دورية أكاديمية
Accuracy Comparison between Robot-Assisted Dental Implant Placement and Static/Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies
| العنوان: | Accuracy Comparison between Robot-Assisted Dental Implant Placement and Static/Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Saurabh Jain, Mohammed E. Sayed, Wael I. Ibraheem, Abrar A. Ageeli, Sumir Gandhi, Hossam F. Jokhadar, Saad Saleh AlResayes, Hatem Alqarni, Abdullah Hasan Alshehri, Halah Mohammed Huthan, Atheer Alami, Mohammed Hussain Dafer Al Wadei, Yahya Aljabri |
| المصدر: | Medicina, Vol 60, Iss 1, p 11 (2023) |
| بيانات النشر: | MDPI AG, 2023. |
| سنة النشر: | 2023 |
| المجموعة: | LCC:Medicine (General) |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | dental implants, accuracy, computer-assisted implant surgery, robot-assisted implant surgery, navigation systems, surgical robot, Medicine (General), R5-920 |
| الوصف: | Background and Objectives: The present systematic review and meta-analysis undertake a comparison of studies that examine the accuracy of robot-assisted dental implant placement in relation to static computer-assisted implant surgery (SCAIS), dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery (DCAIS), and freehand procedures. This study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the precision of robot-assisted dental implant placement and its comparative efficacy in relation to other placement techniques. Methods: The guidelines recommended by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) were used to organize and compose this review. Four electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane) were systematically searched for pertinent articles. Articles were selected following the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of the selected articles were performed. Results: The initial electronic search resulted in 1087 hits. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, five articles were selected for qualitative analysis, out of which three were considered for quantitative analysis. Three parameters were considered for accuracy evaluation (angular, coronal, and apical deviation). The mean angular deviation was −1.22 degrees (95% CI, −1.06–−1.39), the mean coronal deviation was −0.15 mm (95% CI, −0.24–−0.07), and the mean apical deviation was −0.19 mm (95% CI, −0.27–−0.10). Conclusions: The robotic implant system was found to have significantly lower angular deviations and insignificantly lower coronal and apical deviations compared to DCAIS. Within the limitations of this review, it can be concluded that robot-assisted implant placement in resin models permits higher accuracy compared to DCAIS and SCAIS systems. However, due to the limited number of comparative studies with high heterogeneity, the findings of this review should be interpreted with caution. Further research is necessary to confirm the clinical application of robotics in implant surgery. |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article |
| وصف الملف: | electronic resource |
| اللغة: | English |
| تدمد: | 1648-9144 1010-660X |
| العلاقة: | https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/60/1/11Test; https://doaj.org/toc/1010-660XTest; https://doaj.org/toc/1648-9144Test |
| DOI: | 10.3390/medicina60010011 |
| الوصول الحر: | https://doaj.org/article/fd96cca0d3ae4457968a5b9c01f6e566Test |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsdoj.fd96cca0d3ae4457968a5b9c01f6e566 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 16489144 1010660X |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.3390/medicina60010011 |