Endogamia académica en revistas de biblioteconomía y ciencias de la información
العنوان: | Endogamia académica en revistas de biblioteconomía y ciencias de la información |
---|---|
المؤلفون: | Adilson Pinto, Adilson Pinto, Fábio Lorensi do Canto, Fábio Lorensi do Canto, Washington Luis R. de Carvalho Segundo, Washington Luis R. de Carvalho Segundo, Carlos Luis González-Valiente, Carlos Luis González-Valiente, Alexandre Ribas Semeler, Alexandre Ribas Semeler, José Antonio Moreiro González, José Antonio Moreiro González |
المصدر: | Adilson Pinto, Adilson Pinto and Fábio Lorensi do Canto, Fábio Lorensi do Canto and Washington Luis R. de Carvalho Segundo, Washington Luis R. de Carvalho Segundo and Carlos Luis González-Valiente, Carlos Luis González-Valiente and Alexandre Ribas Semeler, Alexandre Ribas Semeler and José Antonio Moreiro González, José Antonio Moreiro González Endogamia académica en revistas de biblioteconomía y ciencias de la información. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología, 2024, vol. 47, n. 2, pp. 1-14. [Journal article (Paginated)] |
بيانات النشر: | Universidad de Antioquia, 2024. |
سنة النشر: | 2024 |
المجموعة: | Status = Published Subject = B. Information use and sociology of information: BG. Information dissemination and diffusion. Subject = E. Publishing and legal issues.: EB. Printing, electronic publishing, broadcasting. Subject = H. Information sources, supports, channels.: HN. e-journals. Type = Journal article (Print/Paginated) Countries = AMERICA: South America: Colombia |
مصطلحات موضوعية: | BG. Information dissemination and diffusion., EB. Printing, electronic publishing, broadcasting., HN. e-journals. |
الوصف: | This study examines the editorial endogeny of Library and Information Science jour-nals. The endogeny was determined by the analysis of (1) papers published by the journal’s editors, (2) papers published by the journal’s country of origin, and (3) jour-nal self-citation. The study used five-year coverage based on journals listed in the Web of Science. Regarding the editorial endogeny, the cut-off line of 50% of publi-cations was at 4.51%. However, some journals have concentrated this endogeny from 20% to 45%. The endogenous model developed with the three analyses generated a journal efficiency system that showed a moderate index by the quartile of the jour-nals, with an average of four endogenous papers per journal. 50% of the publications obtained an average of 10.70% self-citations. But part of the 50% most endogenous journals obtained indices ranging from 11% to 75.99%, with ten journals over 30%. 50% of papers are from the journal’s country of origin. We conclude that the levels of endogeny were balanced on average, but some journals abused it to improve their ranking and impact. |
نوع الوثيقة: | Journal article (Paginated) |
وصف الملف: | text |
اللغة: | English |
الوصول الحر: | http://eprints.rclis.org/45798Test/ |
رقم الانضمام: | edseli.45798 |
قاعدة البيانات: | E-LIS (Eprints in Library & Information Science) |
الوصف غير متاح. |