يعرض 1 - 10 نتائج من 39 نتيجة بحث عن '"Caballero Lois, Cecília"', وقت الاستعلام: 1.67s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 1
    دورية أكاديمية
  2. 2
    دورية أكاديمية

    وصف الملف: application/pdf; text/html; application/xml

    العلاقة: https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/5220/6287Test; https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/5220/6373Test; https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/5220/6591Test; Núm. 40 , Año 2018 : Enero-Junio; 151; 40; 127; Revista Derecho del Estado; Ahdieh, R. B. (2004). Between dialogue and decree: International review of national courts. New York University Law Review. Vol. 79, n.º 6, 101-228.; Augsberg, I. (2009). The relevance of network models within the juridic discourse. Empirical, sociological, and epistemological perspectives. German Law Journal. Vol. 10, n.º 4, 383-394.; Avbelj, M. (2006). The EU and the many faces of legal pluralism toward a coherent or uniform EU legal order? Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, University of Zagreb. Vol. 2, 377-391.; Bastos Jr., L. M. P. (2000). Possui a União Européia uma autêntica constituição? Um breve esboço sobre a natureza jurídica dos tratados de integração e o problema da legitimidade democrática. Revista de Informação Legislativa, Brasília. Vol. 37, n.º 147, 145-160.; Bastos Jr., L. M. P. (2011). Constituição, quo vadis? Por um constitucionalismo da diferença como resposta aos desafios contemporâneos à teoria constitucional. Tese em Direito. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis.; Berman, P. S. (2002). The globalization of jurisdiction. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. Vol. 151, n.º 2, 311-529.; Berman, P. S. (2005). Towards a cosmopolitan vision of conflict of laws: Redefining governmental interests in a global era. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. Vol. 153, n.º 6, 1819-1882.; Berman, P. S. (2007). Global legal pluralism. Southern California Law Review. Vol. 80, n.º 6, 1155-1237.; Calliess, Ch. (2009). Europe as Transnational Law – The Transnationalization of Values by European Law. German Law Journal. Vol. 10, n.º 10.; Caporaso, J. (2000). Changes in the Westphalian order: territory, public authority, and sovereignity. En: Capo raso, J. (org.). Continuity and change in the Westphalian order. Malden, usa; Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1-28. Castells, M. (2003). A sociedade em rede. 7.ª ed. São Paulo: Paz e Terra.; Cottier, Th. (2009). Multilayered governance, pluralism, and moral conflict. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies. Vol. 16, n.º 2, 647-679.; De Sousa Santos, B. (2000). Para um novo senso comum: a ciência, o direito e a política na transição paradigmática. São Paulo: Cortez. Vol. 1: “A crítica da razão indolente: contra o desperdício da experiência”.; Dupret, B. (2007). Legal pluralism, plurality of laws, and legal practices: Theories, critiques, and praxiological re-specification. European Journal of Legal Studies, European University Institute. Vol. 1, n.º 2.; Fraser, N. (2009). Reenquadrando a justiça em um mundo globalizado. Lua Nova: revista de cultura e política. cedec, n.º 77, 11-39.; Gomes Canotilho, J. J. (2008). “Brancosos” e interconstitucionalidade: itinerários dos discursos sobre a historicidade constitucional. 2.ª ed. Coimbra: Almedina.; Griffiths, J. (1986). What is legal pluralism? The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, University of Birmingham. Vol. 24, 1-55.; Gunther, K. (2008). Legal pluralism or uniform concept of law? Globalisation as a problema of legal theory. No Foundations: Journal of Extreme Legal Positivism, Helsinki, n.º 5, 5-21.; Häberle, P. (1998). Libertad, igualdad, fraternidad: 1789 como historia, actualidad y futuro del Estado constitucional. Madrid: Trotta.; Häberle, P. (2007). Estado constitucional cooperativo. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar.; Joerges, Ch. (2005). Rethinking European Law’s Supremacy: A Plea for a Supranational Conflict of Laws. eui Working Paper Law, European University Institute, Florence, Paper n.º 2005/12.; Joerges, Ch. (2006). Constitutionalism in Postnational constellations: Contrasting social regulation in the EU and in the wto. En: Joerges, C. y Petersmann, E-U. (eds.). Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and Social Regulation. Oxford, Portland: Hart, 491-527.; Petersmann, E.-U. (2007). Conflict of laws as constitutional form: Reflections on the International Trade Law and the Biotech Panel Report. reco n Online Working Paper Series, Working Paper n.º 2007/03.; Petersmann, E.-U. (2010). The idea of three-dimensional conflicts law as constitutional form. reco n Online Working Paper Series, Working Paper n.º 2010/05, 2010.; Komárek, J. (2010). Institutional Dimension of Constitutional Pluralism. Eric Stein Working Paper, Czech Society for European and Comparative Law, Paper n.º 3.; Kontopo ulos, K. M. (1993). The logics of social structure. Cambridge: Cambridge.; Koskenniemi, M. (2006). Fragmentation of internacional Law: difficulties arising from the diversification and expansion of International Law. Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission. Geneva, 1 May-9 June and 3 July-11 August. Identificação: A/CN.4/L.682; Kovziridz, T. (2009). Hierarchy and Interdependence in Multi-level Structures: Foreign and European Relations of Belgian, German and Austrian Federated Entities. Brussels: vub Press.; Krisch, N. (2009). The case for pluralism in postnational law. lse Law, Society and Economy Working Papers, London School of Economics and Political Science, n.º 12.; Kumm, M. (1999). Who is the final arbiter of constitutionality in Europe?: Three conceptions of the relationship between the German constitutional court and the European Court of Justice. Common Market Law Review. Vol. 36, n.º 2, 351-386.; Kumm, M. (2006). Democratic constitutionalism encounters international law: terms of engagement. En: Choudhry, S. The migration of constitutional ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge, 256-293.; Kumm, M. (2009). The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism: On the Relationship between Constitutionalism in and beyond the State. En: Dunoff, J. y Trachtman, J. (eds). Ruling the world? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge, 258-325.; Lachmayer, K. (2007). The international Constitutional Law approach: An introduction to a new perspective on constitutional challenges in a globalizing world. The Vienna Online Journal on International Constitutional Law. Vol. 1, n.º 2, 91-99.; Litfin, K. T. (1997). Sovereignty in world ecopolitics. Mershon International Studies Review, The International Studies Association. Vol. 41, n.º 2, 167-204.; MacCormick, N. (1993). Beyond the Sovereign State. The Modern Law Review. Vol. 56, n.º 1, 1-18.; MacCormick, N. (1995). The Maastricht-Urteil: Sovereignty now. European Law Journal. Vol. 1, n.º 3, 259-266.; MacCormick, N. (1999). Questioning sovereignty: Law, State, and practical reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.; Maduro, M. P. (2003). Contrapunctual law: Europe’s constitutional pluralism in action. En: Walker, N. (ed.). Sovereignty in transition. Oxford, Portland: Hart, 501-537.; Maduro, M. P. (2006). A constituição plural: constitucionalismo e União Européia. Cascais: Principia.; Maduro, M. P. (2008). Interpreting european law - Judicial adjudication in a context of constitutional pluralism. Working Paper IE Law School, European University Institute, WPLS08-02. Disponible en: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1134503Test; Maduro, M. P. (2009). Courts and Pluralism: Essay on a Theory of Judicial Adjudication in the Context of Legal and Constitutional Pluralism. En: Dunoff, J. y Trachtman, J. (eds.). Ruling the world? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge, 356-379.; Mayer, F. (2006). The European Constitution and the Courts. En: Von Bogdandy, A. y Bast, J. (eds.). Principles of European Constitutional Law. Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law. Oxford; Portland: Hart Publishing, 281-333.; Neves, M. (1994). A constitucionalização simbólica. São Paulo: Acadêmica.; Neves, M. (1995). Constitucionalização simbólica e desconstitucionalização fática: mudança simbólica da constituição e permanência das estruturas reais de poder. Revista Trimestral de Direito Público, São Paulo, n.º 12, 156-167.; Neves, M. (2009). Transconstitucionalismo. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.; Pauwelyn, Joost (2004). Bridging fragmentation and unity: International Law as a universe of inter-connected islands. Michigan Journal of International Law. Vol. 25, n.º 4, 903-916.; Peters, A. (2006). Compensatory constitutionalism: The function and potential of fundamental international norms and structures. Leiden Journal of International Law, 19, n.º 3, 579-610.; Peters, A. (2007). The globalization of State constitutions. En: Nollkaemper, A. y Nijma, J. (eds.). New perspectives on the divide between national and international law. Oxford: Oxford, 251-308.; Peters, A. (2009). The Merits of Global Constitutionalism. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies. Vol. 16, n.º 2, 397-411.; Rittberger, V. (2008). Global Governance: From ‘exclusive’ executive multilateralism to inclusive, multipartite institutions. Tübinger Arbeitspapiere zur Internationalen Politik und Friedensforschung, Institut für Politikwissenschaft Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Paper n.º 52.; Rosenfeld, M. (2010). The identity of the constitutional subject: Selfhood, citizenship, culture, and community. London-New York: Routledge.; Sweet, A. S. (2000). Governing with judges: constitutional politics in Europe. Oxford: Oxford.; Sweet, A. S. y Mathews, J. (2008). Proportionality, balancing and global constitutionalism. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. Vol. 47, n.º 1, 73-165.; Tamanaha, B. (1995). An analytical map of social scientific approaches to the concept of law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. Vol. 15, n.º 4, 501-535.; Tamanaha, B. (2008). Understanding legal pluralism: past to present, local to global. Legal Studies Research Paper Series, St. John’s University School of Law, Paper n.º 07-0080.; Van Aaken, A. (2009). Defragmentation of Public International Law Through Interpretation: A Methodological Proposal. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies. Vol. 16, n.º 2, 483-512.; Von Bernstorff, J. (2004). The Structural Limitations of Network Governance: icann as a Case in Point. En: Joerges, C.; Sand, I.-J. y Teubner, G. (eds.). Transnational Governance and constitutionalism. Oxford, Portland: Hart, 257-282.; Von Bogdandy, A. (2008). Pluralism, direct effect, and the ultimate say: On the relationship between international and domestic constitutional law. International Journal of Constitutional Law. Vol. 6, n.º 3-4, 397-413.; Von Bogdandy, A.; Wolfrum, R.; Von Bernstorff, J.; Dann, P. y Goldmann, M. (eds.). (2009). The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions: Advancing International Institutional Law. Heildeberg: Springer.; Walker, N. (2008a). Beyond boundaries disputes and basic grids: Mapping the global disorder of normative orders. International Journal of Constitutional Law. Vol. 6, n.º 3-4, 373-396.; Walker, N. (2008b). Taking constitutionalism beyond the State. Political Studies. Vol. 56, n.º 3, 519-543.; Walker, N. (2009). Reframing the EU Constitutionalism. En: Dunoff, J. y Trachtman, J. (eds.). Ruling the world? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge, 149-176.; Wolkmer, A. C. (1997). Pluralismo jurídico: fundamentos de uma nova cultura no direito. São Paulo: Alfa e Ômega.; Zacher, M. W. (2000). Os pilares em ruína do templo de Vestfália. En: Rosenau, J.; Czempiel, E-O. (orgs.). Governança sem governo: ordem e transformação na política mundial. Brasília: UnB; Imprensa Oficial, 83-141.; Zagrebelsky, G. (1995). El derecho dúctil: ley, derechos y justicia. Madrid: Trotta.; Zagrebelsky, G. (2008). El juez en el siglo xxi. Revista Iberoamericana de Derecho Procesal Constitucional, n.º 10, 249-268.; https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/10699Test; https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n40.06Test

  3. 3
  4. 4
    دورية أكاديمية
  5. 5
    دورية أكاديمية
  6. 6
    دورية أكاديمية

    المصدر: Seqüência: estudos jurídicos e políticos, ISSN 2177-7055, Vol. 28, Nº. 55, 2007, pags. 233-252

    مصطلحات موضوعية: Law, Moral, Jürgen Habermas, Direito

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    العلاقة: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4818308Test; (Revista) ISSN 2177-7055

  7. 7
    دورية أكاديمية
  8. 8
    دورية أكاديمية
  9. 9
    دورية أكاديمية

    المؤلفون: Caballero Lois, Cecília

    المصدر: Seqüência: estudos jurídicos e políticos, ISSN 2177-7055, Vol. 20, Nº. 38, 1999, pags. 125-134

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    العلاقة: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4818225Test; (Revista) ISSN 2177-7055

  10. 10
    دورية أكاديمية

    العنوان البديل: Notes on Catharine MacKinnon's legal theory.

    المؤلفون: Ladeira Tavares, Ligia Maria1 ligitavares@gmail.com, Caballero Lois, Cecília2,3,4 cecilialois@gmail.com

    المصدر: Revista de Gênero, Sexualidade e Direito. jul-dez2016, Vol. 2 Issue 2, p151-170. 20p.