المؤلفون: Shippee, Nathan D., Domecq Garces, Juan Pablo, Prutsky Lopez, Gabriela J., Wang, Zhen, Elraiyah, Tarig A., Nabhan, Mohammed, Brito, Juan P., Boehmer, Kasey, Hasan, Rim, Firwana, Belal, Erwin, Patricia J., Montori, Victor M., Murad, M Hassan

المساهمون: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)

المصدر: Health Expectations ; volume 18, issue 5, page 1151-1166 ; ISSN 1369-6513 1369-7625

الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12090Test

المؤلفون: Shippee, Nathan D., Domecq Garces, Juan Pablo, Prutsky Lopez, Gabriela J., Wang, Zhen, Elraiyah, Tarig A., Nabhan, Mohammed, Brito, Juan P., Boehmer, Kasey, Hasan, Rim, Firwana, Belal, Erwin, Patricia J., Montori, Victor M., Murad, M Hassan

مصطلحات موضوعية: patient and public involvement, patient engagement, systematic review, Public Health, Health Sciences

وصف الملف: application/pdf

العلاقة: Shippee, Nathan D.; Domecq Garces, Juan Pablo; Prutsky Lopez, Gabriela J.; Wang, Zhen; Elraiyah, Tarig A.; Nabhan, Mohammed; Brito, Juan P.; Boehmer, Kasey; Hasan, Rim; Firwana, Belal; Erwin, Patricia J.; Montori, Victor M.; Murad, M Hassan (2015). "Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework." Health Expectations 18(5): 1151-1166.; https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/113737Test; Health Expectations; Wright JG, Young NL. The patient‐specific index: asking patients what they want. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 1997; 79: 974 – 983.; Garcia CM, Gilchrist L, Campesino C, Raymond N, Naughton S, de Patino JG. Using community‐based participatory research to develop a bilingual mental health survey for Latinos. Progress in Community Health Partnerships, 2008; 2: 105 – 120.; Cashman SB, Adeky S, Allen AJ III et al. The power and the promise: working with communities to analyze data, interpret findings, and get to outcomes. American Journal of Public Health, 2008; 98: 1407 – 1417.; McCauley LA, Beltran M, Phillips J, Lasarev M, Sticker D. The Oregon migrant farmworker community: an evolving model for participatory research. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2001; 109 ( Suppl. 3 ): 449 – 455.; Cotterell P. Exploring the value of service user involvement in data analysis: ‘Our interpretation is about what lies below the surface'. Educational Action Research, 2008; 16: 5 – 17.; Chalmers I. What do I want from health research and researchers when I am a patient? BMJ, 1995; 310: 1315 – 1318.; Seifer SD, Sisco S. Mining the challenges of CBPR for improvements in urban health. Journal of urban health: bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 2006; 83: 981 – 984.; Roe KM, Minkler M, Saunders FF. Combining research, advocacy, and education: the methods of the Grandparent Caregiver Study. Health Education Quarterly, 1995; 22: 458 – 475.; van Wersch A, Eccles M. Involvement of consumers in the development of evidence based clinical guidelines: practical experiences from the North of England evidence based guideline development programme. Quality in health care: QHC, 2001; 10: 10 – 16.; Sayers J. Clinical trial registries: a survey of patient advocate group perceptions. Drug Information Journal, 2009; 2: 195 – 200.; Freysteinson WM. The ethical community consultation model as preparation for nursing research: a case study. Nursing Ethics, 2010; 6: 749 – 758.; van Staa T‐P, Leufkens HG, Zhang B, Smeeth L. A comparison of cost effectiveness using data from randomized trials or actual clinical practice: selective cox‐2 inhibitors as an example. PLoS Medicine, 2009; 6: e1000194.; Involvement Team: NHS County Durham and Darlington. Patient & Public Involvement Toolkit: a quick guide to support healthcare commissioners. NHS, 2011 Report. Available at: http://www.darlington.gov.uk/PublicMinutes/Health%20and%20Partnerships%20Scrutiny%20Committee/February52014%202012/Appendix%205%20-%20Appendix%205.pdfTest, accessed 22 May 2013.; Potvin L, Cargo M, McComber AM, Delormier T, Macaulay AC. Implementing participatory intervention and research in communities: lessons from the Kahnawake Schools Diabetes Prevention Project in Canada. Social Science & Medicine, 2003; 56: 1295 – 1305.; Butterfoss FD. Process evaluation for community participation. Annual Review of Public Health, 2006; 27: 323 – 340.; Thurston WE, Vollman AR, Meadows LM, Rutherford E. Public participation for women's health: strange bedfellows or partners in a cause? Health Care for Women International, 2005; 26: 398 – 421.; Thurston WE, MacKean G, Vollman A et al. Public participation in regional health policy: a theoretical framework. Health Policy, 2005; 73: 237 – 252.; Ntshanga SP, Ngcobo PS, Mabaso ML. Establishment of a Community Advisory Board (CAB) for tuberculosis control and research in the Inanda, Ntuzuma and KwaMashu (INK) area of KwaZulu‐Natal, South Africa. Health Policy, 2010; 2–3: 211 – 215.; Legare F, Boivin A, van der Weijden T et al. Patient and public involvement in clinical practice guidelines: a knowledge synthesis of existing programs. Medical Decision Making, 2011; 31: E45 – E74.; Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction‐GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011; 64: 383 – 394.; Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ, 2010; 182: E839 – E842.; Shiffman RN, Dixon J, Brandt C et al. The GuideLine Implementability Appraisal (GLIA): development of an instrument to identify obstacles to guideline implementation. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 2005; 5: 23. doi:10.1186/1472‐6947‐5‐23; Kreis J, Puhan MA, Schunemann HJ, Dickersin K. Consumer involvement in systematic reviews of comparative effectiveness research. Health Expectations, 2012; doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00722.x [Epub ahead of print]; van de Bovenkamp HM, Trappenburg MJ. Reconsidering patient participation in guideline development. Health Care Analysis, 2009; 3: 198 – 216.; ACOR.org. Association of Cancer Online Resources, 2012. Available at: http://www.acor.org/pages/faqsTest, accessed 22 May 2013.; NHS. National Institute for Health Research, 2012. Available at: http://www.nihr.ac.uk/Pages/default.aspxTest, accessed 22 May 2013.; lindalliance.org. The James Lind Alliance, 2012. Available at: http://www.lindalliance.orgTest/, accessed 22 May 2013.; thepatientpartnerproject.org. The PatientPartner project, 2012. Available at: http://www.thepatientpartnerproject.orgTest/, accessed 22 May 2013.; Oliver S, Clarke‐Jones L, Rees RW et al. Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing n evidence‐based approach. Health Technology Assessment, 2004; 8: 1 – 148.; Cancer Australia and Cancer Voices Australia. National Framework for Consumer Involvement in Cancer Control. Canberra, Australia: Cancer Australia, 2011.; Staley K. Exploring Impact: Public involvement in NHS, Public Health and Social Care Research. Eastleigh, UK: INVOLVE‐National Health Service‐National Institute for Health Research, 2009.; Telford R, Faulkner A. Learning about service user involvement in mental health research. Journal of Mental Health, 2004; 13: 549 – 559.; Marsden J, Bradburn J; Clinical TCAGf; Macmillan CLJ. Patient and clinician collaboration in the design of a national randomized breast cancer trial. Health Expectations, 2004; 1: 6 – 17.; Abma TA, Nierse CJ, Widdershoven GAM. Patients as partners in responsive research: methodological notions for collaborations in mixed research teams. Qualitative Health Research, 2009; 19: 401 – 415.; O'Donnell M, Entwistle V. Consumer involvement in decisions about what health‐related research is funded. Health Policy, 2004; 70: 281 – 290.; patientslikeme. patientslikeme [12/1/2011]. Available at: http://www.patientslikeme.comTest, accessed 22 May 2013.; Boivin A, Currie K, Fervers B et al. Patient and public involvement in clinical guidelines: international experiences and future perspectives. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 2010; 19: 1 – 4.; Abma TA, Broerse JEW. Patient participation as dialogue: setting research agendas. Health Expectations, 2010; 13: 160 – 173.; Ali K, Roffe C, Crome P. What patients want. Stroke, 2006; 37: 865 – 871.; Tong A, Sainsbury P, Carter SM et al. Patients' priorities for health research: focus group study of patients with chronic kidney disease. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2008; 23: 3206 – 3214.; Shea B, Santesso N, Qualman A et al. Consumer‐driven health care: building partnerships in research. Health Expectations, 2005; 8: 352 – 359.; Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O, Peacock R. Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta‐narrative approach to systematic review. Social Science & Medicine, 2005; 61: 417 – 430.; Andejeski Y, Bisceglio IT, Dickersin K et al. Quantitative impact of including consumers in the scientific review of breast cancer research proposals. Journal of Women's Health & Gender‐Based Medicine, 2002; 11: 379 – 388.; Faulkner A, Thomas P. User‐led research and evidence‐based medicine. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 2002; 180: 1 – 3.; Gooberman‐Hill R, Horwood J, Calnan M. Citizens' juries in planning research priorities: process, engagement and outcome. Health Expectations, 2008; 11: 272 – 281.; Donovan JL, Brindle L, Mills N. Capturing users' experiences of participating in cancer trials. European Journal Cancer Care (Engl), 2002; 11: 210 – 214.; White MA, Verhoef MJ. Toward a patient‐centered approach: incorporating principles of participatory action research into clinical studies. Integrative Cancer Therapies, 2005; 4: 21 – 24.; Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, Seers K, Herron‐Marx S, Bayliss H. The PIRICOM Study: A Systematic Review of the Conceptualisation, Measurement, Impact and Outcomes of Patients and Public Involvement in Health and Social Care Research. Warwick: Royal College of Nursing, University of Warwick, and UK Clinical Research Collaborative, Studies SoHS, 2010.; Thompson J, Barber R, Ward PR et al. Health researchers' attitudes towards public involvement in health research. Health Expectations, 2009; 12: 209 – 220.; Bogart LM, Uyeda KE. Community‐based participatory research. Health Psychology, 2009; 28: 391 – 393.; Caron‐Flinterman JF, Broerse JEW, Bunders JFG. The experiential knowledge of patients: a new resource for biomedical research? Social Science & Medicine, 2005; 60: 2575 – 2584.; Nierse CJ, Schipper K, van Zadelhoff E, van de Griendt J, Abma TA. Collaboration and co‐ownership in research: dynamics and dialogues between patient research partners and professional researchers in a research team. Health Expectations, 2011; 15: 242 – 254.; Howe A, MacDonald H, Barrett B, Little B. Ensuring public and patient participation in research: a case study in infrastructure development in one UK Research and Development consortium. Primary Health Care Research and Development, 2006; 7: 60 – 67. Epub 31 Oct 2006.; INVOLVE. July 2012 [cited 2012]. http://www.invo.org.ukTest/, accessed 22 May 2013.; Hanley B, Truesdale A, King A, Elbourne D, Chalmers I. Involving consumers in designing, conducting, and interpreting randomised controlled trials: questionnaire survey. BMJ, 2001; 322: 519 – 523.; Boote J, Telford R, Cooper C. Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda. Health Policy, 2002; 61: 213 – 236.; McKevitt C, Fudge N, Wolfe C. What is involvement in research and what does it achieve? Reflections on a pilot study of the personal costs of stroke. Health Expectations, 2010; 13: 86 – 94.; Hewlett S, de Wit M, Richards P et al. Patients and professionals as research partners: challenges, practicalities, and benefits. Arthritis Care & Research, 2006; 55: 676 – 680.; Whitstock MT. Seeking evidence from medical research consumers as part of the medical research process could improve the uptake of research evidence. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2003; 9: 213 – 224.; Wright D, Foster C, Amir Z, Elliott J, Wilson R. Critical appraisal guidelines for assessing the quality and impact of user involvement in research. Health Expectations, 2010; 13: 359 – 368.; Dewar BJ. Beyond tokenistic involvement of older people in research – a framework for future development and understanding. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2005; 14: 48 – 53.; Hubbard G, Kidd L, Donaghy E, McDonald C, Kearney N. A review of literature about involving people affected by cancer in research, policy and planning and practice. Patient Education and Counseling, 2007; 65: 21 – 33.; Faridi Z, Grunbaum JA, Sajor Grey B, Franks A, Simoes E. Community‐based participatory research: necessary next steps. Preventing Chronic Disease, 2007; 4: A70.; Bennetts W, Cross W, Bloomer M. Understanding consumer participation in mental health: issues of power and change. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 2011; 20: 155 – 164.; Chambers R, Brien LM, Linnell S, Sharp S. Why don't health researchers report consumer involvement? Quality in Primary Care, 2004; 12: 151 – 157.; Shared Decision Making National Resource Center. Patient Advisory Group: Mayo Clinic; 2012 [08/02/2012]. Available from: http://shareddecisions.mayoclinic.org/stakeholders/diabetes-advisory-groupTest/, accessed 22 May 2013.; Lindenmeyer A, Hearnshaw H, Sturt J, Ormerod R, Aitchison G. Assessment of the benefits of user involvement in health research from the Warwick Diabetes Care Research User Group: a qualitative case study. Health Expectations, 2007; 10: 268 – 277.; Morin SF, Morfit S, Maiorana A et al. Building community partnerships: case studies of Community Advisory Boards at research sites in Peru, Zimbabwe, and Thailand. Clinical Trials, 2008; 2: 147 – 156.; May M, Law J. CBPR as community health intervention: institutionalizing CBPR within community based organizations. Progress in Community Health Partnerships, 2008; 2: 145 – 155.; Redwood D, Lanier A, Kemberling M, Klejka J, Sylvester I, Lundgren K. Community‐based participatory research in a large cohort study of chronic diseases among Alaska native adults. Progress in Community Health Partnerships, 2010; 4: 325 – 330.; Evans S, Corley M, Corrie M, Costley K, Donald C. Evaluating services in partnership with older people: exploring the role of ‘community researchers’. Working with Older People: Community Care Policy & Practice, 2011; 15: 26 – 33.; Jinks C, Ong BN, Neill TJO. The Keele community knee pain forum: action research to engage with stakeholders about the prevention of knee pain and disability. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2009; 10: 85.; Swartz LJ, Callahan KA, Butz AM et al. Methods and issues in conducting a community‐based environmental randomized trial. Environmental Research, 2004; 95: 156 – 165.; Stewart RJ, Caird J, Oliver K, Oliver S. Patients' and clinicians' research priorities. Health Expectations, 2011; 4: 439 – 448.; Stewart MK, Colley D, Huff A et al. Participatory development and implementation of a community research workshop: experiences from a community‐based participatory research partnership. Progress in Community Health Partnerships, 2009; 3: 165 – 178.; Crowe JL, Keifer MC, Salazar MK. Striving to provide opportunities for farm worker community participation in research. Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health, 2008; 14: 205 – 219.; Decker M, Hemmerling A, Lankoande F. Women front and center: the opportunities of involving women in participatory health research worldwide. Journal of Women's Health (15409996), 2010; 19: 2109 – 2114.; Doyle M, Timonen V. Lessons from a community‐based participatory research project: older people's and researcher's reflections. Research on Aging, 2010; 32: 244 – 263.; Fawcett SB, Suarez‐Balcazar Y, Balcazar FE et al. Conducting intervention research—the design and development process. In: Rothman J, Thomas EJ, (eds) Intervention research: Design and development for human service. New York: Haworth Pr, 1994.; Morrow E, Ross F, Grocott P, Bennett J. A model and measure for quality service user involvement in health research. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 2010; 34: 532 – 539.; Turner M, Beresford P. User Controlled Research: Its Meanings and Potential. Final Report 2005 Eastleigh, Hants, UK: Shaping Our Lives and the Centre for Citizen Participation, Brunel University, 2005 [cited 2013 April 1]. Available at: http://www.invo.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/UserConRpt081205.pdfTest, accessed 22 May 2013.; Oscos‐Sanchez MA, Lesser J, Kelly P. Cultural competence: a critical facilitator of success in community‐based participatory action research. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 2008; 2: 197 – 200.; Ahmed SM, Palermo AGS. Community engagement in research: frameworks for education and peer review. American Journal of Public Health, 2010; 8: 1380 – 1387.; Karmaliani R, McFarlane J, Asad N et al. Applying community‐based participatory research methods to improve maternal and child health in Karachi, Pakistan. Nursing Outlook, 2009; 57: 204 – 209.; Harper GW, Salina DD. Building collaborative partnerships to improve community‐based HIV prevention research: the University‐CBO Collaborative partnership (UCCP) model. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 2000; 1: 1 – 20.; Danley KE, Ellison ML. A Handbook for Participatory Action Research. Boston: Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences Boston University, 2005.; Becker AB, Israel BA, Allen AJ III. Instructions for conducting a force field analysis. In: Israel BA, Eng E, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Satcher D. (eds). Methods in Community‐Based Participatory Research for Health. San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass, 2005.; Barnes M, Bennett G. Frail bodies, courageous voices: older people influencing community care. Health & Social Care in the Community, 1998; 6: 102 – 111.; Oliver SR, Rees RW, Clarke‐Jones L et al. A multidimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services research. Health Expectations, 2008; 1: 72 – 84.; Hall V. Reflections on engaging in participatory research. Evidence Based Midwifery, 2009; 7: 40 – 45.; Happell B, Roper C. Consumer participation in mental health research: articulating a model to guide practice. Australasian Psychiatry, 2007; 3: 237 – 241.; Gracia J, Blasco JA, Andradas E. A strategy for patient involvement in clinical practice guidelines: methodological approaches. BMJ Quality & Safety, 2011; 20: 779 – 784.; Israel BA, Krieger J, Vlahov D et al. Challenges and facilitating factors in sustaining community‐based participatory research partnerships: lessons learned from the Detroit, New York City and Seattle Urban Research Centers. Journal of Urban Health, 2006; 83: 1022 – 1040.; Saunders C, Crossing S, Girgis A, Butow P, Penman A. Operationalising a model framework for consumer and community participation in health and medical research. Aust New Zealand Health Policy, 2007; 4: 13.; National Health and Medical Research Council. A Model Framework for Consumer and Community Participation in Health and Medical Research. Canberra: Australian Government, 2005.; Wicks P, Vaughan TE, Massagli MP, Heywood J. Accelerated clinical discovery using self‐reported patient data collected online and a patient‐matching algorithm. Nature Biotechnology, 2011; 29: 411 – 414.; Tweet MS, Gulati R, Aase LA, Hayes SN. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a disease‐specific, social networking community‐initiated study. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 2011; 86: 845 – 850.; Chenoweth L, Kilstoff K. Facilitating positive changes in community dementia management through participatory action research. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 1998; 3: 175 – 188.; Staniszewska S, Jones N, Newburn M, Marshall S. User involvement in the development of a research bid: Barriers, enablers and impacts. Health Expectations, 2007; 10: 173 – 183.; Lippman SA, Donini A, Diaz J, Chinaglia M, Reingold A, Kerrigan D. Social‐environmental factors and protective sexual behavior among sex workers: the Encontros intervention in Brazil. American Journal of Public Health, 2010; 100 ( Suppl. 1 ): S216 – S223.; Edwards V, Wyatt K, Logan S, Britten N. Consulting parents about the design of a randomized controlled trial of osteopathy for children with cerebral palsy. Health Expectations, 2011; 14: 429 – 438.; Staniszewska S, Brett J, Mockford C, Barber R. The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research. International Journal of Technology Assessment; Staley K, Hanley B. Scoping research priority setting (and the presence of PPI in priority setting) with UK clinical research organisations and funders, 2008. Report. http://www.lindalliance.org/pdfs/JLA%20Internal%20Reports/TwoCan%20JLA%20report%20March%2009_with%20appendices.pdfTest, accessed 22 May 2013.; Lovato LC, Hill K, Hertert S, Hunninghake DB, Probstfield JL. Recruitment for controlled clinical trials: literature summary and annotated bibliography. Controlled Clinical Trials, 1997; 18: 328 – 352.; Pringle M, Churchill R. Randomised controlled trials in general practice. BMJ, 1995; 311: 1382 – 1383.; Tognoni G, Alli C, Avanzini F et al. Randomised clinical trials in general practice: lessons from a failure. BMJ, 1991; 303: 969 – 971.; Hussain‐Gambles M, Leese B, Atkin K, Brown J, Mason S, Tovey P. Involving South Asian patients in clinical trials. Health Technology Assessment, 2004; 8: iii 1 – 109.; Snowdon C, Garcia J, Elbourne D. Making sense of randomization; responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trial. Social Science & Medicine, 1997; 45: 1337 – 1355.; Snowdon C, Elbourne D, Garcia J. ‘It was a snap decision': parental and professional perspectives on the speed of decisions about participation in perinatal randomised controlled trials. Social Science & Medicine, 2006; 9: 2279 – 2290.; Kelson MC. Consumer collaboration, patient‐defined outcomes and the preparation of Cochrane Reviews. Health Expectations, 1999; 2: 129 – 135.; Whitley R, Goldman HH. Letters: client involvement in services research. Psychiatric Services, 2005; 56: 1315.

الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12090Test
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472Test‐6947‐5‐23
https://doi.org/10.1111Test/j.1369-7625.2011.00722.x
https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/113737Test