلص: Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of three-dimensional (3D)-printed guide plates for assisting in the positioning of the rotation axis of an elbow-hinged external fixator. Methods: Terrible triad (TT) patients, who were screened using the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, underwent installation of a hinged external fixator on the basis of internal fixation; 3D-printed guide plates, generated from the patient's imaging data, assisted in positioning the rotation axis. All patients received the same peri-operative management and were followed up at six, 12, 24, and 48 weeks postoperatively. The duration of positioning pin placement, the number of fluoroscopies, pin placement success rate, types and incidence of post-operative complications, and the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) of the diseased elbow and range of motion (ROM) of both elbows were assessed. Results: In 25 patients who completed the follow-up, the average time required for positioning pin placement was 329.32 ± 42.38 s (263–443 s), the average number of fluoroscopies was 2.32 ± 0.48 times (2–3 times), and the pin placement success rate was 100%. At the last follow-up, the mean MEPS of the diseased elbow was 97.50 ± 6.92 (75–100), with an excellent and good rate of 100%, and all patients demonstrated stable concentric reduction. The average range of flexion and extension was 135.08° ± 17.10° (77–146°), while the average range of rotation was 169.21° ± 18.14° (108–180°). No significant difference was observed in the average ROM between the both elbows (P > 0.05). Eight (32%) patients developed post-operative complications, including elbow stiffness due to heterotopic ossification in three (12%) patients, all of whom did not require secondary intervention. Conclusion: Utilizing 3D-printed guide plates for positioning the rotation axis of an elbow-hinged external fixator significantly reduced intra-operative positioning pin placement time and the number of fluoroscopies with excellent positioning results. Satisfactory results were also obtained in terms of post-operative complications, elbow ROM, and functional scores. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
قاعدة البيانات: Academic Search Index
الوصف
تدمد:03412695
DOI:10.1007/s00264-024-06134-3