-
1دورية أكاديمية
المؤلفون: Wróblewska, Iwona Ewa, Włoch, Wojciech
المصدر: Toruńskie Studia Polsko-Włoskie; XVIII (2022); 87-94 ; Studi Polacco-Italiani di Toruń; XVIII (2022); 87-94 ; 2391-7865 ; 2083-1986
مصطلحات موضوعية: horyzontalna interakcja konstytucyjnych wolności i praw, prawo do równego traktowania, Konstytucja RP, zakaz dyskryminacji, swoboda umów, horizontal interaction of constitutional freedoms and rights, right to equal treatment, Polish Constitution, German Basic Law, prohibition of discrimination, freedom of contract
وصف الملف: application/pdf
-
2دورية أكاديمية
المؤلفون: Álvarez Contreras, Juan Miguel
المصدر: Revista Derecho del Estado; No. 52 (2022): Mayo - Agosto ; 409-440 ; Revista Derecho del Estado; Núm. 52 (2022): Mayo - Agosto ; Revista Derecho del Estado; No 52 (2022): Mayo - Agosto ; Revista Derecho del Estado; N.º 52 (2022): Mayo - Agosto ; 2346-2051 ; 0122-9893
مصطلحات موضوعية: International Investment Agreements (IIA), Bilateral Investment Treaties (bit), investment chapters in Free Trade Agreements (FTA), right to equal treatment, Colombian Constitutional Court, investor-State investment dispute settlement, Acuerdos internacionales de inversión (AII), tratados bilaterales de inversión (TBI), capítulos de inversión en tratados de libre comercio (TLC), derecho a la igualdad, Corte Constitucional de Colombia, mecanismo inversionista-Estado para la solución de controversias de inversión
وصف الملف: application/pdf; text/html
العلاقة: https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/7807/11691Test; https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/7807/11692Test; Álvarez, G. M., Blasikiewicz, B., Koutouzi, K., Verdegay Mena, A., Mitsi, M., Spiteri-Gonzi, E., van Hoolwerff, T. y Willinski, P. A Response to the Criticism against isds by efila. En Journal of International Arbitration. 33, 1, 2016, 1-36. Disponible en: https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Journal+of+International+Arbitration/33.1/joia2016001Test; Bogdandy, A. von. Pluralism, Direct Effect, and the Ultimate Say: On the Relationship between International and Domestic Constitutional Law. En International Journal of Constitutional Law. Vol. 6, n.º 3-4, 2008, 397-413.; Bonnitcha, J., Poulsen, L. y Waibel, M. The Political Economy of the Investment Treaty Regime. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.; Comisión Europea. Online Public Consultation on Investment Protection and Investor-to-State Dispute Settlement (isds) in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Agreement (Ttip). Swd (2015)3 final, 13 de enero de 2015, 14. Disponible en: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015/january/tradoc_153044.pdfTest; De Mestral, A. y Morgan, R. Does Canadian Law Provide Remedies Equivalent to nafta Chapter 11 Arbitration? CIGI Investor-State Arbitration Series, 2016, Paper n.º 4.; Dodge, W. Investor-State Dispute Settlement between Developed Countries: Reflections on the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement. En Vanderbild Journal of Transnational Law. Vol. 39, 2006, 1-37.; Gallus, N. The Influence of the Host State’s Level of Development on International Investment Treaty Standards of Protection. En Journal of World Investment & Trade. Vol. 6, n.º 5, 2005, 711-730.; Gantz, D. Investor-State Dispute Settlement in US Law, Politics and Practice: The Debate Continues. CIGI Investor-State Arbitration Series, 2015, Paper n.º 9.; García-Castrillón, C. Spain and Investment Arbitration: The Renewable Energy Explosion. CIGI Investor-State Arbitration Series, 2017, Paper n.º 17.; Hamamoto, S. Debates in Japan over Investor-State Arbitration with Developed States. CIGI Investor-State Arbitration, 2016, Paper n.º 5.; Hanf, D. ‘Reverse Discrimination’ in EU Law: Constitutional Aberration, Constitutional Necessity, or Judicial Choice. En Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. Vol. 18, n.º 1-2, 2011, 29-61; Hepburn, J. Domestic Law in International Investment Arbitration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.; Iglesias, S. Purely Internal Situations and the Limits of EU Law: A Consolidated Case Law or a Notion to be Abandoned? En European Constitutional Law Review. Vol. 14, 2018, 7-36.; Insignares-Cera, S. y Molinares-Hassan, V. Juicio integrado de constitucionalidad. Análisis de la metodología utilizada por la Corte Constitucional colombiana. En Vniversitas. Vol. 61, n.º 124, 2012, 91-118.; Islam, R. The Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET) Standard in International Investment Arbitration. Singapur: Springer, 2018.; Johnson, L., Sachs, L. y Sachs, J. Investor-State Dispute Settlement, Public Interest and U.S. Domestic Law. ccsi Policy Paper, 2015.; Johnson, L. y Volkov, O. Investor-State Contracts, Host-State “Commitments” and the Myth of Stability in International Law. En The American Review of International Arbitration. Vol. 24, n.º 3, 2013, 361-415.; Kaushal, A. Revisiting History: How the Past Matters for the Present Backlash against the Foreign Investment Regime. En Harvard International Law Journal. Vol. 50, n.º 2, 2009, 491-534.; Kläger, R. ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’ in International Investment Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.; Kleinheisterkamp, J. y Poulsen, L. Investment Protection in TTIP: Three Feasible Proposals. GEG & BSG Policy Brief, 2014.; McRae, D. The Legal Effect of Interpretative Declarations. En British Yearbook of International Law. Vol. 49, n.º 1, 60, 1978, 155-173.; Montt, S. Aplicación de los tratados bilaterales de protección de inversiones por tribunales chilenos. Responsabilidad del Estado y expropiaciones regulatorias en un mundo crecientemente globalizado. En Revista Chilena de Derecho. Vol. 32, n.º 1, 2005, 19-78.; Nelson M. Declarations, Statements and ‘Disguised Reservations’ with Respect to the Convention on the Law of the Sea. En International and Comparative Law Quarterly. Vol. 50, n.º 4, 2001, 767-786.; Newcombe, A. y Paradell, L. Law and Practice of Investment Treaties: Standards of Treatment. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2009.; Pohl, J., Mashigo, K. y Nohen, A. Dispute Settlement Provisions in International Investment Agreements: A Large Sample Survey. OECD Working Papers on International Investment, 2012/02, OECD Publishing.; Poiares, M. The Scope of European Remedies: The Case of Purely Internal Situations and Reverse Discrimination. En Skidmore, P., Novitz, T. y Kilpatrick, C. (eds.), The Future of Remedies in Europe. Oxford: Hart, 2000.; Polanco, R. The No of Tokyo Revisited: Or How Developed Countries Learned to Start Worrying and Love the Calvo Doctrine. En icsid Review. Vol. 30, n.º 1, 2015, 172-193.; Poulsen, L., Bonnitcha, J. y Yackee, J. Costs and Benefits of an EU-USA Investment Protection Treaty. En lse Enterprise, 2013.; Rodríguez, C. y Rodríguez, D. ¿Es constitucional el TLC? En Boletín del Observatorio de Derechos Sociales y Políticas Públicas, Dejusticia. N.º 1, 2007.; Root, E. Basis of Protection to Citizens Residing Abroad. En American Journal of International Law. Vol. 4, n.º 3, 1910, 521-522.; Schill, S. Reforming Investor-State Dispute Settlement: A (Comparative and International) Constitutional Law Framework. En Journal of International Economic Law. Vol. 20, n.º 3, 2017, 652-657.; Schønberg, S. Legitimate Expectations in Administrative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.; Sornarajah, M. The International Law on Foreign Investment. 3.ª ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.; Trakman, L. Investor State Arbitration or Local Courts: Will Australia Set a New Trend? En Journal of World Trade. Vol. 46, n.º 1, 2012, 83-120.; Tryfonidou, A. Reverse Discrimination in Purely Internal Situations: An Incongruity in an Citizens’ Europe. En Legal Issues of Economic Integration. Vol. 35, n.º 1, 2008, 43-67.; UNCTAD. Expropriation. UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements ii. Nueva York y Ginebra: Naciones Unidas, 2012.; UNCTAD. Bilateral Investment Treaties 1959-1999. UNCTAD/ITE/IIA/2. Nueva York y Ginebra: Naciones Unidas, 2000.; Van Harten, G. The EU-Canada Joint Interpretive Declaration/Instrument on the CETA Updated Comments. Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper 6. Vol. 13, n.º 2, 2017.; Verbist, V. Reverse Discrimination in the European Union. A Recurring Balancing Act. Cambridge: Intersentia, 2017.; Yackee, J. New Trade Agreements Don’t Need ISDS. CATO Unbound, 19 de mayo de 2015. Disponible en: https://www.cato-unbound.org/2015/05/19/jason-yackee/new-tradeagreements-dont-need-isds#_edn1Test; Yannaca-Small, K. Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard. En Yannaca-Small, K. (ed.), Arbitration under International Investment Agreements. A Guide to Key Issues. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.; Zeyl, T. Charting the Wrong Course: The Doctrine of Legitimate Expectations in Investment Treaty Law. En Alberta Law Review. Vol. 49, n.º 1, 2011, 203-235.; https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/7807Test
-
3دورية أكاديمية
المؤلفون: Bascuñán Rodríguez, Antonio
المصدر: Revista de Estudios de la Justicia; No. 36 (2022): Primer Semestre; 1-52 ; Revista de Estudios de la Justicia; Núm. 36 (2022): Primer Semestre; 1-52 ; 0718-4735 ; 0718-0853
مصطلحات موضوعية: time and law, lex mitior principle (retrospective application of the milder law), legality, proportionality, right to equal treatment under the law, saving provision, reform of Chilean bankruptcy law, Act 20.720, aplicabilidad temporal de la ley penal, principio de lex mitior (retroactividad de la ley penal más favorable), principio de legalidad, principio de proporcionalidad, derecho a la igualdad ante la ley, derecho transitorio, reforma del derecho concursal chileno, Ley 20.720
وصف الملف: application/pdf
-
4دورية أكاديمية
المؤلفون: Alvarez Contreras, Juan Miguel
مصطلحات موضوعية: International Investment Agreements (IIA), Bilateral Investment Treaties (bit), investment chapters in Free Trade Agreements (FTA), right to equal treatment, Colombian Constitutional Court, investor-State investment dispute settlement, Acuerdos internacionales de inversión (AII), tratados bilaterales de inversión (TBI), capítulos de inversión en tratados de libre comercio (TLC), derecho a la igualdad, Corte Constitucional de Colombia, mecanismo inversionista-Estado para la solución de controversias de inversión
وصف الملف: application/pdf; text/html
العلاقة: https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/7807/11691Test; https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/7807/11692Test; Núm. 52 , Año 2022 : Mayo - Agosto; 440; 52; 409; Revista Derecho del Estado; Álvarez, G. M., Blasikiewicz, B., Koutouzi, K., Verdegay Mena, A., Mitsi, M., Spiteri-Gonzi, E., van Hoolwerff, T. y Willinski, P. A Response to the Criticism against isds by efila. En Journal of International Arbitration. 33, 1, 2016, 1-36. Disponible en: https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Journal+of+International+Arbitration/33.1/joia2016001Test; Bogdandy, A. von. Pluralism, Direct Effect, and the Ultimate Say: On the Relationship between International and Domestic Constitutional Law. En International Journal of Constitutional Law. Vol. 6, n.º 3-4, 2008, 397-413.; Bonnitcha, J., Poulsen, L. y Waibel, M. The Political Economy of the Investment Treaty Regime. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.; Comisión Europea. Online Public Consultation on Investment Protection and Investor-to-State Dispute Settlement (isds) in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Agreement (Ttip). Swd (2015)3 final, 13 de enero de 2015, 14. Disponible en: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015/january/tradoc_153044.pdfTest; De Mestral, A. y Morgan, R. Does Canadian Law Provide Remedies Equivalent to nafta Chapter 11 Arbitration? CIGI Investor-State Arbitration Series, 2016, Paper n.º 4.; Dodge, W. Investor-State Dispute Settlement between Developed Countries: Reflections on the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement. En Vanderbild Journal of Transnational Law. Vol. 39, 2006, 1-37.; Gallus, N. The Influence of the Host State’s Level of Development on International Investment Treaty Standards of Protection. En Journal of World Investment & Trade. Vol. 6, n.º 5, 2005, 711-730.; Gantz, D. Investor-State Dispute Settlement in US Law, Politics and Practice: The Debate Continues. CIGI Investor-State Arbitration Series, 2015, Paper n.º 9.; García-Castrillón, C. Spain and Investment Arbitration: The Renewable Energy Explosion. CIGI Investor-State Arbitration Series, 2017, Paper n.º 17.; Hamamoto, S. Debates in Japan over Investor-State Arbitration with Developed States. CIGI Investor-State Arbitration, 2016, Paper n.º 5.; Hanf, D. ‘Reverse Discrimination’ in EU Law: Constitutional Aberration, Constitutional Necessity, or Judicial Choice. En Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. Vol. 18, n.º 1-2, 2011, 29-61; Hepburn, J. Domestic Law in International Investment Arbitration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.; Iglesias, S. Purely Internal Situations and the Limits of EU Law: A Consolidated Case Law or a Notion to be Abandoned? En European Constitutional Law Review. Vol. 14, 2018, 7-36.; Insignares-Cera, S. y Molinares-Hassan, V. Juicio integrado de constitucionalidad. Análisis de la metodología utilizada por la Corte Constitucional colombiana. En Vniversitas. Vol. 61, n.º 124, 2012, 91-118.; Islam, R. The Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET) Standard in International Investment Arbitration. Singapur: Springer, 2018.; Johnson, L., Sachs, L. y Sachs, J. Investor-State Dispute Settlement, Public Interest and U.S. Domestic Law. ccsi Policy Paper, 2015.; Johnson, L. y Volkov, O. Investor-State Contracts, Host-State “Commitments” and the Myth of Stability in International Law. En The American Review of International Arbitration. Vol. 24, n.º 3, 2013, 361-415.; Kaushal, A. Revisiting History: How the Past Matters for the Present Backlash against the Foreign Investment Regime. En Harvard International Law Journal. Vol. 50, n.º 2, 2009, 491-534.; Kläger, R. ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’ in International Investment Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.; Kleinheisterkamp, J. y Poulsen, L. Investment Protection in TTIP: Three Feasible Proposals. GEG & BSG Policy Brief, 2014.; McRae, D. The Legal Effect of Interpretative Declarations. En British Yearbook of International Law. Vol. 49, n.º 1, 60, 1978, 155-173.; Montt, S. Aplicación de los tratados bilaterales de protección de inversiones por tribunales chilenos. Responsabilidad del Estado y expropiaciones regulatorias en un mundo crecientemente globalizado. En Revista Chilena de Derecho. Vol. 32, n.º 1, 2005, 19-78.; Nelson M. Declarations, Statements and ‘Disguised Reservations’ with Respect to the Convention on the Law of the Sea. En International and Comparative Law Quarterly. Vol. 50, n.º 4, 2001, 767-786.; Newcombe, A. y Paradell, L. Law and Practice of Investment Treaties: Standards of Treatment. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2009.; Pohl, J., Mashigo, K. y Nohen, A. Dispute Settlement Provisions in International Investment Agreements: A Large Sample Survey. OECD Working Papers on International Investment, 2012/02, OECD Publishing.; Poiares, M. The Scope of European Remedies: The Case of Purely Internal Situations and Reverse Discrimination. En Skidmore, P., Novitz, T. y Kilpatrick, C. (eds.), The Future of Remedies in Europe. Oxford: Hart, 2000.; Polanco, R. The No of Tokyo Revisited: Or How Developed Countries Learned to Start Worrying and Love the Calvo Doctrine. En icsid Review. Vol. 30, n.º 1, 2015, 172-193.; Poulsen, L., Bonnitcha, J. y Yackee, J. Costs and Benefits of an EU-USA Investment Protection Treaty. En lse Enterprise, 2013.; Rodríguez, C. y Rodríguez, D. ¿Es constitucional el TLC? En Boletín del Observatorio de Derechos Sociales y Políticas Públicas, Dejusticia. N.º 1, 2007.; Root, E. Basis of Protection to Citizens Residing Abroad. En American Journal of International Law. Vol. 4, n.º 3, 1910, 521-522.; Schill, S. Reforming Investor-State Dispute Settlement: A (Comparative and International) Constitutional Law Framework. En Journal of International Economic Law. Vol. 20, n.º 3, 2017, 652-657.; Schønberg, S. Legitimate Expectations in Administrative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.; Sornarajah, M. The International Law on Foreign Investment. 3.ª ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.; Trakman, L. Investor State Arbitration or Local Courts: Will Australia Set a New Trend? En Journal of World Trade. Vol. 46, n.º 1, 2012, 83-120.; Tryfonidou, A. Reverse Discrimination in Purely Internal Situations: An Incongruity in an Citizens’ Europe. En Legal Issues of Economic Integration. Vol. 35, n.º 1, 2008, 43-67.; UNCTAD. Expropriation. UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements ii. Nueva York y Ginebra: Naciones Unidas, 2012.; UNCTAD. Bilateral Investment Treaties 1959-1999. UNCTAD/ITE/IIA/2. Nueva York y Ginebra: Naciones Unidas, 2000.; Van Harten, G. The EU-Canada Joint Interpretive Declaration/Instrument on the CETA Updated Comments. Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper 6. Vol. 13, n.º 2, 2017.; Verbist, V. Reverse Discrimination in the European Union. A Recurring Balancing Act. Cambridge: Intersentia, 2017.; Yackee, J. New Trade Agreements Don’t Need ISDS. CATO Unbound, 19 de mayo de 2015. Disponible en: https://www.cato-unbound.org/2015/05/19/jason-yackee/new-tradeagreements-dont-need-isds#_edn1Test; Yannaca-Small, K. Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard. En Yannaca-Small, K. (ed.), Arbitration under International Investment Agreements. A Guide to Key Issues. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.; Zeyl, T. Charting the Wrong Course: The Doctrine of Legitimate Expectations in Investment Treaty Law. En Alberta Law Review. Vol. 49, n.º 1, 2011, 203-235.; https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/11490Test; https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n52.13Test
الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n52.13Test
https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/11490Test -
5دورية أكاديمية
المؤلفون: Jonathan Partington, Adriaan van der Walt
المصدر: Obiter; Vol. 26 No. 3 (2005) ; 2709-555X ; 1682-5853
مصطلحات موضوعية: right to equal treatment, derogations, “general fairness” defence, substantive equality
وصف الملف: application/pdf
العلاقة: https://obiter.mandela.ac.za/article/view/14618/18883Test; https://obiter.mandela.ac.za/article/view/14618Test
الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.17159/obiter.v26i3.14618Test
https://obiter.mandela.ac.za/article/view/14618Test -
6كتاب إلكتروني
المؤلفون: Guild, Elspeth, author, Peers, Steve, author, Tomkin, Jonathan, author
المصدر: The EU Citizenship Directive: A Commentary, 2019.
-
7دورية أكاديمية
المؤلفون: Zuta Palacios, Karla
المصدر: THEMIS Revista de Derecho; Núm. 75 (2019): Derecho laboral; 63-74 ; 1810-9934
مصطلحات موضوعية: gender pay gap, wage equity, right to equal treatment, labour discrimination, Brecha salarial, equidad salarial, derecho a la igualdad, discriminación laboral
وصف الملف: application/pdf
العلاقة: http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/21949/21365Test; http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/21949Test
الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.201901.005Test
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/21949Test -
8دورية أكاديمية
المؤلفون: Cettina Di Salvo
المصدر: Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu, Vol 64, Iss 3, Pp 93-112 (2016)
مصطلحات موضوعية: right to equal treatment, religious discrimination, directive 2000/78/EC, judicial procedure against discrimination, legal standing, burden of proof, remedies and enforcement, Law
وصف الملف: electronic resource
العلاقة: http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0003-2565/2016/0003-25651603093C.pdfTest; https://doaj.org/toc/0003-2565Test; https://doaj.org/toc/2406-2693Test
-
9مراجعة
المؤلفون: McCormack-George, Dáire
المصدر: Common Market Law Review. Oct2018, Vol. 55 Issue 5, p1647-1649. 3p.
مصطلحات موضوعية: LEGAL status of foreign workers, FREEDOM of movement, NONFICTION
مصطلحات جغرافية: EUROPEAN Union countries
Reviews & Products: WHAT Happened to Equality? The Construction of the Right to Equal Treatment of Third-Country Nationals in European Union Law on Labour Migration (Book)
People: FRITHRIKSDOTTIR, Bjarney
-
10دورية أكاديمية
المؤلفون: M. E. Kandel
المصدر: Russian Journal of Economics and Law, Vol 0, Iss 3, Pp 149-157 (2014)
مصطلحات موضوعية: implementation of the right for just payment, the right for equal pay for equal work, the right for equality in payment for work, the right for equal possibilities in employment and work, the right for equal treatment in employment and work, principle of equal payment for men and women, principle of equal payment for equal or equivalent work, Economics as a science, HB71-74, Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence, K1-7720
وصف الملف: electronic resource