-
1كتاب
المساهمون: Mielczarek-Mikołajów, Justyna., Pietrasik, Ewelina., Prawnicza i Ekonomiczna Biblioteka Cyfrowa. Wydawca pbl, Uniwersytet Wrocławski. Instytucja sprawcza
المصدر: Bibliografia, wykaz aktów prawnych i adresów internetowych przy rozdziałach.
مصطلحات موضوعية: Administracja publiczna, Administracja samorządowa, Gminy, Planowanie regionalne, Samorząd terytorialny
جغرافية الموضوع: Polska
-
2دورية أكاديمية
المصدر: CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.6406, Cz.6407 ; http://195.187.71.2/ipac20/ipac.jsp?profile=geogpan&index=BOCLC&term=bb99159581Test ; CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, sygn.: Cz.6406, Cz.6407
مصطلحات موضوعية: comparative method, France, Germany, metropolitan region, regional planning, metoda porównawcza, Francja, Niemcy, region metropolitalny, planowanie regionalne
وصف الملف: application/octet-stream
العلاقة: Baden-Württemberg (2002). Landesentwicklungsplan. Stuttgart.; Bariol-Mathais, B. (Ed.). (2015). L'expérience métropolitaine lyonnaise. Collection Alternatives. Paris: FNAU, Gallimard.; Béhar, D., Czertok, S., & Desjardins, X. (2021). Au fil du débat. Faire région, faire France: Quand la région planifie. Boulogne-Billancourt: Berger-Levrault.; Berisha, E.; Cotella, G.; Janin Rivolin, U. & Solly, A. (2021). Spatial governance and planning systems in the public control of spatial development: a European typology, European Planning Studies, 29(1), 181-200.; Blotevogel, H.-H., Danielzyk, R., & Münter, A. (2014). Spatial Planning in Germany: Institutional Inertia and New Challenges. In M., Reimer, P., Getimis & H.H., Blotevogel (Eds.). Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe. A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes (pp. 83-107). London: Routledge.; Boino, P. (2007). Lyon: le territoire comme facteur de métropolisation. In A., Motte (Ed.). Collection Villes. Les agglomérations françaises face aux défis métropolitains (pp. 42-61). Paris: Economica, Anthropos.; Demazière, C. (2018). Strategic Spatial Planning in a Situation of Fragmented Local Government: The Case of France. disP - The Planning Review, 54(2), 58-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2018.1487645Test; Dembski, S., & O'Brien, P. (2023). The quest for certainty: Introducing zoning into a discretionary system in England and the European experience. Raumforschung und Raumordnung. Spatial Research and Planning, 81(6), pp. 579-590. https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.1695Test; Desjardins, X., & Geppert, A. (2019). Governance Rescaling and Regional Planning in France: Is Big Really Beautiful? In V., Lingua & V., Balz (Eds.). Shaping Regional Futures: Designing and Visioning in Governance Rescaling (pp. 121-132). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23573-4_9Test; Diedrich, L., & Dahl, C. (2016). Ile de Nantes 2000-2010: A method for the meantime? Journal of Landscape Architecture, 11(2), 72-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2016.1188576Test; Ducos, J.-P. (2015). L'efficacité environnementale des documents d'urbanisme : les Schémas de Cohérence Territoriale: Echelle nationale et locale: le cas du Maine-et-Loire. PhD thesis. Angers: Université d'Angers. Retrieved from https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01475750Test; Eichhorn, S.; Diller, C.; Pehlke, D. (2023). The Development of the Regulatory Intensity of German Regional Plans from 1985 to 2017. An Empirical Contribution to the Discussion on the Loss of Importance of Spatial Planning. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 81(3), 207-24. https://rur.oekom.de/index.php/rur/article/view/941Test; Einig, K. (2012). Regulierung des Siedlungsflächenwachstums als Herausforderung des Raumordnungsrechts. DisP - the Planning Review, 41(160), 48-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2005.10556906Test; Fédération des SCoT (2018). SCoT et PLUi. Panorama au 1er janvier 2018. Paris.; Furkert, M., & Skowronski, S. (2018): Eine Disziplin im Wandel. Entwicklung, aktueller Stellenwert und Handlungsoptionen der Raumordnung. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung 3. Retrieved from https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/veroeffentlichungen/izr/2018/3/downloads/disziplin-im-wandel.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1Test; Fürst, D. (2010). Raumplanung: Herausforderungen des deutschen Institutionensystems. Detmold: Rohn.; Galland, D. (2012). Is Regional Planning Dead or Just Coping? The Transformation of a State Sociospatial Project into Growth-Oriented Strategies. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(3), 536-552. https://doi.org/10.1068/c11150Test; Geppert, A. (2014). France, drifting away from the 'regional economic' approach. In M., Reimer, P., Getimis & H.H., Blotevogel, 2014 (Eds.). Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe. A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes (pp. 109-126). Routledge: London.; Griggs, S., Howarth, D., & Feandeiro, A. (2018). The logics and limits of "collaborative governance" in Nantes: Myth, ideology, and the politics of new urban regimes. Journal of Urban Affairs, 9(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1516508Test; Gustedt, E., Grabski-Kieron, U., Demazière, C., Paris, D. (Eds.). (2022). Cities and Metropolises in France and Germany. Hanover: ARL. Retrieved from https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0156-11198Test; Harrison, J., Galland, D., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2021). Regional planning is dead: long live planning regional futures. Regional Studies, 55(1), 6-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1750580Test; Henger, R., Schröter-Schlaack, C., Ulrich, P., & Distelkamp, M. (2010). Flächeninanspruchnahme 2020 und das 30-ha-Ziel: Regionale Verteilungsschlüssel und Anpassungserfordernisse. Raumforschung und Raumordnung. Spatial Research and Planning, 68(4), 297-309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-010-0038-2Test; Hertzog, R. (2018). Inter-municipal Cooperation in France: A Continuous Reform, New Trends. In F., Teles & P., Swianiewicz (Eds.). Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Europe: Institutions and Governance (pp. 133-155). Cham: Springer International Publishing.; Janin Rivolin, U. (2008). Conforming and performing planning systems in Europe: an unbearable cohabitation. Planning Practice & Research, 23(2), 167-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450802327081Test; Janin Rivolin, U. (2012). Planning Systems as Institutional Technologies: a Proposed Conceptualization and the Implications for Comparison. Planning Practice & Research, 27(1), 63-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.661181Test; Klee, A. (2022). Zum Bedeutungsverlust der Landesplanung, In M., Miosga, S., Dudek & A., Klee (Eds.). Neue Perspektiven für eine zukunftsfähige Raumordnung in Bayern (pp. 59-75). Hannover: ARL. https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0156-4394046Test; Mahé, S., & Bois, S. (2012). Naissance d'un grand territoire. In A., Masboungi (Ed.). Collection projet urbain. Estuaire Nantes - Saint-Nazaire. Écométropole, mode d'emploi (pp. 18-25). Paris: Éditions du Moniteur.; Moscarelli, F. (2016). La place de la biodiversité dans les documents de planification urbaine en France. urbe. Revista Brasileira de Gestão Urbana, 8(3), 407-424. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-3369.008.003.AO09Test; Nadin, V., & Fernández-Maldonado, A. M. (2023). Spatial planning systems in Europe: multiple trajectories. Planning Practice & Research, 38(5), 625-638. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2023.2258568Test; Nadin, V., Stead, D., Dąbrowski, M., & Fernandez-Maldonado, A. M. (2021). Integrated, adaptive and participatory spatial planning: trends across Europe. Regional Studies, 55(5), 791-803. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1817363Test; NRW (2017). Landesentwicklungsplan Nordrhein-Westfalen (LEP NRW). Düsseldorf.; Ouvrard, P. (2016). Le nouvel esprit de l'urbanisme, entre scènes et coulisses: Une ethnographie de la fabrique du territoire de Saint-Nazaire à Nantes. PhD thesis. Nantes: ENSA Nantes. Retrieved from http://archive.bu.univ-nantes.fr/pollux/fichiers/download/a889bf5a-0366-475c-a290-0408ffc91517Test; Parnet, C. (2016). Two faces of the city: Varieties of metropolitanisation in Lyon and Marseilles. In A., Cole & R., Payre (Eds.). Cities as Political Objects. Historical Evolution, Analytical Categorisations and Institutional Challenges of Metropolitanisation (pp. 241-264). Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12619Test; Purkarthofer, E., Humer, A., & Mäntysalo, R. (2021). Regional planning: an arena of interests, institutions and relations. Regional Studies, 55(5), 773-777. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1875128Test; RVR (2023). Regionalplan Ruhr. November 2023. Essen: Regionalverband Ruhr.; Salamin, G. (2023). The mapping of forms of spatial planning: An instrument-oriented tool for the international comparison of spatial planning activities. European Spatial Research and Policy, 30(1), 55-78. https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.30.1.03Test; Schmidt, S., Siedentop, S., & Fina, S. (2018). How effective are regions in determining urban spatial patterns? Evidence from Germany. Journal of Urban Affairs, 40(5), 639-656. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2017.1360741Test; Sellers, J. (2019). From Within to Between Nations: Subnational Comparison across Borders. Perspective on Politics, 17(1), 85-105. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592718002104Test; Siedentop, S., Fina, S., & Krehl, A. (2016). Greenbelts in Germany's regional plans-An effective growth management policy? Landscape and Urban Planning, 145, 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.09.002Test; Smas, L., & Schmitt, P. (2021). Positioning Regional Planning Across Europe. Regional Studies, 55(5), 778-790. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1782879Test; Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction: institutional change in advanced political economies. In W., Streeck & K., Thelen (Eds.). Beyond continuity: institutional change in advanced political economies (pp. 1-39). Oxford: University Press. Retrieved from https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-194981Test; Tilly, C. (1984). Big structures, large processes, huge comparisons. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.; van Straaten, F. M., Janssen-Jansen, L. B., & van den Brink, A. (2014). Delivering planning objectives through regional based land-use planning and land policy instruments: an assessment of recent experiences in the Dutch provinces. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(3), 567-584. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1277Test; Vanier, M. (2018). SRADDET, la carte et le territoire. Revue Urbanisme, 408, 51.; Verhage, R., Baker, M., & Boino, P. (2007). Strategic spatial planning at the metropolitan level: The case of Manchester and Lyon. In P., Booth, M., Breuillard, C., Fraser, & D., Paris (Eds.). Spatial planning systems of Britain and France: A comparative analysis (pp. 83-98). London, New York: Routledge.; Waterhout, B., Othengrafen, F., & Sykes, O. (2013). Neo-liberalization processes and spatial planning in France, Germany, and the Netherlands: an exploration. Planning Practice & Research, 28(1), 141-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.699261Test; Zimmermann, K., & Feiertag, P. (2022). Governance and City Regions: Policy and Planning in Europe. London: Routledge.; Europa XXI; oai:rcin.org.pl:publication:277267; https://rcin.org.pl/dlibra/publication/edition/240996/contentTest; oai:rcin.org.pl:240996
الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2018.1487645Test
https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2005.10556906Test
https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-3369.008.003.AO09Test
https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.30.1.03Test
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592718002104Test
https://rcin.org.pl/dlibra/publication/edition/240996/contentTest -
3دورية أكاديمية
المؤلفون: Kovács, András Donát. Autor, Farkas, Jenő Zsolt. Autor, Varjú, Viktor. Autor, Szalai, Ádám. Autor, Lennert, József. Autor, Hoyk, Edit. Autor, Csáki, Béla. Autor
المصدر: CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.6406, Cz.6407 ; http://195.187.71.2/ipac20/ipac.jsp?profile=geogpan&index=BOCLC&term=bb99159581Test ; CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, sygn.: Cz.6406, Cz.6407
مصطلحات موضوعية: Homokhátság, Hungary, regional planning, Sand Ridge, spatial policy, territorial development, Węgry, planowanie regionalne, polityka przestrzenna, rozwój terytorialny
وصف الملف: application/octet-stream
العلاقة: Barca, F. (2012). The case for regional development intervention: place-based versus neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), 134-152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.xTest; Bartholy, J., Mika, J., Pongrácz, R., & Schlanger, V. (2005). A globális felmelegedés éghajlati sajátosságai a Kárpát-medencében. In A., Takács-Sánta (Ed.). Éghajlatváltozás a világban és Magyarországon (pp. 105-139). Budapest: Alinea Kiadó - Védegylet.; Bíró, M. (2011). Változástérképek használata tíz év alatt bekövetkezett élőhelypusztulási tendenciák kimutatására a Kiskunsági-homokhátság területén. Tájökológiai Lapok, 9(2), 357-374. https://doi.org/10.56617/tl.3926Test; Bíró, M., Révész, A., Molnár, Zs., & Horváth, F. (2007). Regional habitat pattern of the Danube-Tisza interfluve in Hungary I. The landscape structure and habitat pattern; the fen and alkali vegetation. Acta Botanica Hungarica, 49(3-4), 267-303. https://doi.org/10.1556/ABot.49.2007.3-4.4Test; Castillo-Montoya, M. (2016). Preparing for Interview Research: The Interview Protocol Refinement Framework. The Qualitative Report, 21(5), 811-831. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2337Test; Copus, A., Kahlia, P., Dax, T., Kovács, K., Tagai, G., Weber, R., Grunfelder, J., Meredith, D., Ortega-Reig, M., Piras, S., Löfving, L., Moodie, J., Fritsch, M., & Ferrandis, A. (2021). European shrinking rural areas: key messages for a refreshed long-term European policy vision. TERRA.Revista de Desarrollo Local, 8, 280-309. https://doi.org/10.7203/terra.8.20366Test; Cowie, P., Townsend, L., & Salemink, K. (2020). Smart rural futures: Will rural areas be left behind in the 4th industrial revolution? Journal of Rural Studies, 79, 169-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.042Test; Csatári, B. (1999) Some elements in the local dimension of territorial development in Hungary. In Gleichwertige Lebensbedingungen in Mittelosteuropa - ein tragfähiges Konzept für die Raumordnung? (pp. 205-221). Hannover: Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung (ARL).; Csatári, B., Farkas, J. Zs., & Kovács, A. D. (2016). Egy alföldi tanyás mezőváros terének dinamikus változásai Kecskemét példáján. In S., Kókai (Ed.). A változó világ XXI. századi kihívásai: tanulmánykötet Prof. Dr. Hanusz Árpád egyetemi tanár 70. születésnapja tiszteletére (pp. 89-111). Nyíregyháza: Nyíregyházi Egyetem Turizmus és Földrajztudományi Intézet.; Csatári, B., Glatz, F., & Kovács, A. D. (2004). Homokhátság 2004: Szembesítés, lehetőségek, teendők. Kecskemét: MTA RKK.; Cserny, I., & Füleky, G. (2008). A Duna-Tisza közi homokhátság talajainak vízgazdálkodása. Talajvédelem, 53-63.; Delputte, S., & Orbie, J. (2020). Paradigm shift or reinventing the wheel? Towards a research agenda on change and continuity in EU development policy. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 16(2), 234-256. https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v16i2.1084Test; Ezcurra, R. (2019). Regional disparities and within-country inequality in the European Union. Revista De Economía Mundial, 51, 139-162. https://doi.org/10.33776/rem.v0i51.3907Test; Farkas, J. Z., Kőszegi, I. R., Hoyk, E., & Szalai, Á. (2023). Challenges and Future Visions of the Hungarian Livestock Sector from a Rural Development Viewpoint. Agriculture, 13(6), 1206. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13061206Test; Farkas, J. Zs., & Kovács, A. D. (2006). A homokhátsági tanyás térségek vizsgálata. Gazdálkodás, 50(1), 72-79. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.140211Test; Farkas, J. Zs., & Kovács, A. D. (2018). Kritikai észrevételek a magyar vidékfejlesztésről a vidékföldrajz szempontjából. Területi Statisztika, 58(1), 57-83. https://doi.org/10.15196/TS580103Test; Farkas, J. Zs., & Kovács, A. D. (2021). Nature conservation versus agriculture in the light of socio-economic changes over the last half-century - Case study from a Hungarian National Park. Land Use Policy, 101, 105131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105131Test; Farkas, J. Zs., Rakonczai, J., & Hoyk, E. (2015). Környezeti, gazdasági és társadalmi éghajlati sérülékenység: esettanulmány a Dél-Alföldről. Tér és Társadalom, 29(1), 149-174. https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.29.1.2675Test; Fayet, C. M., Reilly, K. H., Van Ham, C., & Verburg, P. H. (2022). What is the future of abandoned agricultural lands? A systematic review of alternative trajectories in Europe. Land Use Policy, 112, 105833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105833Test; Georgios, C., Nikolaos, N., & Michalis, P. (2021). Neo‐endogenous rural development: a path towar reviving rural Europe. Rural Sociology, 86(4), 911-937. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12380Test; Hoyk, E., Szalai, Á., Palkovics, A., & Farkas, J. Z. (2022). Policy Gaps Related to Sustainability in Hungarian Agribusiness Development. Agronomy, 12(9), 2084. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12092084Test; Ianoş, I. (2010). Spatial pattern of Romania's uneven territorial development. Revista Română de Geografie Politică, XII(1), 5-17.; IPCC (2023). Summary for Policymakers. In H., Lee & J., Romero (Eds.). Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 1-34). Geneva: IPCC.; Jánosi, I. M., Bíró, T., Lakatos, B. O., Gallas, J. A., & Szöllosi-Nagy, A. (2023). Changing Water Cycle under a Warming Climate: Tendencies in the Carpathian Basin. Climate, 11(6), 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli11060118Test; Kovách, I. (2017). Fogalmak és megközelítések. In I., Kovách (Ed.). Társadalmi integráció: az egyenlőtlenségek, az együttműködés, az újraelosztás és a hatalom szerkezete a magyar társadalomban (pp. 7-21). Budapest: MTA Társadalomtudományi Kutatóközpont Szociológiai Intézet.; Kovács, A. D., Farkas, J. Zs., & Perger, É. (2015). A vidék fogalma, lehatárolása és új tipológiai kísérlete. Tér és társadalom, 29(1), 11-34. https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.29.1.2674Test; Kovács, A. D., Hoyk, E., & Farkas, J. Zs. (2017). Homokhátság-A semi-arid region facing with complex problems in the Carpathian Basin. European Countryside, 9(1), 29-50. https://doi.org/10.1515/euco-2017-0003Test; KSH (2008). Central Statistical Office: Tájékoztató a kiemelten támogatott kistérségekről [Information about specially supported micro-regions]. Budapest: Központi Statisztikai Hivatal.; Kull, M. (2016). European integration and rural development: Actors, institutions and power. London: Routledge.; Margarian, A. (2013). A Constructive Critique of the Endogenous Development Approach in the European Support of Rural Areas. Growth and Change, 44(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12000Test; Margarian, A., & Hundt, C. (2023). One economy, but different growth regimes: why Germany's rural east is still lagging. Competitiveness Review, 33(7), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-09-2022-0130Test; Menconi, M. E., Chiappini, M., Hensen, J. L. M., & Grohmann, D. (2017). Thermal comfort optimisation of vernacular rural buildings: passive solutions to retrofit a typical farmhouse in central Italy. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 48(3), 127-136. https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2017.668Test; Michalcewicz-Kaniowska, M., & Zajdel, M. (2019). Rural development in European Union policy. Economic science for rural development, 50, 140-146. https://doi.org/10.22616/ESRD.2019.017Test; Molnár, B., & Balázs, R. (2009). A Duna-Tisza köze földtani fejlıdéstörténete és földtani értékei. Kiskunsági Nemzeti Park. Retrieved from http://knp.nemzetipark.gov.hu/index.php?pg=menu_2108Test; Naldi, L., Nilsson, P., Westlund, H., & Wixe, S. (2015). What is smart rural development? Journal of Rural Studies, 40, 90-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.06.006Test; Nyikos, Gy., & Soós, G. (2020). The Hungarian Experience of Using Cohesion Policy Funds and Prospects. In I., Musiałkowska, P., Idczak & O., Potluka (Eds.). Successes & Failures in EU Cohesion Policy: An Introduction to EU cohesion policy in Eastern, Central, and Southern Europe (pp. 119-142). Warsaw: De Gruyter Open Poland.; OGY (1995). 105/1995. (XI. 1.) OGY határozat a Duna-Tisza közi homokhátság vízpótlásáról. Retrieved from https://mkogy.jogtar.hu/jogszabaly?docid=995H0105.OGYTest (10.05.2023).; OGY (2005). 97/2005. (XII. 25.) OGY határozat az Országos Területfejlesztési Koncepcióról. Retrieved from https://njt.hu/jogszabaly/2005-97-30-41Test; OMSZ (2023). National Meteorological Service. Retrieved from https://www.met.hu/eghajlat/magyarorszag_eghajlataTest/ (10.05.2023).; Pálfai, I., Szilárd, Gy., & Váradi, J. (1998). Az aszály vízgazdálkodási hatásai Magyarországon. Vízügyi Közlemények, 80(1), 169–179.; Pe'er, G., Bonn, A., Bruelheide, H., Dieker P., Eisenhauer, N., Feindt, P. H., Hagedorn, G., Hansjürgens, B., Herzon, I., Lomba, Â., Marquard, E., Moreira, F., Nitsch, H., Oppermann, R., Perino, A., Röder, N., Schleyer, C., Schindler, S., Wolf, C., Zinngrebe, Y., & Lakner, S. (2020). Action needed for the EU Common Agricultural Policy to address sustainability challenges. People and Nature, 2(2), 305-316. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10080Test; Pe'er, G., Zinngrebe, Y., Moreira, F., Sirami, C., Schindler, S., Müller, R., Bontzorlos, V., Clough, D., Bezák, P., Bonn, A., Hansjürgens, B., Lomba, A., Möckel, S., Passoni, G., Schleyer, C., Schmidt, J., & Lakner, S. (2019). A greener path for the EU Common Agricultural Policy. Science, 365(6452), 449-451. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax3146Test; Perger, É. (2015). A Magyar Tudományos Akadémia és a Magyar Nemzeti Vidéki Hálózat együttműködése keretében megvalósult komplex vidékkutatási programról. Tér és Társadalom, 29(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.29.1.2698Test; Perger, É., & Kovács, A. D. (2019). A Tanyafejlesztési Program vidékkutatói szemmel. In J. Zs., Farkas, A. D., Kovács, É., Perger, J., Lennert, E., Hoyk & T., Gémes (Eds.). Alföldi kaleidoszkóp 254-263 MTA KRTK RKI, Kecskemét.; Rakonczai, J. (2011). Az Alföld tájváltozásai és a klímaváltozás. In J., Rakonczai (Ed.). Környezeti változások és az Alföld (pp. 137-148). Békéscsaba: Nagyalföld Alapítvány.; Rakonczai, J., Ladányi, Z., Blanka, V., Fehér, Z. Z., & Kovács, F. (2021). A globális környezeti változások fontosabb magyarországi hatásai. In J., Rakonczai (Ed.). Elfogyasztott jövőnk? : Globális környezeti és geopolitikai kihívásaink (pp. 271-303). Budapest: Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem.; Romvári, R., Szikora, A.Á., & Pap-Szuromi, O. (2018). Nemzeti vidékfejlesztési programok eredményei és aktualitásai: A Tanyafejlesztési Program és a Zártkerti Program. Falu Város Régió, 23(1), 156-164.; Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.; Salemink, K., Strijker, D., & Bosworth, G. (2017). Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 360-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.001Test; Sikora, A. (2021). European Green Deal - legal and financial challenges of the climate change. ERA Forum, 21, 681-697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-020-00637-3Test; Slee, B., Lukesch, R., & Ravazzoli, E. (2022). Social innovation: The promise and the reality in marginalised rural areas in Europe. World, 3(2), 237-259. https://doi.org/10.3390/world3020013Test; Smeriglio, A., Bachtler, J., & Sliwowski, P. (2016). Administrative capacity and cohesion policy: new methodological insights from Italy and Poland. In N. F., Dotti (Ed.). Learning from Implementation and Evaluation of the EU cohesion policy (pp. 173-190). Brussels: RSA Research Network on cohesion policy.; Smit, M. J., van Leeuwen, E. S., Florax, R. J. G. M., & de Groot, H. L. F. (2015). Rural development funding and agricultural labor productivity: a spatial analysis of the European Union at the NUTS2 level. Ecological Indicators, 59, 6-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.061Test; Terra Studio ÁBKSZ (2007). Előzetes megvalósíthatósági tanulmány - A Duna-Tisza közi Homokhátság fenntartható fejlesztése című projekt megalapozásához. Vezetői összefoglaló - Kormányhatározat - tervezet. Terra Studio ÁBKSZ Konzorcium.; Tickamyer, A. R., & Patel-Campillo, A. (2016). Sociological perspectives on uneven development. In G., Hooks (Ed.). The sociology of Development Handbook (pp. 293-310). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520963474-014Test; Tollefson, J. (2022). Climate change is hitting the planet faster than scientists originally thought. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-00585-7Test; Tosun, J. (2013). Absorption of Regional Funds: A Comparative Analysis. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(2), 371-387. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12088Test; Tran, H. Q., Fehér, Z. Z., Túri, N., & Rakonczai, J. (2022). Climate change as an environmental threat on the central plains of the Carpathian Basin based on regional water balances. Geographica Pannonica, 26(3), 184-199. https://doi.org/10.5937/gp26-37271Test; Zang, Y., Liu, Y., Yang, Y., Woods, M., & Fois, F. (2020). Rural decline or restructuring? Implications for sustainability transitions in rural China. Land Use Policy, 94, 104531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104531Test; Europa XXI; oai:rcin.org.pl:publication:276607; https://rcin.org.pl/dlibra/publication/edition/240413/contentTest; oai:rcin.org.pl:240413
الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.xTest
https://doi.org/10.56617/tl.3926Test
https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2337Test
https://doi.org/10.33776/rem.v0i51.3907Test
https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12000Test
https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.29.1.2698Test
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-020-00637-3Test
https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-00585-7Test
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12088Test
https://rcin.org.pl/dlibra/publication/edition/240413/contentTest -
4كتاب
المساهمون: Kozubek, Elżbieta Barbara., Sulmicki, Maciej., Pawłowski, Sebastian (zagospodarowanie przestrzenne)., Starzec, Patrycja (zagospodarowanie przestrzenne)., Szpiega, Piotr., Kamińska, Karolina (zagospodarowanie przestrzenne)., Mazowieckie Biuro Planowania Regionalnego (Warszawa). Instytucja sprawcza,Wydawca Instytucja sprawcza,Wydawca pbl
مصطلحات موضوعية: Mazowiecki Port Lotniczy Warszawa-Modlin, Mazowiecki Port Lotniczy Warszawa-Modlin, Porty lotnicze -- lokalizacja -- Polska -- Mazowsze (region), Dostępność komunikacyjna, Gospodarka niskoemisyjna, Lotniska, Planowanie regionalne, Transport lądowy
-
5كتاب
المؤلفون: Kozera, Mariusz. Autor
المساهمون: Mazowieckie Biuro Planowania Regionalnego (Warszawa). Wydawca pbl
مصطلحات موضوعية: Drogi, Planowanie przestrzenne, Planowanie regionalne
جغرافية الموضوع: Województwo mazowieckie (1999- )
-
6دورية أكاديمية
المؤلفون: Gasidło, Krzysztof
المصدر: Studia Miejskie; Vol. 35 (2019); 67-81 ; Studia Miejskie; Tom 35 (2019); 67-81 ; 2543-5302 ; 2082-4793
مصطلحات موضوعية: the Upper-Silesian Agglomeration, regional planning, great regional projects, aglomeracja górnośląska, planowanie regionalne, wielkie projekty regionalne
وصف الملف: application/pdf
-
7كتاب
المساهمون: Gergel, Sarah E., Turner, Monica Goigel., Springer-Verlag (Nowy Jork). Wydawca pbl
المصدر: Bibliografia przy rozdziałach. Indeks.
مصطلحات موضوعية: Geoekologia, Ekosystem, Planowanie regionalne, Monitoring środowiska, Biogeografia, Ochrona krajobrazu
-
8كتاب
المؤلفون: Huang, Yukon. Autor
المساهمون: Oxford University Press. Wydawca pbl
المصدر: Bibliografia na stronach 245-252. Indeks.
مصطلحات موضوعية: Planowanie regionalne, Polityka fiskalna, Inwestycje, Polityka gospodarcza
جغرافية الموضوع: Chiny
-
9كتاب
المساهمون: Gänzle, Stefan (1970- )., Kern, Kristine., Springer Nature. Wydawca pbl
المصدر: Bibliografia przy rozdziałach. Indeks.
مصطلحات موضوعية: Unia Europejska (UE), Polityka porównawcza, Regionalizm, Planowanie regionalne, Stosunki międzynarodowe, Polityka spójności UE, Regionalizm -- Kraje Unii Europejskiej, Zagospodarowanie przestrzenne -- Kraje Unii Europejskiej, Planowanie strategiczne -- Kraje Unii Europejskiej, Regionalizm (polityka międzynarodowa)
جغرافية الموضوع: Kraje Unii Europejskiej, Region adriatycki, Region bałtycki
-
10كتاب
المساهمون: Crăciun, Cerasella., Boştenaru Dan, Maria (1974- )., Springer Science+Business Media. Wydawca pbl
المصدر: Bibliografia przy rozdziałach. Indeks.
النص الكامل