التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Clinical practice for sarcopenia in Asia: Online survey by the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia. |
| المؤلفون: |
Yamada, Minoru1 (AUTHOR), Lee, Wei-Ju2 (AUTHOR), Akishita, Masahiro3 (AUTHOR), Yang, Ming4 (AUTHOR), Kang, Lin5 (AUTHOR), Kim, Sunyoung6 (AUTHOR), Lim, Jun-Pei7 (AUTHOR), Lim, Wee-Shiong8 (AUTHOR), Merchant, Reshma A9 (AUTHOR), Ong, Terence10 (AUTHOR), Peng, Li-Ning11 (AUTHOR), Phannarus, Harisd12 (AUTHOR), Tan, Maw-Pin10 (AUTHOR), Tay, Laura13 (AUTHOR), Won, Chang-Won6 (AUTHOR), Woo, Jean14 (AUTHOR), Chen, Liang-Kung15 (AUTHOR), Arai, Hidenori1,16 (AUTHOR) harai@ncgg.go.jp |
| المصدر: |
Archives of Gerontology & Geriatrics. Dec2023, Vol. 115, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p. |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
*HOSPITAL medical staff, *SARCOPENIA, *MEDICAL personnel, *COGNITION, *MEDICAL care, *COMPARATIVE studies, *PSYCHOSOCIAL factors, *QUESTIONNAIRES, *DESCRIPTIVE statistics, *ALLIED health personnel |
| مصطلحات جغرافية: |
ASIA |
| مستخلص: |
• Sarcopenia is well recognized, and the importance of its proper management is well understood. • However, there is a gap in case detection and management in clinical practice. • Management proficiency rates were higher among medical doctors (especially geriatricians) than allied health professionals. • This finding highlights the need to educate healthcare professionals to bridge Asia's knowledge–practice gap. This study aimed to (1) investigate the clinical practice for the management of sarcopenia among healthcare professionals in Asia, (2) determine the characteristics of clinical care provided by geriatricians versus by other healthcare professionals, and (3) clarify the awareness of sarcopenia. From December 1 to 31, 2022, an online survey was completed by 1990 healthcare professionals in Asia. The survey comprises demographics and institutional characteristics, basic sarcopenia-related details, and sarcopenia-related assessment and treatment details. The mean respondent age was 44.2 ± 10.7 years, 36.4% of the respondents were women, and the mean years of experience in clinical practice were 19.0 ± 10.6 years. The percentages of respondents who were aware of the term "sarcopenia", its definition and the importance of its management were high, at 99.3%, 91.9%, and 97.2%, respectively. The percentages of respondents who had screened patients for, diagnosed patients with, and treated patients for sarcopenia were 42.4%, 42.9%, and 58.8%, respectively. Medical doctors had higher performance rates compared to allied health professionals (45.5% vs. 40.5% for screening, 56.8% vs. 34.5% for diagnosis, and 65.0% vs. 55.0% for treatment) (P < 0.001). Especially, among medical doctors, geriatricians had significantly higher rates compared to non-geriatricians (64.3% vs. 34.1% for screening; 76.7% vs. 44.8% for diagnosis; 82.7% vs. 54.4% for treatment, respectively) (P < 0.001). Although the importance of the concept and management of sarcopenia is well recognized, there is a gap in its detection and management in clinical practice between medical doctors and allied health professionals, and also between geriatricians and non-geriatricians. Many geriatricians collaborate with other healthcare professionals to appropriately manage sarcopenia. In the future, educating all medical staff on the proper management of sarcopenia is necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Academic Search Index |
