المؤلفون: Kastratović Radovan, Bjelić Predrag

المصدر: Ekonomski Anali, Vol 68, Iss 237, Pp 37-68 (2023)

مصطلحات موضوعية: bilateral investment treaties(bit), foreign direct investment (fdi), investment promotion, serbia, Economic growth, development, planning, HD72-88

وصف الملف: electronic resource

العلاقة: https://doaj.org/toc/0013-3264Test; https://doaj.org/toc/1820-7375Test

الوصول الحر: https://doaj.org/article/8b51e13f01604d82b969551a3ebbb3dbTest

المؤلفون: Fathi Al Hayani

المصدر: الرافدین للحقوق, Vol 24, Iss 77, Pp 72-129 (2021)

مصطلحات موضوعية: the international centre for settlement of investment disputes (icsid), ،,؛most-favored nation clause(mfn), ،,؛bilateral investment treaties (bit), Law

وصف الملف: electronic resource

العلاقة: https://alaw.mosuljournals.com/article_170010_ed34e7c8e12d872b5953d8f30d7ecab0.pdfTest; https://doaj.org/toc/1819-1746Test; https://doaj.org/toc/2664-2778Test

الوصول الحر: https://doaj.org/article/1885fecb43cc4c0d9313ca2cb231eff4Test

المؤلفون: Álvarez Contreras, Juan Miguel

المصدر: Revista Derecho del Estado; No. 52 (2022): Mayo - Agosto ; 409-440 ; Revista Derecho del Estado; Núm. 52 (2022): Mayo - Agosto ; Revista Derecho del Estado; No 52 (2022): Mayo - Agosto ; Revista Derecho del Estado; N.º 52 (2022): Mayo - Agosto ; 2346-2051 ; 0122-9893

مصطلحات موضوعية: International Investment Agreements (IIA), Bilateral Investment Treaties (bit), investment chapters in Free Trade Agreements (FTA), right to equal treatment, Colombian Constitutional Court, investor-State investment dispute settlement, Acuerdos internacionales de inversión (AII), tratados bilaterales de inversión (TBI), capítulos de inversión en tratados de libre comercio (TLC), derecho a la igualdad, Corte Constitucional de Colombia, mecanismo inversionista-Estado para la solución de controversias de inversión

وصف الملف: application/pdf; text/html

العلاقة: https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/7807/11691Test; https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/7807/11692Test; Álvarez, G. M., Blasikiewicz, B., Koutouzi, K., Verdegay Mena, A., Mitsi, M., Spiteri-Gonzi, E., van Hoolwerff, T. y Willinski, P. A Response to the Criticism against isds by efila. En Journal of International Arbitration. 33, 1, 2016, 1-36. Disponible en: https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Journal+of+International+Arbitration/33.1/joia2016001Test; Bogdandy, A. von. Pluralism, Direct Effect, and the Ultimate Say: On the Relationship between International and Domestic Constitutional Law. En International Journal of Constitutional Law. Vol. 6, n.º 3-4, 2008, 397-413.; Bonnitcha, J., Poulsen, L. y Waibel, M. The Political Economy of the Investment Treaty Regime. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.; Comisión Europea. Online Public Consultation on Investment Protection and Investor-to-State Dispute Settlement (isds) in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Agreement (Ttip). Swd (2015)3 final, 13 de enero de 2015, 14. Disponible en: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015/january/tradoc_153044.pdfTest; De Mestral, A. y Morgan, R. Does Canadian Law Provide Remedies Equivalent to nafta Chapter 11 Arbitration? CIGI Investor-State Arbitration Series, 2016, Paper n.º 4.; Dodge, W. Investor-State Dispute Settlement between Developed Countries: Reflections on the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement. En Vanderbild Journal of Transnational Law. Vol. 39, 2006, 1-37.; Gallus, N. The Influence of the Host State’s Level of Development on International Investment Treaty Standards of Protection. En Journal of World Investment & Trade. Vol. 6, n.º 5, 2005, 711-730.; Gantz, D. Investor-State Dispute Settlement in US Law, Politics and Practice: The Debate Continues. CIGI Investor-State Arbitration Series, 2015, Paper n.º 9.; García-Castrillón, C. Spain and Investment Arbitration: The Renewable Energy Explosion. CIGI Investor-State Arbitration Series, 2017, Paper n.º 17.; Hamamoto, S. Debates in Japan over Investor-State Arbitration with Developed States. CIGI Investor-State Arbitration, 2016, Paper n.º 5.; Hanf, D. ‘Reverse Discrimination’ in EU Law: Constitutional Aberration, Constitutional Necessity, or Judicial Choice. En Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. Vol. 18, n.º 1-2, 2011, 29-61; Hepburn, J. Domestic Law in International Investment Arbitration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.; Iglesias, S. Purely Internal Situations and the Limits of EU Law: A Consolidated Case Law or a Notion to be Abandoned? En European Constitutional Law Review. Vol. 14, 2018, 7-36.; Insignares-Cera, S. y Molinares-Hassan, V. Juicio integrado de constitucionalidad. Análisis de la metodología utilizada por la Corte Constitucional colombiana. En Vniversitas. Vol. 61, n.º 124, 2012, 91-118.; Islam, R. The Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET) Standard in International Investment Arbitration. Singapur: Springer, 2018.; Johnson, L., Sachs, L. y Sachs, J. Investor-State Dispute Settlement, Public Interest and U.S. Domestic Law. ccsi Policy Paper, 2015.; Johnson, L. y Volkov, O. Investor-State Contracts, Host-State “Commitments” and the Myth of Stability in International Law. En The American Review of International Arbitration. Vol. 24, n.º 3, 2013, 361-415.; Kaushal, A. Revisiting History: How the Past Matters for the Present Backlash against the Foreign Investment Regime. En Harvard International Law Journal. Vol. 50, n.º 2, 2009, 491-534.; Kläger, R. ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’ in International Investment Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.; Kleinheisterkamp, J. y Poulsen, L. Investment Protection in TTIP: Three Feasible Proposals. GEG & BSG Policy Brief, 2014.; McRae, D. The Legal Effect of Interpretative Declarations. En British Yearbook of International Law. Vol. 49, n.º 1, 60, 1978, 155-173.; Montt, S. Aplicación de los tratados bilaterales de protección de inversiones por tribunales chilenos. Responsabilidad del Estado y expropiaciones regulatorias en un mundo crecientemente globalizado. En Revista Chilena de Derecho. Vol. 32, n.º 1, 2005, 19-78.; Nelson M. Declarations, Statements and ‘Disguised Reservations’ with Respect to the Convention on the Law of the Sea. En International and Comparative Law Quarterly. Vol. 50, n.º 4, 2001, 767-786.; Newcombe, A. y Paradell, L. Law and Practice of Investment Treaties: Standards of Treatment. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2009.; Pohl, J., Mashigo, K. y Nohen, A. Dispute Settlement Provisions in International Investment Agreements: A Large Sample Survey. OECD Working Papers on International Investment, 2012/02, OECD Publishing.; Poiares, M. The Scope of European Remedies: The Case of Purely Internal Situations and Reverse Discrimination. En Skidmore, P., Novitz, T. y Kilpatrick, C. (eds.), The Future of Remedies in Europe. Oxford: Hart, 2000.; Polanco, R. The No of Tokyo Revisited: Or How Developed Countries Learned to Start Worrying and Love the Calvo Doctrine. En icsid Review. Vol. 30, n.º 1, 2015, 172-193.; Poulsen, L., Bonnitcha, J. y Yackee, J. Costs and Benefits of an EU-USA Investment Protection Treaty. En lse Enterprise, 2013.; Rodríguez, C. y Rodríguez, D. ¿Es constitucional el TLC? En Boletín del Observatorio de Derechos Sociales y Políticas Públicas, Dejusticia. N.º 1, 2007.; Root, E. Basis of Protection to Citizens Residing Abroad. En American Journal of International Law. Vol. 4, n.º 3, 1910, 521-522.; Schill, S. Reforming Investor-State Dispute Settlement: A (Comparative and International) Constitutional Law Framework. En Journal of International Economic Law. Vol. 20, n.º 3, 2017, 652-657.; Schønberg, S. Legitimate Expectations in Administrative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.; Sornarajah, M. The International Law on Foreign Investment. 3.ª ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.; Trakman, L. Investor State Arbitration or Local Courts: Will Australia Set a New Trend? En Journal of World Trade. Vol. 46, n.º 1, 2012, 83-120.; Tryfonidou, A. Reverse Discrimination in Purely Internal Situations: An Incongruity in an Citizens’ Europe. En Legal Issues of Economic Integration. Vol. 35, n.º 1, 2008, 43-67.; UNCTAD. Expropriation. UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements ii. Nueva York y Ginebra: Naciones Unidas, 2012.; UNCTAD. Bilateral Investment Treaties 1959-1999. UNCTAD/ITE/IIA/2. Nueva York y Ginebra: Naciones Unidas, 2000.; Van Harten, G. The EU-Canada Joint Interpretive Declaration/Instrument on the CETA Updated Comments. Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper 6. Vol. 13, n.º 2, 2017.; Verbist, V. Reverse Discrimination in the European Union. A Recurring Balancing Act. Cambridge: Intersentia, 2017.; Yackee, J. New Trade Agreements Don’t Need ISDS. CATO Unbound, 19 de mayo de 2015. Disponible en: https://www.cato-unbound.org/2015/05/19/jason-yackee/new-tradeagreements-dont-need-isds#_edn1Test; Yannaca-Small, K. Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard. En Yannaca-Small, K. (ed.), Arbitration under International Investment Agreements. A Guide to Key Issues. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.; Zeyl, T. Charting the Wrong Course: The Doctrine of Legitimate Expectations in Investment Treaty Law. En Alberta Law Review. Vol. 49, n.º 1, 2011, 203-235.; https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/7807Test

الإتاحة: https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/7807Test

المؤلفون: Alvarez Contreras, Juan Miguel

المصدر: https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/7807Test.

مصطلحات موضوعية: International Investment Agreements (IIA), Bilateral Investment Treaties (bit), investment chapters in Free Trade Agreements (FTA), right to equal treatment, Colombian Constitutional Court, investor-State investment dispute settlement, Acuerdos internacionales de inversión (AII), tratados bilaterales de inversión (TBI), capítulos de inversión en tratados de libre comercio (TLC), derecho a la igualdad, Corte Constitucional de Colombia, mecanismo inversionista-Estado para la solución de controversias de inversión

وصف الملف: application/pdf; text/html

العلاقة: https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/7807/11691Test; https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/7807/11692Test; Núm. 52 , Año 2022 : Mayo - Agosto; 440; 52; 409; Revista Derecho del Estado; Álvarez, G. M., Blasikiewicz, B., Koutouzi, K., Verdegay Mena, A., Mitsi, M., Spiteri-Gonzi, E., van Hoolwerff, T. y Willinski, P. A Response to the Criticism against isds by efila. En Journal of International Arbitration. 33, 1, 2016, 1-36. Disponible en: https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Journal+of+International+Arbitration/33.1/joia2016001Test; Bogdandy, A. von. Pluralism, Direct Effect, and the Ultimate Say: On the Relationship between International and Domestic Constitutional Law. En International Journal of Constitutional Law. Vol. 6, n.º 3-4, 2008, 397-413.; Bonnitcha, J., Poulsen, L. y Waibel, M. The Political Economy of the Investment Treaty Regime. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.; Comisión Europea. Online Public Consultation on Investment Protection and Investor-to-State Dispute Settlement (isds) in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Agreement (Ttip). Swd (2015)3 final, 13 de enero de 2015, 14. Disponible en: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015/january/tradoc_153044.pdfTest; De Mestral, A. y Morgan, R. Does Canadian Law Provide Remedies Equivalent to nafta Chapter 11 Arbitration? CIGI Investor-State Arbitration Series, 2016, Paper n.º 4.; Dodge, W. Investor-State Dispute Settlement between Developed Countries: Reflections on the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement. En Vanderbild Journal of Transnational Law. Vol. 39, 2006, 1-37.; Gallus, N. The Influence of the Host State’s Level of Development on International Investment Treaty Standards of Protection. En Journal of World Investment & Trade. Vol. 6, n.º 5, 2005, 711-730.; Gantz, D. Investor-State Dispute Settlement in US Law, Politics and Practice: The Debate Continues. CIGI Investor-State Arbitration Series, 2015, Paper n.º 9.; García-Castrillón, C. Spain and Investment Arbitration: The Renewable Energy Explosion. CIGI Investor-State Arbitration Series, 2017, Paper n.º 17.; Hamamoto, S. Debates in Japan over Investor-State Arbitration with Developed States. CIGI Investor-State Arbitration, 2016, Paper n.º 5.; Hanf, D. ‘Reverse Discrimination’ in EU Law: Constitutional Aberration, Constitutional Necessity, or Judicial Choice. En Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. Vol. 18, n.º 1-2, 2011, 29-61; Hepburn, J. Domestic Law in International Investment Arbitration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.; Iglesias, S. Purely Internal Situations and the Limits of EU Law: A Consolidated Case Law or a Notion to be Abandoned? En European Constitutional Law Review. Vol. 14, 2018, 7-36.; Insignares-Cera, S. y Molinares-Hassan, V. Juicio integrado de constitucionalidad. Análisis de la metodología utilizada por la Corte Constitucional colombiana. En Vniversitas. Vol. 61, n.º 124, 2012, 91-118.; Islam, R. The Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET) Standard in International Investment Arbitration. Singapur: Springer, 2018.; Johnson, L., Sachs, L. y Sachs, J. Investor-State Dispute Settlement, Public Interest and U.S. Domestic Law. ccsi Policy Paper, 2015.; Johnson, L. y Volkov, O. Investor-State Contracts, Host-State “Commitments” and the Myth of Stability in International Law. En The American Review of International Arbitration. Vol. 24, n.º 3, 2013, 361-415.; Kaushal, A. Revisiting History: How the Past Matters for the Present Backlash against the Foreign Investment Regime. En Harvard International Law Journal. Vol. 50, n.º 2, 2009, 491-534.; Kläger, R. ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’ in International Investment Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.; Kleinheisterkamp, J. y Poulsen, L. Investment Protection in TTIP: Three Feasible Proposals. GEG & BSG Policy Brief, 2014.; McRae, D. The Legal Effect of Interpretative Declarations. En British Yearbook of International Law. Vol. 49, n.º 1, 60, 1978, 155-173.; Montt, S. Aplicación de los tratados bilaterales de protección de inversiones por tribunales chilenos. Responsabilidad del Estado y expropiaciones regulatorias en un mundo crecientemente globalizado. En Revista Chilena de Derecho. Vol. 32, n.º 1, 2005, 19-78.; Nelson M. Declarations, Statements and ‘Disguised Reservations’ with Respect to the Convention on the Law of the Sea. En International and Comparative Law Quarterly. Vol. 50, n.º 4, 2001, 767-786.; Newcombe, A. y Paradell, L. Law and Practice of Investment Treaties: Standards of Treatment. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2009.; Pohl, J., Mashigo, K. y Nohen, A. Dispute Settlement Provisions in International Investment Agreements: A Large Sample Survey. OECD Working Papers on International Investment, 2012/02, OECD Publishing.; Poiares, M. The Scope of European Remedies: The Case of Purely Internal Situations and Reverse Discrimination. En Skidmore, P., Novitz, T. y Kilpatrick, C. (eds.), The Future of Remedies in Europe. Oxford: Hart, 2000.; Polanco, R. The No of Tokyo Revisited: Or How Developed Countries Learned to Start Worrying and Love the Calvo Doctrine. En icsid Review. Vol. 30, n.º 1, 2015, 172-193.; Poulsen, L., Bonnitcha, J. y Yackee, J. Costs and Benefits of an EU-USA Investment Protection Treaty. En lse Enterprise, 2013.; Rodríguez, C. y Rodríguez, D. ¿Es constitucional el TLC? En Boletín del Observatorio de Derechos Sociales y Políticas Públicas, Dejusticia. N.º 1, 2007.; Root, E. Basis of Protection to Citizens Residing Abroad. En American Journal of International Law. Vol. 4, n.º 3, 1910, 521-522.; Schill, S. Reforming Investor-State Dispute Settlement: A (Comparative and International) Constitutional Law Framework. En Journal of International Economic Law. Vol. 20, n.º 3, 2017, 652-657.; Schønberg, S. Legitimate Expectations in Administrative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.; Sornarajah, M. The International Law on Foreign Investment. 3.ª ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.; Trakman, L. Investor State Arbitration or Local Courts: Will Australia Set a New Trend? En Journal of World Trade. Vol. 46, n.º 1, 2012, 83-120.; Tryfonidou, A. Reverse Discrimination in Purely Internal Situations: An Incongruity in an Citizens’ Europe. En Legal Issues of Economic Integration. Vol. 35, n.º 1, 2008, 43-67.; UNCTAD. Expropriation. UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements ii. Nueva York y Ginebra: Naciones Unidas, 2012.; UNCTAD. Bilateral Investment Treaties 1959-1999. UNCTAD/ITE/IIA/2. Nueva York y Ginebra: Naciones Unidas, 2000.; Van Harten, G. The EU-Canada Joint Interpretive Declaration/Instrument on the CETA Updated Comments. Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper 6. Vol. 13, n.º 2, 2017.; Verbist, V. Reverse Discrimination in the European Union. A Recurring Balancing Act. Cambridge: Intersentia, 2017.; Yackee, J. New Trade Agreements Don’t Need ISDS. CATO Unbound, 19 de mayo de 2015. Disponible en: https://www.cato-unbound.org/2015/05/19/jason-yackee/new-tradeagreements-dont-need-isds#_edn1Test; Yannaca-Small, K. Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard. En Yannaca-Small, K. (ed.), Arbitration under International Investment Agreements. A Guide to Key Issues. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.; Zeyl, T. Charting the Wrong Course: The Doctrine of Legitimate Expectations in Investment Treaty Law. En Alberta Law Review. Vol. 49, n.º 1, 2011, 203-235.; https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/11490Test; https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n52.13Test

الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n52.13Test
https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/11490Test

المؤلفون: Widhayani Dian Pawestri

المصدر: Yuridika, Vol 1, Iss 7, Pp 101-118 (2016)

مصطلحات موضوعية: Kepentingan nasional, Penanaman Modal Asing, Bilateral Investment Treaties (BIT), Private international law. Conflict of laws, K7000-7720, Jurisprudence. Philosophy and theory of law, K201-487

وصف الملف: electronic resource

العلاقة: http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/index.php/YDK/article/view/1961Test; https://doaj.org/toc/0215-840XTest; https://doaj.org/toc/2528-3103Test

الوصول الحر: https://doaj.org/article/cfa537a1ca7b42b0891d3818742d6074Test

المؤلفون: Djigsa, Wakgari Kebeta

المصدر: Haramaya Law Review; Vol 6, No 1 (2017); 67-90 ; 2305-3739 ; 2227-2178

مصطلحات موضوعية: Bilateral investment treaties (BIT), environment, Ethiopia, fair and equitable treatment, foreign direct investment (FDI), regulatory space

وصف الملف: application/pdf

العلاقة: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/hlr/article/view/165536/154995Test; https://www.ajol.info/index.php/hlr/article/view/165536Test

الإتاحة: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/hlr/article/view/165536Test

المؤلفون: Aira González, Patricia

المصدر: Revista de Derecho de la UNED (RDUNED); Núm. 20 (2017); 237-262 ; 2255-3436 ; 1886-9912 ; 10.5944/rduned.20.2017

مصطلحات موضوعية: derecho internacional, empresa transnacional como sujeto del Derecho internacional, empresa transnacional, derechos humanos, arbitraje internacional, inversión extranjera, acuerdos bilaterales de inversión (BIT), international law, transnational company as subject of International law, transnational company, human rights, international arbitration, foreign investment, bilateral investment treaties (BIT)

وصف الملف: application/pdf

العلاقة: https://revistas.uned.es/index.php/RDUNED/article/view/19474/16310Test; https://revistas.uned.es/index.php/RDUNED/article/view/19474Test

الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.5944/rduned.20.2017.19474Test
https://doi.org/10.5944/rduned.20.2017Test
https://revistas.uned.es/index.php/RDUNED/article/view/19474Test

المؤلفون: Juan Miguel Alvarez Contreras

مصطلحات موضوعية: investment chapters in Free Trade Agreements (FTA), mecanismo inversionista-Estado para la solución de controversias de inversión, Bilateral Investment Treaties (bit), International Investment Agreements (IIA), derecho a la igualdad, Corte Constitucional de Colombia, right to equal treatment, investor-State investment dispute settlement, capítulos de inversión en tratados de libre comercio (TLC), Colombian Constitutional Court, Law, Acuerdos internacionales de inversión (AII), tratados bilaterales de inversión (TBI)

وصف الملف: application/pdf; text/html

الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::f71667d7edb4077d2d0c132ecb2e4528Test
https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/11490Test

المؤلفون: Pawestri, Widhayani Dian

المصدر: Yuridika; Vol. 31 No. 1 (2016): Volume 31 No 1 Januari 2016; 143 – 166 ; 2528-3103 ; 0215-840X

مصطلحات موضوعية: National Interest, Foreign Direct Invetment, Bilateral Investment Treaties (BIT)

وصف الملف: application/pdf

العلاقة: https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/article/view/1961/pdf_1Test; https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/article/view/1961Test

الإتاحة: https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/article/view/1961Test

المؤلفون: Byung Min, Sudesh Mujumdar, Jong Rhim

المصدر: Global Business and Finance Review, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp 75-87 (2011)

مصطلحات موضوعية: bilateral investment treaties(bit), fdi, coefficient panel models, Business, HF5001-6182, Finance, HG1-9999

وصف الملف: electronic resource

العلاقة: http://www.gbfrjournal.org/pds/journal/thesis/20150622133410-RGTQN.pdfTest; https://doaj.org/toc/1088-6931Test; https://doaj.org/toc/2384-1648Test

الوصول الحر: https://doaj.org/article/054aaba438ac4fb2b1421ab0c0b3e57bTest