Endogamia académica en revistas de biblioteconomía y ciencias de la información

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Endogamia académica en revistas de biblioteconomía y ciencias de la información
المؤلفون: Adilson Pinto, Adilson Pinto, Fábio Lorensi do Canto, Fábio Lorensi do Canto, Washington Luis R. de Carvalho Segundo, Washington Luis R. de Carvalho Segundo, Carlos Luis González-Valiente, Carlos Luis González-Valiente, Alexandre Ribas Semeler, Alexandre Ribas Semeler, José Antonio Moreiro González, José Antonio Moreiro González
المصدر: Adilson Pinto, Adilson Pinto and Fábio Lorensi do Canto, Fábio Lorensi do Canto and Washington Luis R. de Carvalho Segundo, Washington Luis R. de Carvalho Segundo and Carlos Luis González-Valiente, Carlos Luis González-Valiente and Alexandre Ribas Semeler, Alexandre Ribas Semeler and José Antonio Moreiro González, José Antonio Moreiro González Endogamia académica en revistas de biblioteconomía y ciencias de la información. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología, 2024, vol. 47, n. 2, pp. 1-14. [Journal article (Paginated)]
بيانات النشر: Universidad de Antioquia, 2024.
سنة النشر: 2024
المجموعة: Status = Published
Subject = B. Information use and sociology of information: BG. Information dissemination and diffusion.
Subject = E. Publishing and legal issues.: EB. Printing, electronic publishing, broadcasting.
Subject = H. Information sources, supports, channels.: HN. e-journals.
Type = Journal article (Print/Paginated)
Countries = AMERICA: South America: Colombia
مصطلحات موضوعية: BG. Information dissemination and diffusion., EB. Printing, electronic publishing, broadcasting., HN. e-journals.
الوصف: This study examines the editorial endogeny of Library and Information Science jour-nals. The endogeny was determined by the analysis of (1) papers published by the journal’s editors, (2) papers published by the journal’s country of origin, and (3) jour-nal self-citation. The study used five-year coverage based on journals listed in the Web of Science. Regarding the editorial endogeny, the cut-off line of 50% of publi-cations was at 4.51%. However, some journals have concentrated this endogeny from 20% to 45%. The endogenous model developed with the three analyses generated a journal efficiency system that showed a moderate index by the quartile of the jour-nals, with an average of four endogenous papers per journal. 50% of the publications obtained an average of 10.70% self-citations. But part of the 50% most endogenous journals obtained indices ranging from 11% to 75.99%, with ten journals over 30%. 50% of papers are from the journal’s country of origin. We conclude that the levels of endogeny were balanced on average, but some journals abused it to improve their ranking and impact.
نوع الوثيقة: Journal article (Paginated)
وصف الملف: text
اللغة: English
الوصول الحر: http://eprints.rclis.org/45798Test/
رقم الانضمام: edseli.45798
قاعدة البيانات: E-LIS (Eprints in Library & Information Science)