دورية أكاديمية
Comparison of two techniques for evaluation of pancreatic islet viability: flow cytometry and FDA/PI staining
العنوان: | Comparison of two techniques for evaluation of pancreatic islet viability: flow cytometry and FDA/PI staining |
---|---|
المؤلفون: | Lemos, Natália Emerim, Dieter, Cristine, Farias, Mariela Granero, Rheinheimer, Jakeline, Souza, Bianca Marmontel de, Bauer, Andrea Carla, Moreira, Daisy Crispim |
المصدر: | Clinical & Biomedical Research; Vol. 41 No. 4 (2021) ; Clinical and Biomedical Research; v. 41 n. 4 (2021) ; 2357-9730 |
بيانات النشر: | HCPA/FAMED/UFRGS |
سنة النشر: | 2021 |
المجموعة: | SEER UFRGS (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul: Sistema Eletrônico de Editoração de Periódic) |
مصطلحات موضوعية: | islet transplantation, islet isolation, viability, flow cytometry |
الوصف: | Introduction: The success of islet transplantation for patients with unstable type 1 diabetes mellitus is dependent, in part, on the number of isolated islets as well as their quality, which is assessed by functional and viability tests. The currently employed test to evaluate islet viability, used by the Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry to release clinical islet product for transplantation, is the FDA/PI staining. However, the efficacy of this method is dependent on the researcher experience. In this context, a quantitative method may be useful. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare islet viability assessed by flow cytometry and FDA/PI assay. Methods: Viability was evaluated in islets isolated from 10 male Wistar rats. Upon FDA and PI staining, 50 islets from each animal were analyzed under fluorescence microscope by two well-trained researchers. For flow cytometry, islets were dispersed, and then 100,000 single cells were incubated with 7AAD fluorophore (dyes necrotic and late apoptotic cells) and Annexin V-APC antibody (marker of early apoptotic cells). Results: A moderate correlation was found between the two techniques (r = 0.6; P= 0.047). The mean islet viability measured by flow cytometry was higher than the viability estimated using FDA/PI staining (95.5 ± 1.4% vs. 89.5 ± 5.0%; P= 0.002). Conclusions: Although flow cytometry is more expensive and time-consuming than FDA/PI staining, it is a quantitative technique, not dependent of the researcher experience. Thus, flow cytometry appears to be the technique of choice when aiming a more precise determination of islet viability. |
نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
وصف الملف: | application/pdf |
اللغة: | English |
العلاقة: | https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/108136/pdfTest; https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/108136Test |
الإتاحة: | https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/108136Test |
حقوق: | Copyright (c) 2021 Clinical and Biomedical Research |
رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.E81D657B |
قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
ResultId |
1 |
---|---|
Header |
edsbas BASE edsbas.E81D657B 857 3 Academic Journal academicJournal 856.820373535156 |
PLink |
https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.E81D657B&custid=s6537998&authtype=sso |
FullText |
Array
(
[Availability] => 0
)
Array ( [0] => Array ( [Url] => https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/108136# [Name] => EDS - BASE [Category] => fullText [Text] => View record in BASE [MouseOverText] => View record in BASE ) ) |
Items |
Array
(
[Name] => Title
[Label] => Title
[Group] => Ti
[Data] => Comparison of two techniques for evaluation of pancreatic islet viability: flow cytometry and FDA/PI staining
)
Array ( [Name] => Author [Label] => Authors [Group] => Au [Data] => <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lemos%2C+Natália+Emerim%22">Lemos, Natália Emerim</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Dieter%2C+Cristine%22">Dieter, Cristine</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Farias%2C+Mariela+Granero%22">Farias, Mariela Granero</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rheinheimer%2C+Jakeline%22">Rheinheimer, Jakeline</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Souza%2C+Bianca+Marmontel+de%22">Souza, Bianca Marmontel de</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bauer%2C+Andrea+Carla%22">Bauer, Andrea Carla</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Moreira%2C+Daisy+Crispim%22">Moreira, Daisy Crispim</searchLink> ) Array ( [Name] => TitleSource [Label] => Source [Group] => Src [Data] => Clinical & Biomedical Research; Vol. 41 No. 4 (2021) ; Clinical and Biomedical Research; v. 41 n. 4 (2021) ; 2357-9730 ) Array ( [Name] => Publisher [Label] => Publisher Information [Group] => PubInfo [Data] => HCPA/FAMED/UFRGS ) Array ( [Name] => DatePubCY [Label] => Publication Year [Group] => Date [Data] => 2021 ) Array ( [Name] => Subset [Label] => Collection [Group] => HoldingsInfo [Data] => SEER UFRGS (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul: Sistema Eletrônico de Editoração de Periódic) ) Array ( [Name] => Subject [Label] => Subject Terms [Group] => Su [Data] => <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22islet+transplantation%22">islet transplantation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22islet+isolation%22">islet isolation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22viability%22">viability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22flow+cytometry%22">flow cytometry</searchLink> ) Array ( [Name] => Abstract [Label] => Description [Group] => Ab [Data] => Introduction: The success of islet transplantation for patients with unstable type 1 diabetes mellitus is dependent, in part, on the number of isolated islets as well as their quality, which is assessed by functional and viability tests. The currently employed test to evaluate islet viability, used by the Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry to release clinical islet product for transplantation, is the FDA/PI staining. However, the efficacy of this method is dependent on the researcher experience. In this context, a quantitative method may be useful. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare islet viability assessed by flow cytometry and FDA/PI assay. Methods: Viability was evaluated in islets isolated from 10 male Wistar rats. Upon FDA and PI staining, 50 islets from each animal were analyzed under fluorescence microscope by two well-trained researchers. For flow cytometry, islets were dispersed, and then 100,000 single cells were incubated with 7AAD fluorophore (dyes necrotic and late apoptotic cells) and Annexin V-APC antibody (marker of early apoptotic cells). Results: A moderate correlation was found between the two techniques (r = 0.6; P= 0.047). The mean islet viability measured by flow cytometry was higher than the viability estimated using FDA/PI staining (95.5 ± 1.4% vs. 89.5 ± 5.0%; P= 0.002). Conclusions: Although flow cytometry is more expensive and time-consuming than FDA/PI staining, it is a quantitative technique, not dependent of the researcher experience. Thus, flow cytometry appears to be the technique of choice when aiming a more precise determination of islet viability. ) Array ( [Name] => TypeDocument [Label] => Document Type [Group] => TypDoc [Data] => article in journal/newspaper ) Array ( [Name] => Format [Label] => File Description [Group] => SrcInfo [Data] => application/pdf ) Array ( [Name] => Language [Label] => Language [Group] => Lang [Data] => English ) Array ( [Name] => NoteTitleSource [Label] => Relation [Group] => SrcInfo [Data] => https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/108136/pdf; https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/108136 ) Array ( [Name] => URL [Label] => Availability [Group] => URL [Data] => https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/108136 ) Array ( [Name] => Copyright [Label] => Rights [Group] => Cpyrght [Data] => Copyright (c) 2021 Clinical and Biomedical Research ) Array ( [Name] => AN [Label] => Accession Number [Group] => ID [Data] => edsbas.E81D657B ) |
RecordInfo |
Array
(
[BibEntity] => Array
(
[Languages] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[Text] => English
)
)
[Subjects] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => islet transplantation
[Type] => general
)
[1] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => islet isolation
[Type] => general
)
[2] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => viability
[Type] => general
)
[3] => Array
(
[SubjectFull] => flow cytometry
[Type] => general
)
)
[Titles] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[TitleFull] => Comparison of two techniques for evaluation of pancreatic islet viability: flow cytometry and FDA/PI staining
[Type] => main
)
)
)
[BibRelationships] => Array
(
[HasContributorRelationships] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[PersonEntity] => Array
(
[Name] => Array
(
[NameFull] => Lemos, Natália Emerim
)
)
)
[1] => Array
(
[PersonEntity] => Array
(
[Name] => Array
(
[NameFull] => Dieter, Cristine
)
)
)
[2] => Array
(
[PersonEntity] => Array
(
[Name] => Array
(
[NameFull] => Farias, Mariela Granero
)
)
)
[3] => Array
(
[PersonEntity] => Array
(
[Name] => Array
(
[NameFull] => Rheinheimer, Jakeline
)
)
)
[4] => Array
(
[PersonEntity] => Array
(
[Name] => Array
(
[NameFull] => Souza, Bianca Marmontel de
)
)
)
[5] => Array
(
[PersonEntity] => Array
(
[Name] => Array
(
[NameFull] => Bauer, Andrea Carla
)
)
)
[6] => Array
(
[PersonEntity] => Array
(
[Name] => Array
(
[NameFull] => Moreira, Daisy Crispim
)
)
)
)
[IsPartOfRelationships] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[BibEntity] => Array
(
[Dates] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[D] => 01
[M] => 01
[Type] => published
[Y] => 2021
)
)
[Identifiers] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[Type] => issn-locals
[Value] => edsbas
)
)
[Titles] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[TitleFull] => Clinical & Biomedical Research; Vol. 41 No. 4 (2021) ; Clinical and Biomedical Research; v. 41 n. 4 (2021) ; 2357-9730
[Type] => main
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
|
IllustrationInfo |