المؤلفون: Huertas-Abril, Cristina A., Shashken, Aigerim

المصدر: Revista Complutense de Educación; Vol. 32 Núm. 2 (2021); 261-271 ; Revista Complutense de Educación; Vol 32 No 2 (2021); 261-271 ; 1988-2793 ; 1130-2496

مصطلحات موضوعية: AICLE, educación bilingüe, multilingüismo, política lingüística, política educativa, CLIL, bilingual education, multilingualism, language policy, educational policy

وصف الملف: application/pdf

العلاقة: https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RCED/article/view/68345/4564456556684Test; Amangeldina, G. A., Alken, S. H., & Rahmetova, G. S. (2014). Analysis of the Educational System for the Study of Technical Profile Language by Kazakh Students. European Journal of Natural History, 3, 3-8.; Anderson, L.W., & Krathwohl, D. (Eds.) (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman.; Banegas, D.L. (2015) The Challenges of CLIL Implementation in EFL Contexts. Journal for the support and development of content and language integrates learning (CLIL), 15, 11-13.; Bekenova, A. (2016) Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) as a Response to the Trilingual Education Implementation: Teachers’ Perceptions, Practices, and Challenges. GSE Nazarbayev University. https://conferences.nis.edu.kz/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/1-Bekenova%D0%90_eng.pdfTest.; Ceallaigh, T.Ó., Mhurchú, S.N., & Chróinín, D.N. (2017). Balancing content and language in CLIL: The experiences of teachers and learners. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 5(1), 58-86.; Charmaz, K. (1990). Discovering chronic illness: Using grounded theory. Social Science & Medicine, 30(11), 1161-1172.; Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE.; Cloud, N., Genesee, F., & Hamayan, E. (2000). Dual language instruction: A handbook for enriched education. Heinle & Heinle.; Coyle, D. (2005). CLIL: Planning Tools for Teachers. The University of Nottingham - School of Education.; Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL. Cambridge University Press.; Dale, L., & Tanner, R. (2012). CLIL activities: a resource for subject and language teachers. Cambridge University Press.; Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2017). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.). SAGE.; Discovery Education. (2020). Spotlight on Strategies. DEN – Discovery Education Network. https://en.discoveryeducation.ekb.eg/community-den/spotlight-on-strategiesTest/.; Donato, R. (2016). Sociocultural theory and content-based foreign language instruction: Theoretical insights on the challenge of integration. In L. Cammarata (Ed.), Content-based foreign language teaching (pp. 39-64). Routledge.; Dontsov, A. (2016). Measuring Students’ Abilities to Study Academic Subjects Taught in English at Postgraduate Level in the Republic of Kazakhstan, Level 3, 13(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.21427/D70B11Test.; Dyson, R. G. (2004). Strategic development and SWOT analysis at the University of Warwick. European Journal of Operational Research, 152, 631-640.; Eurydice (2006). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) at School in Europe. Eurydice Unit – European Commission.; Eurydice/Eurostat (2012). Key data on teaching languages at school in Europe, joint Eurydice/Eurostat publication, 2012 edition. https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice/content/key-data-teaching-languages-school-europe-2012_enTest.; Fabo, B., Beblavý, M. & Lenaerts, K. (2017) The importance of foreign language skills in the labour markets of Central and Eastern Europe: assessment based on data from online job portals. Empirica, 44, 487–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-017-9374-6Test.; Ferreira, A. M., & Kalaja, P. (2012). Beliefs in second language acquisition: Teacher. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0083Test.; García, O., Baetens Beardsmore, H., Cole, D., & Zakharia, Z., (2009). Heteroglossic bilingual education policy. In O. García & H. Baetens Beardsmore (Eds.), Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective (pp. 244–280). Wiley-Blackwell.; Georgiou, S.I. (2012). Reviewing the puzzle of CLIL. ELT Journal, 66(4), 495-504.; Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.; Gómez-Parra, M. E. (2016). EBeI: fortalezas, retos y oportunidades de un enfoque integrado. In R. Serrano, C. A. Huertas-Abril y M.ª E. Gómez Parra (Eds.), La educación sí importa en el siglo XXI. Síntesis.; Gruber, M. T., Lämmerer, A., Hofstadler, N., & Mercer, S. (2020). Flourishing or floundering? Factors contributing to CLIL Primary Teachers’ Wellbeing in Austria. CLIL. Journal of Innovation and Research in Plurilingual and Pluricultural Education, 3(1), 19-34.; Harrop, E. (2012). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Limitations and possibilities. Encuentro. Revista de investigaión e innovación en la clase de idiomas, 21, 57-70.; Heras, A., & Lasagabaster, D. (2015). The impact of CLIL on affective factors and vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 19(1), 70-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541736Test.; Kakenov, R. (2017). Teachers’ experiences of using CLIL in Kazakh language classrooms. NUGSE Research in Education, 2(2), 21-29. https://nur.nu.edu.kz/bitstream/handle/123456789/3122/Kakenov_CLIL%20in%20Kazakh.pdf?sequence=1Test.; Kane, E. (2017). Students’ perspectives on required English courses taught via a Communicative Approach and a CLIL approach. 島根県立大学「総合政策論叢」第 33 号, 25-39.; Karabassova, L. (2018): Teachers’ conceptualization of content and language integrated learning (CLIL): evidence from a trilingual context. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1550048Test.; Karimsakova, A. S., Yermenova, K. K., & Kuzembayeva, G. A. (2018). CLIL Implementation in West Kazakhstan Marat Ospanov State Medical University: Challenges and Experience. Journal of Medicine of West Kazakhstan, 57(1). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/clil-implementation-in-west-kazakhstan-marat-ospanov-state-medical-university-challenges-and-experienceTest.; Kewara, P., & Prabjandee, D. (2018). CLIL teacher professional development for content teachers in Thailand. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 6(1), 93-108.; Koike, A. (2014). A case study of CLIL practices in the EFL classroom. The Bulletin of the Institute of Human Sciences - Toyo University, 16, 147-156.; Korkushko, P. V. (2018). The role and place of CLIL in the educational process. Tomsk State University.; Krippendorf, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodologies. SAGE.; Lasagabaster, D. (2008). Foreign language competence in content and language integrated courses. The Open Applied Linguistics Journal, 1(1), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874913500801010030Test.; Lightbown, P.M. (2014). Focus on content-based language teaching. Oxford University Press.; Marsh, D., Hau, K., & Kong, S. (2000). Late immersion and language of instruction in Hong Kong high schools: Achievement growth in language and non-language subjects. Harvard Educational Review, 70, 302-346. doi: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.70.3.gm047588386655k5Test.; Mertens, D. M. (2014). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. SAGE.; Meyer, O. (2010). Towards Quality-CLIL: Successful Planning and Teaching Strategies. Pulso, 33, 11-29.; Neuendorf, J. (2019). Kazakhstan’s Trinity of Languages Program – A Model of Success or Failure? Central Eurasian Studies Society Conference. Georgetown University. https://nomadit.co.uk/conference/cess2019/paper/50394Test.; Nurpeisova, S. K. & Azimbayeva, Zh. A. (2015). Introduction of multilingual education: experience, problems and prospects / Внедрение полиязычного образования: опыт, проблемы и перспективы. Vestnik KarNU. http://rep.ksu.kz/bitstream/handle/data/6695/N%c3%bdrpe%c4%b1sova_Vnedren%c4%b1e_2015.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=yTest.; Patton, M.Q. (2003). Qualitative evaluation checklist. Evaluation Checklists Project. http://dmeforpeace.org/sites/default/files/Patton_Qualitative%20Evaluation%20Checklist.pdfTest.; Pérez-Cañado, M. L. (2016). Are teachers ready for CLIL? Evidence from a European study. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39(2), 202-221; Pidgeon, N., & Henwood, K. (1997). Using grounded theory in psychological research. In N. Hayes (Ed.), Doing qualitative analysis in psychology (pp. 245-273). Psychology Press.; Pladevall-Ballester, E. (2015). Exploring primary school CLIL perceptions in Catalonia: Students’, teachers’ and parents’ opinions and expectations. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18(1), 45-59.; Pohl, M. (2006). Still learning to think, thinking to learn. Into Bloom’s and Beyond. Planning with a thinking focus. Hawker Brownlow.; Republic of Kazakhstan. (2020). The Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan. http://www.akorda.kz/en/official_documents/constitutionTest.; Rumlich, D. (2016). Evaluating bilingual education in Germany: CLIL students’ general English proficiency, EFL self-concept and interest. Peter Lang.; Samejima, M., Shimizu, Y., Akiyoshi, M., & Komoda, N. (2006). SWOT analysis support tool for verification of business strategy. In IEEE International Conference on Computational Cybernetics (pp. 1–4). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCYB.2006.305700Test.; Sarsekeyeva, A. K., Kaliyeva, A. B., & Kanibolotskaya, Yu. M. (2012). Technology CLIL in Training Biology as one of the Components in the Updated Education Content. http://sibupk.su/upload/medialibrary/a53Test/.; Skinnari, K., & Bovellan, E. (2016). CLIL Teachers’ Beliefs about Integration and about Their Professional Roles: Perspective from a European Context. In T. Nikula, E. Dafouz, P. Moore, & U. Smit (Eds.), Conceptualising Integration in CLIL and Multilingual Education (pp. 145-169). Multilingual Matters.; Smagulova, J. (2006). Kazakhstan - Language, identity and conflict. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 19(3-4), 303-320. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610601029854Test.; Smala, S. (2014). Sole fighter mentality: stakeholder agency in CLIL programs in Queensland. The Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 195-208.; Snow, M.A., Met, M., & Genesee, F. (1989). A conceptual framework for the integration of language and content in second/foreign language instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 23(2), 201-216. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3587333Test.; Silvén, L.S. (2017). Motivation, second language learning and CLIL. In A. Llinares, & T. Morton (Eds.), Applied Linguistics Perspectives on CLIL (pp. 51-66). John Benjamins Publishing Company.; Tanaka, K. (2019). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Compatibility of a European Model of Education to Japanese Higher Education. 国際学研究, 54, 61-81; Thamrin, H., & Pamungkas, E. W. (2017). A rule based SWOT analysis application: A case study for Indonesian higher education institution. Procedia Computer Science, 116, 144-150.; Vitchenko, O. (2017). Introducing CLIL in Kazakhstan: Researching Beliefs and Perceptions of University Stakeholders. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 14(1), 102-116.; Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed.). SAGE.; Wolf, S. (2016). CLIL in Austrian technical colleges (HTLs)–a case study of teachers’ beliefs. Ögsd Tagungsberichte, 66. https://archiv-anglistik.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/sss_anglistik/%C3%96GSD_TAGUNGSBERICHTE_1_14.12.2016.pdf#page=72Test.; Yip, D., Tsang, W., & Cheung, S. (2003). Evaluation of the effects of medium of instruction on the science learning of Hong Kong secondary students: Performance on the science achievement test. Bilingual Research Journal, 27(2), 295-331. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2003.10162808Test.; Zharkynbekova, S., Akynova, D., & Aimoldina, A. (2017). Казахстанское Лингвистическое Пространство: Глобализация, Трехъязычие И Другие Вызовы / The Linguistic Landscape in Kazakhstan: Globalization, Triglossia and Other Challenges. Cross-Cultural Studies: Education and Science (CCS&ES), 2(1), 89-99.; Zwiers, J. (2006): Developing Academic thinking skills in Grades 6-12: A Handbook of Multiple Intelligence Activities. International Reading Association.; https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RCED/article/view/68345Test

الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.5209/rced.68345Test
https://doi.org/10.21427/D70B11Test
https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1550048Test
https://doi.org/10.2174/1874913500801010030Test
https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610601029854Test
https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RCED/article/view/68345Test

المؤلفون: Huertas Abril, Cristina Aránzazu, Shashken, Aigerim

المصدر: Redined, Red de Información Educativa
Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte (MECD)

مصطلحات موضوعية: multilingüismo, política de la educación, aprendizaje de lenguas, Kazajstán

الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=RECOLECTA___::5689b61e72c8ba41e47b0f602536649eTest
https://hdl.handle.net/11162/208810Test

العنوان البديل: Exploring the Potential of CLIL in Kazakhstan: A Qualitative Study. (English)

المؤلفون: Huertas-Abril, Cristina A., Shashken, Aigerim

المصدر: Revista Complutense de Educación; abr-jun2021, Vol. 32 Issue 2, p261-271, 11p

المؤلفون: Huertas Abril, Cristina Aránzazu, Shashken, Aigerim

مصطلحات موضوعية: aprendizaje de lenguas, multilingüismo, política de la educación, Kazajstán

العلاقة: Revista complutense de educación. 2021, v. 32, n. 2; p. 261-271; p. 268-270; https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RCED/article/view/68345Test; https://hdl.handle.net/11162/208810Test; https://doi.org/10.5209/rced.68345Test

الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.5209/rced.68345Test
https://hdl.handle.net/11162/208810Test
https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RCED/article/view/68345Test