-
1
المؤلفون: Jona Linde, Daniel Gietl, Joep Sonnemans, Jan Tuinstra
المصدر: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 211:305-323
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::0de83eedfcfe9f662d49f7ad865bff91Test
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2023.04.024Test -
2دورية أكاديمية
المؤلفون: Nadine Ketel, Jona Linde, Hessel Oosterbeek, Bas Van Der Klaauw
المساهمون: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
المصدر: http://ftp.iza.org/dp7951.pdfTest.
وصف الملف: application/pdf
العلاقة: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.649.1778Test; http://ftp.iza.org/dp7951.pdfTest
الإتاحة: http://ftp.iza.org/dp7951.pdfTest
-
3
المؤلفون: Jona Linde
المساهمون: RS: GSBE Theme Human Decisions and Policy Design, Microeconomics & Public Economics
المصدر: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics
مصطلحات موضوعية: Microeconomics, Politics, political behavior, expected utility theory, Economics, spatial models, political decision making, rational choice, Expected utility hypothesis, formal modeling
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::4a11a2d7ebe4b13c8efefae1f34564a9Test
https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.885Test -
4
المؤلفون: Jona Linde, Thomas de Haan
المساهمون: Microeconomics & Public Economics, RS: GSBE Theme Human Decisions and Policy Design
المصدر: The Economic Journal, 128(610), 1180-1206. Oxford University Press
مصطلحات موضوعية: Economics and Econometrics, Actuarial science, INFORMATION, EQUILIBRIA, LIBERTARIAN PATERNALISM, 05 social sciences, Libertarian paternalism, Affect (psychology), Choice architecture, PSYCHOLOGY, Malleability, MULTIPLE GAMES, 0502 economics and business, Economics, DECISIONS, 050211 marketing, Default, 050207 economics, OXYMORON, Reinforcement, EXPECTATIONS
وصف الملف: application/pdf
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::55d05207657e1783af0d01b781526c20Test
https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/en/publications/100e6bc0-1468-453c-8620-383c31fdb26eTest -
5دورية أكاديمية
المساهمون: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
المصدر: http://dare.uva.nl/document/2/117818Test/.
مصطلحات موضوعية: fairness, social preferences, decision making under risk, experiment Classification-JEL, C91, D63, D81
العلاقة: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.1031.7721Test; http://dare.uva.nl/document/2/117818Test/
الإتاحة: http://dare.uva.nl/document/2/117818Test/
-
6دورية أكاديمية
المؤلفون: Jona Linde (corresponding, Joep Sonnemans
المساهمون: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
مصطلحات موضوعية: fairness, social preferences, decision making under risk, experiment Classification-JEL, C91, D63, D81
وصف الملف: application/pdf
-
7
المؤلفون: Nadine Ketel, Hessel Oosterbeek, Bas van der Klaauw, Jona Linde
المساهمون: Economics, Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfskunde, Microeconomics (ASE, FEB), Microeconomics & Public Economics, RS: GSBE ETBC
المصدر: Ketel, N, Linde, J, Oosterbeek, H & van der Klaauw, B 2016, ' Tuition fees and sunk-cost effects ', Economic Journal, vol. 126, no. 598, pp. 2342-2362 . https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12297Test
Economic Journal, 126(598), 2342-2362. Wiley-Blackwell
The Economic Journal, 126(598), 2342-2362. Oxford University Pressمصطلحات موضوعية: Economics and Econometrics, Actuarial science, 05 social sciences, education, Attendance, DECISION, Full sample, Differential effects, ATTENDANCE, ENTRY, 0502 economics and business, SDG 1 - No Poverty, AID, Economics, ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION, 050207 economics, FIELD EXPERIMENT, Beneficial effects, Sunk costs, health care economics and organizations, 050205 econometrics
وصف الملف: application/pdf
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::b1cb423e29f838014701d39df0f82f0bTest
https://dare.uva.nl/personal/pure/en/publications/tuition-fees-and-sunkcost-effectsTest(7d4e2e98-14a6-40ae-bc1d-e145bb9b1e92).html -
8
المؤلفون: Jona Linde, Barbara Vis
المصدر: Political Psychology. 38:101-117
مصطلحات موضوعية: International relations, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Parliament, media_common.quotation_subject, 05 social sciences, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sample (statistics), 16. Peace & justice, 0506 political science, Philosophy, Clinical Psychology, Politics, Foreign policy, Prospect theory, Multiple time dimensions, 0502 economics and business, Political Science and International Relations, 050602 political science & public administration, Economics, 050207 economics, Positive economics, Social psychology, Expected utility hypothesis, media_common
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::84afc972ab5fc3af139d239d39c1683aTest
https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12335Test -
9دورية أكاديمية
المؤلفون: Thomas, de Haan, Jona, Linde
المساهمون: University of Amsterdam Research Priority Area in Behavioural Economics, University of Stirling, Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research
المصدر: The Economic Journal ; volume 128, issue 610, page 1180-1206 ; ISSN 0013-0133 1468-0297
الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12440Test
http://academic.oup.com/ej/article-pdf/128/610/1180/26398125/ej1180.pdfTest -
10
المؤلفون: Jona Linde, Joep Sonnemans
المساهمون: Microeconomics & Public Economics, RS: GSBE ETBC, Experimental and Political Economics / CREED (ASE, FEB), Political Science and Public Administration, Economics, Multi-layered governance in EUrope and beyond (MLG)
المصدر: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 56, 62-71. Elsevier Inc.
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 56, 62-71. Elsevier
Linde, J & Sonnemans, J 2015, ' Decisions under risk in a social and individual context: The limits of social preferences? ', Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, vol. 56, pp. 62-71 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2015.03.003Testمصطلحات موضوعية: Decision making under risk, Economics and Econometrics, SDG 16 - Peace, Fairness, EFFICIENCY, Face (sociological concept), Context (language use), COMPETITION, ERRORS, Affect (psychology), Social preferences, Outcome (game theory), Competition (economics), Experiment, Economics, ATTITUDES, Applied Psychology, health care economics and organizations, INCOME, Earnings, PRIVATE, SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions, General Social Sciences, INEQUALITY-AVERSE, Justice and Strong Institutions, HIERARCHY, INEQUITY AVERSION, Social psychology, Inequity aversion
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::c25473e4fcffd90509bf36373325f238Test
https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/en/publications/1da0b895-cae4-4d11-8647-86fb9b1b6005Test