Decision Tool for Herpes B Virus Antiviral Prophylaxis after Macaque-Related Injuries in Research Laboratory Workers

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Decision Tool for Herpes B Virus Antiviral Prophylaxis after Macaque-Related Injuries in Research Laboratory Workers
المؤلفون: Sapha Barkati, Hashim Ba Taher, Cedric P. Yansouni, Michael Libman, Brian J. Ward, Elizabeth Beauchamp
المصدر: Emerging Infectious Diseases
Emerging Infectious Diseases, Vol 25, Iss 9, Pp 1-6 (2019)
بيانات النشر: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2019.
سنة النشر: 2019
مصطلحات موضوعية: Male, Epidemiology, medicine.medical_treatment, Herpesvirus 1, Cercopithecine, lcsh:Medicine, Macaque, B virus, Cohort Studies, herpes B virus infection, 0302 clinical medicine, Decision Tool for Herpes B Virus Antiviral Prophylaxis after Macaque-Related Injuries in Research Laboratory Workers, Bites and Stings, 030212 general & internal medicine, biology, research laboratory workers, macaque, Quebec, Herpesviridae Infections, Online Report, Infectious Diseases, post-exposure prophylaxis, Female, Adult, Microbiology (medical), Herpes B virus, monkey B virus, medicine.medical_specialty, Decision tool, 030231 tropical medicine, primate workers, Antiviral Agents, lcsh:Infectious and parasitic diseases, Decision Support Techniques, Young Adult, 03 medical and health sciences, biology.animal, medicine, Animals, Humans, lcsh:RC109-216, viruses, Post-exposure prophylaxis, Medical prescription, decision tool, Retrospective Studies, Retrospective review, business.industry, lcsh:R, biology.organism_classification, Occupational Injuries, Laboratory Personnel, Emergency medicine, Macaca, business, macacine alphaherpesvirus 1
الوصف: Macaque-related injuries among primate workers can lead to a potentially fatal B virus encephalomyelitis. We describe a decision tool for evaluating the need for antiviral postexposure prophylaxis and provide a retrospective review of the injuries assessed in our center after its implementation in 2010. Among the injuries studied (n = 251), 40.6% were categorized as high-risk (prophylaxis recommended), 44.2% moderate-risk (consider prophylaxis), and 15.1% low-risk (prophylaxis not recommended). Ten percent of low-risk and 98% of high-risk injuries received prophylaxis (p
تدمد: 1080-6059
1080-6040
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::87fd5ddb4d8e1fdb38e834f72155a41aTest
https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2509.190045Test
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....87fd5ddb4d8e1fdb38e834f72155a41a
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE