يعرض 1 - 10 نتائج من 535 نتيجة بحث عن '"GALL STONE"', وقت الاستعلام: 0.82s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 1
    دورية أكاديمية
  2. 2
    دورية أكاديمية
  3. 3
    دورية أكاديمية
  4. 4
    دورية أكاديمية
  5. 5
    دورية أكاديمية
  6. 6
    دورية أكاديمية
  7. 7
  8. 8
    دورية أكاديمية
  9. 9
    دورية أكاديمية

    المصدر: Medical Visualization; Том 27, № 4 (2023); 104-114 ; Медицинская визуализация; Том 27, № 4 (2023); 104-114 ; 2408-9516 ; 1607-0763

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    العلاقة: https://medvis.vidar.ru/jour/article/view/1387/845Test; Costi R., Gnocchi A., Di Mario F., Sarli L. Diagnosis and management of choledocholithiasis in the golden age of imaging, endoscopy and laparoscopy. Wld J. Gastroenterol. 2014; 20 (37): 13382–13401. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i37.13382Test; Шаповальянц С.Г., Паньков А.Г., Будзинский С.А., Эрназаров Э.Э. Место транспапиллярных эндоскопических вмешательств при остром холецистите, осложненном патологией желчных протоков. Анналы хирургической гепатологии. 2020; 25 (3): 48–54. https://doi.org/10.16931/1995-5464.2020348-54Test; Рогаль М.Л., Новиков С.В., Магомедбеков М.М., Кудряшова Н.Е., Миронов А.В. Выбор тактики хирургического лечения больных с острым холециститом, осложненным холедохолитиазом. Хирургия. 2018; 4: 41–45. https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia2018441-45Test; Sridhar S., Thompson W.M. Fluoroscopic cholangiography: anatomy, pathology and intervention. Contemporary diagnostic radiology. 2020; 43 (11): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CDR.0000662568.80771.72Test; Senturk S., Miroglu T.C., Bilici A. et al. Diameters of the common bile duct in adults and postcholecystectomy patients: A study with 64-slice CT. Eur. J. Radiol. 2012; 81: 39–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.11.007Test; Karamanos E., Inaba K., Berg R.J. et al. The relationship between age, common bile duct diameter and diagnostic probability in suspected choledocholithiasis. Dig. Surg. 2017; 34 (5): 421–428. https://doi.org/10.1159/000455272Test; Manes G., Paspatis G., Aabakken L. et al. Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones: European society of gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guidelines. Endoscopy. 2019; 51 (5): 472–491. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0862-0346Test; Hindman N.M., Arif-Tiwari H., Kamel I.R. et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Jaundice. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 2019; 16 (5S): S126–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2019.02.012Test; Narula V.K., Fung E.C., Overby D.W. et al. Clinical spotlight review for the management of choledocholithiasis. Surg. Endosc. 2020; 34 (4): 1482–1491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07462-2Test; Ничипор Е.А., Серова Н.С. Лучевая диагностика некоторых заболеваний желчного пузыря и внепеченочных желчных протоков. REJR. 2016; 6 (2): 80–90. https://doi.org/10.21569/2222-7415-2016-6-2-80-90Test; Wee D., Izard S., Grimaldi G. et al. EUS assessment for intermediate risk of choledocholithiasis after a negative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Endosc. Ultrasound. 2020; 9 (5): 337–344. https://doi.org/10.4103/eus.eus_57_20Test; Ebrahim M., Sorensen L.T., Jorgensen L.N., Kalaitzakis E. Current clinical algorithm for predicting common bile duct stones have only moderate accuracy. Dig. Endosc. 2018; 30 (4): 477–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.12994Test; Bush A.E.S., Christopoulos P., Jones R.M. et al. Safety, quality and efficiency of intraoperative imaging for treatment decisions in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis without preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Surg. Endosc. 2021; 36 (2): 1206–1214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08389-yTest; Подолужный В.И. Механическая желтуха: принципы диагностики и современного хирургического лечения. Фундаментальная и клиническая медицина. 2018; 3 (2): 82–92. https://doi.org/10/23649/2500-0764-2018-3-2Test- 82-92; Гальперин Э.И., Островская И.М. Контрастное исследование в хирургии желчных путей. М.: Медицина, 1964. 165 с.; Panda N., Chang Y., Chokengarmwong N. et al. Gallstone Pancreatitis and Choledocholithiasis: Using Imaging and Laboratory Trends to Predict the Likelihood of Persistent Stones at Cholangiography. Wld J. Surg. 2018; 42 (10): 3143–3149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4618-6Test; Kadah A., Khoury T., Mahamid M. et al. Predicting common bile duct stones by non-invasive parameters. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2019; 19 (3): 266–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbpd.2019.11.003Test; Kratzer W., Wahl S., Vonend C. et al. Caliber of the common bile duct: effect of cholecystectomy and other factors in a ultrasonograhic study of 8534 patients. Z. Gastroenterol. 2015; 53 (10): 1161–1166. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1399476Test; Beyer G., Kasprowicz F., Hannemann A. et al. Definition of age- dependent reference values for the diameter of the common bile duct and pancreatic duct on MRCP: a population- based, cross- sectional cohort study. Gut. 2023; gutjnl-2021-326106. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2021-326106Test; Govindan S., Tamrat N.E., Liu Z.J. Effect of aging of the common bile duct diameter. Dig. Surg. 2021; 38 (5–6): 368–376. https://doi.org/10.1159/000519446Test; Peng R., Zhang L., Zhang X.M. et al. Common bile duct diameter in an symptomatic population: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Wld J. Radiol. 2015; 7 (12): 501–508. https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v7.i12.501Test; Matcuk G.R. Jr., Grant E., Ralls P.W. Ultrasound Measurements of the Bile Ducts and Gallbladder: Normal Ranges and Effects of Age, Sex, Cholecystectomy, and Pathologic States. Ultrasound Q. 2014; 30 (1): 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0b013e3182a80c98Test; Park J.-S., Lee D.H., Jeong S., Cho S.G. Determination of Diameter and Angulation of the Normal Common Bile Duct using Multidetector Computed Tomography. Gut Liver. 2009; 3 (4): 306–310. https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl.2009.3.4.306Test; Herrera-LeBlanc I.D., Domínguez-Hernández M., Palacios-Saucedo G.C., Herrera-Rivera C.G. Common bile duct diameter by age groups in adult patients without bile duct pathology. Cir Cir. 2022; 90 (4): 503–507. https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.20001391Test; Paudel R.C., Karki S., Suwal S. et al. Comparative Study of Common Bile Duct Diameter between Normal and Post Cholecystectomy Cases Using Trans-abdominal Ultra sonography. Kathmandu Univ. Med. J. 2022; 20 (77): 66–69; Lal N., Mehra S., Lal V. Ultrasonographic measurement of normal common bile duct diameter and its correlation with age, sex and anthropometry. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2014; 8 (12): AC01–04. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/8738.5232Test; Niedarau C., Sonnenberg A., Mueller J. Comparison of the extrahepatic bile duct size measured by ultrasound and by different radiographic methods. Gastroenterology. 1984; 87 (3): 615–621.; Sauerbrei E.E., Cooperberg P.L., Gordon P. The discrepancy between radiographic and sonographic bileduct measurement. Radiology. 1980; 137 (3): 751–755. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.137.3.7444058Test; Wachsberg R.H., Kim K.H., Sundaram K. Sonographic versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiographic measurements of the bile duct revisited: importance of the transverse diameter. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1998; 170 (3): 669–674. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.170.3.9490950Test; Davies R.P., Downey P.R., Moore W.R. et al. Contrast cholangiography versus ultrasonographic measurement of the “extrahepatic” bile duct: a two-fold discrepancy revisited. J. Ultrasound Med. 1991; 10 (12): 653–657. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.1991.10.12.653Test; https://medvis.vidar.ru/jour/article/view/1387Test

  10. 10
    دورية أكاديمية