دورية أكاديمية

Quality of reporting of adverse events in clinical trials of covid-19 drugs: systematic review

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Quality of reporting of adverse events in clinical trials of covid-19 drugs: systematic review
المؤلفون: Madi, Karima, Flumian, Clara, Olivier, Pascale, Sommet, Agnès, Montastruc, François
المساهمون: Agence Nationale de la Recherche
المصدر: BMJ Medicine ; volume 2, issue 1, page e000352 ; ISSN 2754-0413
بيانات النشر: BMJ
سنة النشر: 2023
الوصف: Objective To assess the quality of reporting of adverse events in clinical trials of covid-19 drugs based on the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) harms extension and according to clinical trial design, and to examine reporting of serious adverse events in drug trials published on PubMed versus clinical trial summaries on ClinicalTrials.gov. Design Systematic review. Data sources PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov registries were searched from 1 December 2019 to 17 February 2022. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Randomised clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of drugs used to treat covid-19 disease in participants of all ages with suspected, probable, or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were included. Clinical trials were screened on title, abstract, and text by two authors independently. Only articles published in French and English were selected. The Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2) was used to assess risk of bias. Results The search strategy identified 1962 randomised clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of drugs used to treat covid-19, published in the PubMed database; 1906 articles were excluded after screening and 56 clinical trials were included in the review. Among the 56 clinical trials, no study had a high score for quality of reporting of adverse events, 60.7% had a moderate score, 33.9% had a low score, and 5.4% had a very low score. All clinical trials with a very low score for quality of reporting of adverse events were randomised open label trials. For reporting of serious adverse events, journal articles published on PubMed under-reported 51% of serious adverse events compared with clinical trial summaries published on ClinicalTrials.gov. Conclusions In one in three published clinical trials on covid-19 drugs, the quality of reporting of adverse events was low or very low. Differences were found in the number of serious adverse events reported in journal articles versus clinical trial summaries. During the covid-19 pandemic, ...
نوع الوثيقة: article in journal/newspaper
اللغة: English
DOI: 10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000352
الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000352Test
حقوق: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0Test/
رقم الانضمام: edsbas.E24CCE4E
قاعدة البيانات: BASE