دورية أكاديمية

Development and testing of a three-period, subsize 2G AIMI MgB 2 planar undulator

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Development and testing of a three-period, subsize 2G AIMI MgB 2 planar undulator
المؤلفون: Garg, T, Rochester, J, Majoros, M, Kovacs, C, Peng, X, Rindfleisch, M, Xue, S, Tomsic, M, Doll, D, Collings, E W, Sumption, M D
المساهمون: DOE
المصدر: Superconductor Science and Technology ; volume 37, issue 1, page 015011 ; ISSN 0953-2048 1361-6668
بيانات النشر: IOP Publishing
سنة النشر: 2023
الوصف: Compared to Nb 3 Sn- and NbTi-wound superconducting undulators (SCUs), MgB 2 -wound SCUs are of interest for future electron synchrotron beam light sources owing to their higher temperature operating margin and associated stability. In this study, a three-period undulator consisting of twelve racetrack coils wound with 2nd generation (2 G) multifilamentary advanced-internal-magnesium-infiltration MgB 2 strands were fabricated and tested in liquid and gaseous helium (He) over a temperature range of 4.2 K–20 K. The coil winding cross sections (in each coil) were 5 mm wide and 4.8 mm thick. At 4.2 K, a critical current ( I c ) of 325.7 Amps produced a maximum undulator bore field of 1.19 T. It should be noted that the short, 3-period nature of the coil led to an asymmetry in the field profile (the maximum positive field was 1.19 T, the maximum negative was −0.25 T), suggesting a peak field of 0.72 T in the absence of end effects. Finite element modeling (FEM) results of simulations for a one meter long undulator of otherwise identical design gave 0.85 T (larger because of higher currents enabled by the lower field). But in any case, the I c value coil reached is 94% of that of the short sample (dictated by the 1.19 T positive field for the coil as tested). FEM was performed to study the magnetic field profile, which was validated experimentally. The magnetic field was measured using a Hall probe which was translated along the beam axis during measurement to explore the spatial field variation along the beam travel direction. The spatially alternating field was asymmetric, and the maximum field was more prominent in the positive direction than in the negative direction, the difference being due to broken symmetry, that is, short coil end effects. In this work, we show useful fields are possible for MgB 2 undulators; the use of such conductors can allow a larger thermal margin and enable conduction-cooled operation.
نوع الوثيقة: article in journal/newspaper
اللغة: unknown
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6668/ad0ee4
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6668/ad0ee4/pdf
الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/ad0ee4Test
حقوق: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0Test ; https://iopscience.iop.org/info/page/text-and-data-miningTest
رقم الانضمام: edsbas.C6606802
قاعدة البيانات: BASE
ResultId 1
Header edsbas
BASE
edsbas.C6606802
975
3
Academic Journal
academicJournal
975.149597167969
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.C6606802&custid=s6537998&authtype=sso
FullText Array ( [Availability] => 0 )
Array ( [0] => Array ( [Url] => https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/ad0ee4# [Name] => EDS - BASE [Category] => fullText [Text] => View record in BASE [MouseOverText] => View record in BASE ) )
Items Array ( [Name] => Title [Label] => Title [Group] => Ti [Data] => Development and testing of a three-period, subsize 2G AIMI MgB 2 planar undulator )
Array ( [Name] => Author [Label] => Authors [Group] => Au [Data] => <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Garg%2C+T%22">Garg, T</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rochester%2C+J%22">Rochester, J</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Majoros%2C+M%22">Majoros, M</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kovacs%2C+C%22">Kovacs, C</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Peng%2C+X%22">Peng, X</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rindfleisch%2C+M%22">Rindfleisch, M</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Xue%2C+S%22">Xue, S</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tomsic%2C+M%22">Tomsic, M</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Doll%2C+D%22">Doll, D</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Collings%2C+E+W%22">Collings, E W</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sumption%2C+M+D%22">Sumption, M D</searchLink> )
Array ( [Name] => Author [Label] => Contributors [Group] => Au [Data] => DOE )
Array ( [Name] => TitleSource [Label] => Source [Group] => Src [Data] => Superconductor Science and Technology ; volume 37, issue 1, page 015011 ; ISSN 0953-2048 1361-6668 )
Array ( [Name] => Publisher [Label] => Publisher Information [Group] => PubInfo [Data] => IOP Publishing )
Array ( [Name] => DatePubCY [Label] => Publication Year [Group] => Date [Data] => 2023 )
Array ( [Name] => Abstract [Label] => Description [Group] => Ab [Data] => Compared to Nb 3 Sn- and NbTi-wound superconducting undulators (SCUs), MgB 2 -wound SCUs are of interest for future electron synchrotron beam light sources owing to their higher temperature operating margin and associated stability. In this study, a three-period undulator consisting of twelve racetrack coils wound with 2nd generation (2 G) multifilamentary advanced-internal-magnesium-infiltration MgB 2 strands were fabricated and tested in liquid and gaseous helium (He) over a temperature range of 4.2 K–20 K. The coil winding cross sections (in each coil) were 5 mm wide and 4.8 mm thick. At 4.2 K, a critical current ( I c ) of 325.7 Amps produced a maximum undulator bore field of 1.19 T. It should be noted that the short, 3-period nature of the coil led to an asymmetry in the field profile (the maximum positive field was 1.19 T, the maximum negative was −0.25 T), suggesting a peak field of 0.72 T in the absence of end effects. Finite element modeling (FEM) results of simulations for a one meter long undulator of otherwise identical design gave 0.85 T (larger because of higher currents enabled by the lower field). But in any case, the I c value coil reached is 94% of that of the short sample (dictated by the 1.19 T positive field for the coil as tested). FEM was performed to study the magnetic field profile, which was validated experimentally. The magnetic field was measured using a Hall probe which was translated along the beam axis during measurement to explore the spatial field variation along the beam travel direction. The spatially alternating field was asymmetric, and the maximum field was more prominent in the positive direction than in the negative direction, the difference being due to broken symmetry, that is, short coil end effects. In this work, we show useful fields are possible for MgB 2 undulators; the use of such conductors can allow a larger thermal margin and enable conduction-cooled operation. )
Array ( [Name] => TypeDocument [Label] => Document Type [Group] => TypDoc [Data] => article in journal/newspaper )
Array ( [Name] => Language [Label] => Language [Group] => Lang [Data] => unknown )
Array ( [Name] => DOI [Label] => DOI [Group] => ID [Data] => 10.1088/1361-6668/ad0ee4 )
Array ( [Name] => DOI [Label] => DOI [Group] => ID [Data] => 10.1088/1361-6668/ad0ee4/pdf )
Array ( [Name] => URL [Label] => Availability [Group] => URL [Data] => https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/ad0ee4 )
Array ( [Name] => Copyright [Label] => Rights [Group] => Cpyrght [Data] => http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 ; https://iopscience.iop.org/info/page/text-and-data-mining )
Array ( [Name] => AN [Label] => Accession Number [Group] => ID [Data] => edsbas.C6606802 )
RecordInfo Array ( [BibEntity] => Array ( [Identifiers] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Type] => doi [Value] => 10.1088/1361-6668/ad0ee4 ) ) [Languages] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Text] => unknown ) ) [Titles] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [TitleFull] => Development and testing of a three-period, subsize 2G AIMI MgB 2 planar undulator [Type] => main ) ) ) [BibRelationships] => Array ( [HasContributorRelationships] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [PersonEntity] => Array ( [Name] => Array ( [NameFull] => Garg, T ) ) ) [1] => Array ( [PersonEntity] => Array ( [Name] => Array ( [NameFull] => Rochester, J ) ) ) [2] => Array ( [PersonEntity] => Array ( [Name] => Array ( [NameFull] => Majoros, M ) ) ) [3] => Array ( [PersonEntity] => Array ( [Name] => Array ( [NameFull] => Kovacs, C ) ) ) [4] => Array ( [PersonEntity] => Array ( [Name] => Array ( [NameFull] => Peng, X ) ) ) [5] => Array ( [PersonEntity] => Array ( [Name] => Array ( [NameFull] => Rindfleisch, M ) ) ) [6] => Array ( [PersonEntity] => Array ( [Name] => Array ( [NameFull] => Xue, S ) ) ) [7] => Array ( [PersonEntity] => Array ( [Name] => Array ( [NameFull] => Tomsic, M ) ) ) [8] => Array ( [PersonEntity] => Array ( [Name] => Array ( [NameFull] => Doll, D ) ) ) [9] => Array ( [PersonEntity] => Array ( [Name] => Array ( [NameFull] => Collings, E W ) ) ) [10] => Array ( [PersonEntity] => Array ( [Name] => Array ( [NameFull] => Sumption, M D ) ) ) [11] => Array ( [PersonEntity] => Array ( [Name] => Array ( [NameFull] => DOE ) ) ) ) [IsPartOfRelationships] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [BibEntity] => Array ( [Dates] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [D] => 01 [M] => 01 [Type] => published [Y] => 2023 ) ) [Identifiers] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [Type] => issn-locals [Value] => edsbas ) [1] => Array ( [Type] => issn-locals [Value] => edsbas.oa ) ) [Titles] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [TitleFull] => Superconductor Science and Technology ; volume 37, issue 1, page 015011 ; ISSN 0953-2048 1361-6668 [Type] => main ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IllustrationInfo