المؤلفون: Zhang, S., Harris, J., Boyle, T., Williams, C., Antonia, S., Chiappori, A., Gray, J., Tanvetyanon, T., Creelan, B., Haura, E., Shafique, M., Fontaine, J., Cox, J., Kaszuba, F., Keenan, R., Nair, V., Toloza, E.

المصدر: Journal of Thoracic Oncology ; volume 13, issue 9, page S164 ; ISSN 1556-0864

مصطلحات موضوعية: Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology

الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2018.07.048Test
https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1556086418308438?httpAccept=text/xmlTest
https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1556086418308438?httpAccept=text/plainTest

المؤلفون: Rost-Roszkowska, Magdalena, Vilimova, J., Włodarczyk, Agnieszka, Sonakowska, Lidia, Kamińska, Karolina, Kaszuba, F., Marchewka, A., Sadilek, D.

مصطلحات موضوعية: alimentary tract, digestive cells, Midgut epithelium, secretory cells

العلاقة: Neotropical Entomology, Vol. 46, iss. 1 (2017), s. 45-57; http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/3861Test

الإتاحة: https://doi.org/20.500.12128/3861Test
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-016-0430-xTest
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/3861Test

المؤلفون: Rost-Roszkowska, M M, Vilimova, J, Włodarczyk, A, Sonakowska, L, Kamińska, K, Kaszuba, F, Marchewka, A, Sadílek, D

المصدر: Neotropical Entomology ; volume 46, issue 1, page 45-57 ; ISSN 1519-566X 1678-8052

مصطلحات موضوعية: Insect Science

الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-016-0430-xTest

المؤلفون: Šustr, V., Semanová, S., Rost-Roszkowska, M.M., Tajovský, K., Sosinka, A., Kaszuba, F.

المساهمون: Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy, Grantová Agentura České Republiky

المصدر: Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology ; volume 241, page 110388 ; ISSN 1096-4959

مصطلحات موضوعية: Molecular Biology, Physiology, Biochemistry

الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpb.2019.110388Test
https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1096495919303471?httpAccept=text/xmlTest
https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1096495919303471?httpAccept=text/plainTest

المؤلفون: Rost-Roszkowska, M.M., Vilimová, J., Tajovský, K., Chachulska-Żymełka, A., Sosinka, A., Kszuk-Jendrysik, M., Ostróżka, A., Kaszuba, F.

المصدر: Microscopy and Microanalysis ; volume 25, issue 4, page 1004-1016 ; ISSN 1431-9276 1435-8115

مصطلحات موضوعية: Instrumentation

الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.1017/s143192761900059xTest
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S143192761900059XTest

المؤلفون: Kamińska, K., Lipovšek, S., Kaszuba, F., Rost-Roszkowska, M.

المصدر: Zoologischer Anzeiger ; volume 279, page 82-93 ; ISSN 0044-5231

مصطلحات موضوعية: Animal Science and Zoology

الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2019.01.004Test
https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0044523119300105?httpAccept=text/xmlTest
https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0044523119300105?httpAccept=text/plainTest

المؤلفون: Michael, C. W., Faquin, W., Jing, X., Kaszuba, F., Kazakov, J., Moon, E., Toloza, E., Wu, R. I., Moreira, A. L.

مصطلحات موضوعية: rapid on site evaluation, specimen triage, bronchial brushings, and endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial fine‐needle aspiration, techniques for cytological study including bronchial washings, Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology recommendations for pulmonary cytology, imaging studies, clinical evaluation, Pathology, Health Sciences

وصف الملف: application/pdf

العلاقة: Michael, C. W.; Faquin, W.; Jing, X.; Kaszuba, F.; Kazakov, J.; Moon, E.; Toloza, E.; Wu, R. I.; Moreira, A. L. (2018). "Committee II: Guidelines for cytologic sampling techniques of lung and mediastinal lymph nodes." Diagnostic Cytopathology 46(10): 815-825.; https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/146505Test; Diagnostic Cytopathology; Eberhardt R, Anantham D, Ernst A, Feller‐Kopman D, Herth F. Multimodality bronchoscopic diagnosis of peripheral lung lesions: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007; 176: 36 – 41.; Yarmus LB, Akulian J, Lechtzin N, et al. Comparison of 21‐gauge and 22‐gauge aspiration needle in endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration: results of the American College of Chest Physicians Quality Improvement Registry, Education, and Evaluation Registry. Chest. 2013; 143: 1036 – 1043.; Xing J, Manos S, Monaco SE, Wilson DO, Pantanowitz L. Endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration: a pilot study to evaluate the utility of the ProCore biopsy needle for lymph node sampling. Acta Cytol. 2016; 60: 254 – 259.; Tyan C, Patel P, Czarnecka K, et al. Flexible 19‐gauge endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration needle: first experience. Respiration. 2017; 94: 52 – 57.; Michaelson ED, Serafind SM. Quantitative differences in the cellular yield of two bronchial brushes. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1975; 112: 267 – 268.; Ost DE, Ernst A, Lei X, et al. Diagnostic yield and complications of bronchoscopy for peripheral lung lesions. Results of the AQuIRE Registry. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016; 193: 68 – 77.; Guimaraes MD, Marchiori E, Hochhegger B, Chojniak R, Gross JL. CT‐guided biopsy of lung lesions: defining the best needle option for a specific diagnosis. Clinics. 2014; 69: 335 – 340.; Manhire A, Charig M, Clelland C, et al. Guidelines for radiologically guided lung biopsy. Thorax. 2003; 58: 920 – 936.; Collins BT, Chen AC, Wang JF, Bernadt CT, Sanati S. Improved laboratory resource utilization and patient care with the use of rapid on‐site evaluation for endobronchial ultrasound fine‐needle aspiration biopsy. Cancer Cytopathol. 2013; 121: 544 – 551.; Alsharif M, Andrade RS, Groth SS, Stelow EB, Pambuccian SE. Endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial fine‐needle aspiration: the University of Minnesota experience, with emphasis on usefulness, adequacy assessment, and diagnostic difficulties. Am J Clin Pathol. 2008; 130: 434 – 443.; Feller‐Kopman D, Yung RC, Burroughs F, Li QK. Cytology of endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration: a retrospective study with histology correlation. Cancer. 2009; 117: 482 – 490.; Nayak A, Sugrue C, Koenig S, Wasserman PG, Hoda S, Morgenstern NJ. Endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspirate (EBUS‐TBNA): a proposal for on‐site adequacy criteria. Diagn Cytopathol. 2012; 40: 128 – 137.; Jeffus SK, Joiner AK, Siegel ER, Massoll NA, Meena N, Chen C, Post SR, Bartter T. Rapid on‐site evaluation of EBUS‐TBNA specimens of lymph nodes: comparative analysis and recommendations for standardization. Cancer Cytopathol. 2015; 123: 362 – 372.; Thiryayi SA, Rana DN, Narine N, Najib M, Bailey S. Establishment of an endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial fine needle aspiration service with rapid on‐site evaluation: 2 years experience of a single UK centre. Cytopathology. 2016.; Mfokazi A, Wright CA, Louw M, et al. Direct comparison of liquid‐based and smear‐based cytology with and without rapid on‐site evaluation for fine needle aspirates of thoracic tumors. Diagn Cytopathol. 2016; 44: 363 – 368.; Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Hicks DG, et al. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014; 138: 241 – 256.; Moriarty AT, Nayar R, Auger M, et al. Nongynecologic cytology practice patterns: a survey of participants in the College of American Pathologists interlaboratory comparison program in nongynecologic cytopathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014; 138: 885 – 889.; Fischer AH, Schwartz MR, Moriarty AT, et al. Immunohistochemistry practices of cytopathology laboratories: a survey of participants in the College of American Pathologists Nongynecologic Cytopathology Education Program. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014; 138: 1167 – 1172.; Sturgis CD, Marshall CB, Barkan GA, et al. Respiratory cytology—current trends including endobronchial ultrasound‐guided biopsy and electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy: analysis of data from a 2013 supplemental survey of participants in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016; 140: 22 – 28.; Molina JR, Adjei AA, Jett JR. Advances in chemotherapy of non‐small cell lung cancer. Chest. 2006; 130: 1211 – 1219.; Moreira AL, Eng J. Personalized therapy for lung cancer. Chest. 2014; 146: 1649 – 1657.; Rekhtman N, Ang DC, Sima CS, Travis WD, Moreira AL. Immunohistochemical algorithm for differentiation of lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma based on large series of whole‐tissue sections with validation in small specimens. Mod Pathol. 2011; 24: 1348 – 1359.; Travis WD, Rekhtman N, Riley GJ, et al. Pathologic diagnosis of advanced lung cancer based on small biopsies and cytology: a paradigm shift. J Thorac Oncol. 2010; 5: 411 – 414.; van der Heijden EH, Casal RF, Trisolini R, et al. Guideline for the acquisition and preparation of conventional and endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration specimens for the diagnosis and molecular testing of patients with known or suspected lung cancer. Respiration. 2014; 88: 500 – 517.; Lindeman NI, Cagle PT, Beasley MB, et al. Molecular testing guideline for selection of lung cancer patients for EGFR and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors: guideline from the College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology. J Thorac Oncol. 2013; 8: 1343 – 1859.; Sauter JL, Grogg KL, Vrana JA, Law ME, Halvorson JL, Henry MR. Young investigator challenge: validation and optimization of immunohistochemistry protocols for use on cellient cell block specimens. Cancer Cytopathol. 2016; 124: 89 – 100.; Roy‐Chowdhuri S, Goswami RS, Chen H, et al. Factors affecting the success of next‐generation sequencing in cytology specimens. Cancer Cytopathol. 2015; 123: 659 – 668.; Cannonier SA, Sterling JA. The role of hedgehog signaling in tumor induced bone disease. Cancers. 2015; 7: 1658 – 1683.; Roy‐Chowdhuri S, Chow CW, Kane MK, et al. Optimizing the DNA yield for molecular analysis from cytologic preparations. Cancer Cytopathol. 2016; 124: 254 – 260.; Layfield LJ, Baloch Z, Elsheikh T, et al. Standardized terminology and nomenclature for respiratory cytology: The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology guidelines. Diagn Cytopathol. 2016; 44: 399 – 409.; Layfield LJ, Roy‐Chowdhuri S, Baloch Z, et al. Utilization of ancillary studies in the cytologic diagnosis of respiratory lesions: The papanicolaou society of cytopathology consensus recommendations for respiratory cytology. Diagn Cytopathol. 2016; 44: 1000 – 1009.; Michael CW, Hoda RS, Saqi A, et al. Committee I: indications for pulmonary cytology sampling methods. Diagn Cytopathol. 2016; 44: 1010 – 1023.; Rivera MP, Mehta AC, Wahidi MM. Establishing the diagnosis of lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence‐based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013; 143: e142S – e165S.; Uke MS, Pathuthara S, Shaikh A, Kumar R, Kane S. Is the morning sputum sample superior to the fresh sputum sample for the detection of malignant cells?. Acta Cytol. 2017; 61: 223 – 229.; Koss LG. The cytological diagnosis of cancer. Geriatrics. 1964; 19: 745 – 759.; Jones DP. Diagnostic work‐up of chest disease. Surg Clin North Am. 1980; 60: 743 – 755.; Healy TM, Borrie J. Lung cancer diagnosis: evaluation of diagnostic techniques. New Zealand Med J. May 14 1975; 81: 423 – 424.; Gilpin C, Kim SJ, Lumb R, Rieder HL, Van Deun A, et al. Critical appraisal of current recommendations and practices for tuberculosis sputum smear microscopy. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2007; 11: 946 – 952.; Murray MP, Doherty CJ, Govan JR, Hill AT. Do processing time and storage of sputum influence quantitative bacteriology in bronchiectasis?. J Med Microbiol. 2010; 59: 829 – 833.; Ho J, Marks GB, Fox GJ. The impact of sputum quality on tuberculosis diagnosis: a systematic review. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015; 19: 537 – 544.; Saraswathy Veena V, Sara George P, Jayasree K, Sujathan K. Comparative analysis of cell morphology in sputum samples homogenized with dithiothreitol, N‐acetyl‐L cysteine, Cytorich((R)) red preservative and in cellblock preparations to enhance the sensitivity of sputum cytology for the diagnosis of lung cancer. Diagn Cytopathol. 2015; 43: 551 – 558.; Choi YD, Han CW, Kim JH, et al. Effectiveness of sputum cytology using ThinPrep method for evaluation of lung cancer. Diagn Cytopathol. 2008; 36: 167 – 171.; Wu GP, Wang EH, Li JH, Fu ZM, Han S. Clinical application of the liquid‐based cytological test in cytological screening of sputum for the diagnosis of lung cancer. Respirology. 2009; 14: 124 – 128.; Agusti C, Xaubet A, Monton C, et al. Induced sputum in the diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer not visible endoscopically. Respir Med. 2001; 95: 822 – 828.; Bandyopadhyay T, Gerardi DA, Metersky ML. A comparison of induced and expectorated sputum for the microbiological diagnosis of community acquired pneumonia. Respiration. 2000; 67: 173 – 176.; Paggiaro PL, Chanez P, Holz O, et al. Sputum induction. Eur Respir J Suppl. 2002; 37: 3s – 8s.; Fishman JA, Roth RS, Zanzot E, Enos EJ, Ferraro MJ. Use of induced sputum specimens for microbiologic diagnosis of infections due to organisms other than Pneumocystis carinii. J Clin Microbiol. 1994; 32: 131 – 134.; Peter JG, Theron G, Pooran A, Thomas J, Pascoe M, Dheda K. Comparison of two methods for acquisition of sputum samples for diagnosis of suspected tuberculosis in smear‐negative or sputum‐scarce people: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013; 1: 471 – 478.; Al Zahrani K, Al Jahdali H, Poirier L, Rene P, Menzies D. Yield of smear, culture and amplification tests from repeated sputum induction for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2001; 5: 855 – 860.; Chang KC, Leung CC, Yew WW, Tam CM. Supervised and induced sputum among patients with smear‐negative pulmonary tuberculosis. Eur Respir J. 2008; 31: 1085 – 1090.; Souza Pinto V, Bammann RH. Chest physiotherapy for collecting sputum samples from HIV‐positive patients suspected of having tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2007; 11: 1302 – 1307.; Efthimiadis A, Jayaram L, Weston S, Carruthers S, Hargreave FE. Induced sputum: time from expectoration to processing. Eur Respir J. 2002; 19: 706 – 708.; Malekmohammad M, Marjani M, Tabarsi P, et al. Diagnostic yield of post‐bronchoscopy sputum smear in pulmonary tuberculosis. Scand J Infect Dis. 2012; 44: 369 – 373.; George PM, Mehta M, Dhariwal J, et al. Post‐bronchoscopy sputum: improving the diagnostic yield in smear negative pulmonary TB. Respir Med. 2011; 105: 1726 – 1731.; Aderaye G, GE H, Aseffa A, Worku A, Lindquist L. Comparison of acid‐fast stain and culture for Mycobacterium tuberculosis in pre‐ and post‐bronchoscopy sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage in HIV‐infected patients with atypical chest X‐ray in Ethiopia. Ann Thorac Med. 2007; 2: 154 – 157. Oct; Lim GH, Ross P, Landman S. Bronchial brush biopsy and primary lung carcinoma. Med J Aust. 1975; 2: 207 – 210.; Zavala DC, Richardson RH, Mukerjee PK, Rossi NP, Bedell GN. Use of the bronchofiberscope for bronchial brush biopsy. Diagnostic results and comparison with other brushing techniques. Chest. 1973; 63: 889 – 892.; Sato M, Saito Y, Nagamoto N, et al. Diagnostic value of differential brushing of all branches of the bronchi in patients with sputum positive or suspected positive for lung cancer. Acta Cytol. 1993; 37: 879 – 883.; Meyer KC, Raghu G, Baughman RP, et al. An official American Thoracic Society clinical practice guideline: the clinical utility of bronchoalveolar lavage cellular analysis in interstitial lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012; 185: 1004 – 1014.; Orholm M, Lundgren JD, Nielsen TL, Iversen J. Indication for fiberoptic bronchoscopy in HIV‐infected patients suspected for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. Danish Med Bull. 1990; 37: 86 – 89. Feb; Technical recommendations and guidelines for bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). Report of the European Society of Pneumology Task Group. Eur RespirJ. 1989; 2 ( 6 ): 561 – 585.; Radhakrishna N, Farmer M, Steinfort DP, King P. A comparison of techniques for optimal performance of bronchoalveolar lavage. J Bronchol Interv Pulmonol. 2015; 22: 300 – 305.; Izumo T, Sasada S, Chavez C, Matsumoto Y, Hayama M, Tsuchida T. The diagnostic value of histology and cytology samples during endobronchial ultrasound with a guide sheath. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2015; 45: 362 – 366.; Meyer KC, Raghu G. Bronchoalveolar lavage for the evaluation of interstitial lung disease: is it clinically useful?. Eur Respir J. 2011; 38: 761 – 769.; Baughman RP. Technical aspects of bronchoalveolar lavage: recommendations for a standard procedure. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2007; 28: 475 – 485.; Hurter T, Hanrath P. Endobronchial sonography: feasibility and preliminary results. Thorax. 1992; 47: 565 – 567.; Kurimoto N, Murayama M, Yoshioka S, Nishisaka T, Inai K, Dohi K. Assessment of usefulness of endobronchial ultrasonography in determination of depth of tracheobronchial tumor invasion. Chest. 1999; 115: 1500 – 1506.; Yasufuku K, Chiyo M, Koh E, et al. Endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration for staging of lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2005; 50: 347 – 354.; Berania I, Kazakov J, Khereba M, et al. Endoscopic mediastinal staging in lung cancer is superior to “gold standard” surgical staging. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016; 101: 547 – 550.; Eberhardt R, Kahn N, Gompelmann D, Schumann M, Heussel CP, Herth FJ. Lung point—a new approach to peripheral lesions. J Thorac Oncol. 2010; 5: 1559 – 1563.; Zhang W, Chen S, Dong X, Lei P. Meta‐analysis of the diagnostic yield and safety of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy for lung nodules. J Thorac Dis. 2015; 7: 799 – 809.; Chen A, Chenna P, Loiselle A, Massoni J, Mayse M, Misselhorn D. Radial probe endobronchial ultrasound for peripheral pulmonary lesions. A 5‐year institutional experience. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014; 11: 578 – 582.; Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Eloubeidi MA. Accessing the aortopulmonary window (#5) and the paraaortic (#6) lymph nodes in patients with non‐small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007; 84: 940 – 945.; Dhooria S, Aggarwal AN, Gupta D, Behera D, Agarwal R. Utility and safety of endoscopic ultrasound with bronchoscope‐guided fine‐needle aspiration in mediastinal lymph node sampling: systematic review and meta‐analysis. Respir Care. 2015; 60: 1040 – 1050.; Edey AJ, Pollentine A, Doody C, Medford AR. Differentiating benign from malignant mediastinal lymph nodes visible at EBUS using grey‐scale textural analysis. Respirology. 2015; 20: 453 – 458.; Fujiwara T, Yasufuku K, Nakajima T, et al. The utility of sonographic features during endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration for lymph node staging in patients with lung cancer: a standard endobronchial ultrasound image classification system. Chest. 2010; 138: 641 – 647.; Gupta NC, Tamim WJ, Graeber GG, Bishop HA, Hobbs GR. Mediastinal lymph node sampling following positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose imaging in lung cancer staging. Chest. 2001; 120: 521 – 527.; Li S, Zheng Q, Ma Y, et al. Implications of false negative and false positive diagnosis in lymph node staging of NSCLC by means of (1)(8)F‐FDG PET/CT. PloS One. 2013; 8: e78552.; Diacon AH, Schuurmans MM, Theron J, et al. Transbronchial needle aspirates: how many passes per target site?. Eur Respir J. 2006; 29: 112 – 116.; Kinsey CM, Arenberg DA. Endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration for non‐small cell lung cancer staging. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014; 189: 640 – 649.; Yarmus L, Akulian J, Gilbert C, et al. Optimizing endobronchial ultrasound for molecular analysis. How many passes are needed?. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2013; 10: 636 – 643.; Oki M, Saka H, Kitagawa C, et al. Randomized study of 21‐gauge versus 22‐gauge endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration needles for sampling histology specimens. J Bronchol Interv Pulmonol. 2011; 18: 306 – 310.; Saji J, Kurimoto N, Morita K, et al. Comparison of 21‐gauge and 22‐gauge needles for endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration of mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes. J Bronchol Interv Pulmonol. 2011; 18: 239 – 246.

الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.23975Test
https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/146505Test

المؤلفون: Rost-Roszkowska, M.M., Vilimová, J., Tajovský, K., Šustr, V., Sosinka, A., Kszuk-Jendrysik, M., Ostróżka, A., Kaszuba, F., Kamińska, K., Marchewka, A.

المصدر: Zoologischer Anzeiger ; volume 274, page 95-102 ; ISSN 0044-5231

مصطلحات موضوعية: Animal Science and Zoology

الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2018.01.006Test
https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0044523118300068?httpAccept=text/xmlTest
https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0044523118300068?httpAccept=text/plainTest

المؤلفون: Rost-Roszkowska, M, Vilimova, J, Włodarczyk, A, Sonakowska, L, Kamińska, K, Kaszuba, F, Marchewka, A, Sadílek, D

المصدر: Neotropical Entomology; February 2017, Vol. 46 Issue: 1 p45-57, 13p

المؤلفون: Dominik, I., Kaszuba, F., Dwornicka, R.

المصدر: Czasopismo Techniczne. Mechanika.

مصطلحات موضوعية: dielectric elastomers, electroactive polymers, smart materials, polimery elektroaktywne, materiały inteligentne, elastomery dielektryczne

الوصول الحر: http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/baztech/element/bwmeta1.element.baztech-4e76cc4f-0bf2-4482-a5b6-1a1d1e5f11daTest