A scoping review of clinical reasoning research with Asian healthcare professionals
| العنوان: | A scoping review of clinical reasoning research with Asian healthcare professionals |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Ching-Yi Lee, Hiroshi Nishigori, Pai-Hsuang Yang, Madawa Chandratilake, Lynn V Monrouxe, Gohar Wajid, Muhamad Saiful Bahri Yusoff, Julie Chen, Chang-Chyi Jenq, Mi-Mi Chen |
| المصدر: | Advances in Health Sciences Education |
| بيانات النشر: | Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2021. |
| سنة النشر: | 2021 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Scoping review, medicine.medical_specialty, Asia, Health Personnel, Population, Scopus, Clinical Reasoning, Article, Education, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Health professions, Health care, medicine, Humans, Learning, 030212 general & internal medicine, Nurse education, education, Curriculum, education.field_of_study, 030504 nursing, business.industry, Learning environment, General Medicine, Critical thinking, Family medicine, Students, Nursing, 0305 other medical science, business, Psychology, Delivery of Health Care, Inclusion (education) |
| الوصف: | Clinical reasoning is the thought process that guides practice. Although a plethora of clinical reasoning studies in healthcare professionals exists, the majority appear to originate from Western cultures. A scoping review was undertaken to examine clinical reasoning related research across Asian cultures. PubMed, SciVerse Scopus, Web of Science and Airiti Library databases were searched. Inclusion criteria included full-text articles published in Asian countries (2007 to 2019). Search terms included clinical reasoning, thinking process, differential diagnosis, decision making, problem-based learning, critical thinking, healthcare profession, institution, medical students and nursing students. After applying exclusion criteria, n = 240 were included in the review. The number of publications increased in 2012 (from 5%, n = 13 in 2011 to 9%, n = 22) with a steady increase onwards to 12% (n = 29) in 2016. South Korea published the most articles (19%, n = 46) followed by Iran (17%, n = 41). Nurse Education Today published 11% of the articles (n = 26), followed by BMC Medical Education (5%, n = 13). Nursing and Medical students account for the largest population groups studied. Analysis of the articles resulted in seven themes: Evaluation of existing courses (30%, n = 73) being the most frequently identified theme. Only seven comparative articles showed cultural implications, but none provided direct evidence of the impact of culture on clinical reasoning. We illuminate the potential necessity of further research in clinical reasoning, specifically with a focus on how clinical reasoning is affected by national culture. A better understanding of current clinical reasoning research in Asian cultures may assist curricula developers in establishing a culturally appropriate learning environment. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10459-021-10060-z. |
| تدمد: | 1573-1677 1382-4996 |
| الوصول الحر: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::87f1ccebca827fca59622811182ec689Test https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-021-10060-zTest |
| حقوق: | OPEN |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsair.doi.dedup.....87f1ccebca827fca59622811182ec689 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| تدمد: | 15731677 13824996 |
|---|