دورية أكاديمية
Trends of utilization and perioperative outcomes of robotic and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in patients with lung cancer undergoing minimally invasive resection in the United StatesCentral MessagePerspective
العنوان: | Trends of utilization and perioperative outcomes of robotic and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in patients with lung cancer undergoing minimally invasive resection in the United StatesCentral MessagePerspective |
---|---|
المؤلفون: | Yahya Alwatari, MD, Jad Khoraki, MD, Luke G. Wolfe, MS, Bhavishya Ramamoorthy, MD, Natalie Wall, MD, Christopher Liu, MD, Walker Julliard, MD, Carlos A. Puig, MD, Rachit D. Shah, MD |
المصدر: | JTCVS Open, Vol 12, Iss , Pp 385-398 (2022) |
بيانات النشر: | Elsevier, 2022. |
سنة النشر: | 2022 |
المجموعة: | LCC:Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system LCC:Surgery |
مصطلحات موضوعية: | lung cancer, robotic, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system, RC666-701, Surgery, RD1-811 |
الوصف: | Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate utilization and perioperative outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) for lung cancer in the United States using a nationally representative database. Methods: Hospital admissions for lobectomy or sublobar resection (segmentectomy or wedge resection) using VATS or RATS in patients with nonmetastatic lung cancer from October 2015 through December 2018 in the National Inpatient Sample were studied. Patient and hospital characteristics, perioperative complications and mortality, length of stay (LOS), and total hospital cost were compared. Logistic regression was used to assess whether the surgical approach was independently associated with adverse outcomes. Results: There were 83,105 patients who had VATS (n = 65,375) or RATS (n = 17,710) for lobectomy (72.7% VATS) or sublobar resection (84.2% VATS). Utilization of RATS for lobectomy and sublobar resection increased from 19.2% to 34% and 7.3% to 22%, respectively. Mortality, LOS, and conversion rates were comparable. The cost was higher for RATS (P |
نوع الوثيقة: | article |
وصف الملف: | electronic resource |
اللغة: | English |
تدمد: | 2666-2736 |
العلاقة: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273622003163Test; https://doaj.org/toc/2666-2736Test |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.07.014 |
الوصول الحر: | https://doaj.org/article/90f4d43445c34c99b331092d78716f28Test |
رقم الانضمام: | edsdoj.90f4d43445c34c99b331092d78716f28 |
قاعدة البيانات: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
تدمد: | 26662736 |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.07.014 |