دورية أكاديمية

Evaluating the Efficacy of Volume Isotropic Turbo Spin Echo Acquisition Versus T2-Weighted Turbo Spin Echo Imaging in the Diagnosis of Nerve Root and Perineuronal Pathologies in Spinal Disorders.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Evaluating the Efficacy of Volume Isotropic Turbo Spin Echo Acquisition Versus T2-Weighted Turbo Spin Echo Imaging in the Diagnosis of Nerve Root and Perineuronal Pathologies in Spinal Disorders.
المؤلفون: Sam, Ajina, S, Jaypradha, Pandian, Vinoth, Ramakrishnan, Karthik Krishna, Natarajan, Paarthipan, Muralidharan, Yuvaraj
المصدر: Cureus ; ISSN:2168-8184 ; Volume:16 ; Issue:5
بيانات النشر: PubMed Central
سنة النشر: 2024
المجموعة: PubMed Central (PMC)
مصطلحات موضوعية: 3d isotropic tse, isotropic turbo spin echo, mri, nerve root and perineuronal pathology, vista
الوصف: Background While two-dimensional (2D) turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences offer better through-plane resolution than three-dimensional (3D) isotropic TSE sequences images, with a narrower thickness of the slice, 3D isotropic TSE sequences are known to have a weaker in-plane resolution as well as blurring of the image. These elements may make it more difficult to distinguish between nearby structures that may affect nerve roots and small nerve roots during spinal imaging. This study aimed to analyze the accuracy of T2 TSE sequence and volumetric isotropic TSE acquisition in determining the indentation of nerve roots and perineural diseases such as nerve sheath tumors and Tarlov cysts. Methods Fifty patients who attended the Department of Radiodiagnosis for magnetic resonance (MR) spine participated in this prospective study. Routine MR lumbosacral (LS) spine sequences, such as survey, coronal T2 short-tau inversion recovery (STIR), sagittal T2 TSE, sagittal T1 TSE, and axial T2 TSE, were carried out after a localizer was acquired. More sequences from volume isotropic turbo spin echo acquisition (VISTA) were acquired. For both 2D and 3D sequences, the visibility ratings for perineural cysts, spinal canal stenosis, and nerve root indentation were evaluated. Visibility ratings ranged from zero to four. Results In the cases of perineural cyst, spinal canal stenosis, and nerve root impingement, the mean difference between the VISTA and T2 TSE visibility scores was 0.04, 0.54, and 0.56, respectively. The VISTA and T2 TS had standard deviation differences of 0.006, 0.026, and 0.06, respectively. The "t" values for nerve root impingement, spinal canal stenosis, and perineural cysts were, in order, 50, 180, and 70. Because the p-value was <0.01, a statistically significant variation has been observed. Conclusion In the diagnosis of neural and perineuronal disorders, the visibility scores for 3D T2 TSE (VISTA) were considerably better than those for 2D T2 TSE in identifying perineural cysts, spinal canal stenosis, and nerve root indentation.
نوع الوثيقة: article in journal/newspaper
اللغة: English
العلاقة: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.60988Test; https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38915957Test; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11195522Test/
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60988
الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.60988Test
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38915957Test
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11195522Test/
حقوق: Copyright © 2024, Sam et al.
رقم الانضمام: edsbas.3D02F6A3
قاعدة البيانات: BASE