Intermittent Catheterization: The Devil Is in the Details
| العنوان: | Intermittent Catheterization: The Devil Is in the Details |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Vanessa K. Noonan, Matthias Walter, Andrei V. Krassioukov, Nader Fallah, Kathleen Christison, Jean-Jacques Wyndaele, Michael J. Kennelly, Thomas M. Kessler |
| المساهمون: | University of Zurich, Krassioukov, Andrei V |
| المصدر: | Journal of Neurotrauma Journal of neurotrauma |
| بيانات النشر: | Mary Ann Liebert Inc, 2018. |
| سنة النشر: | 2018 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | medicine.medical_specialty, intermittent catheterization, Short Communication, Urinary system, Cochrane review, education, Clinical Neurology, 030232 urology & nephrology, Alternative medicine, 610 Medicine & health, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Intermittent catheterisation, Medicine, Intensive care medicine, Spinal cord injury, business.industry, Bladder management, Outcome measures, medicine.disease, spinal cord injury, 3. Good health, Clinical neurology, 2728 Neurology (clinical), Physical therapy, 10046 Balgrist University Hospital, Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Center, Human medicine, Neurology (clinical), urinary tract infection, business, neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction, Healthcare providers, 030217 neurology & neurosurgery |
| الوصف: | During the last few years, the international community debated urinary tract infection and re-use of catheters when managing neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) among individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). In this respect, the 2014 Cochrane review by Prieto and colleagues, "Intermittent catheterisation for long-term bladder management," became one of the leading documents that captured the minds and attention of clinicians around the world. Although numerous countries had switched to single-use catheters for management of NLUTD following SCI, the opinion that was expressed in the 2014 Cochrane review had a strong influence on healthcare providers and agencies to recommend re-use of catheters. However, many clinicians have expressed concern regarding the conclusions in the 2014 Cochrane review by Prieto and colleagues. We therefore conducted an independent appraisal of the data and analyses presented in the review. Our appraisal identified crucial discrepancies of data extraction and analyses within the review. In appraisal to that of Prieto and colleagues' review, our analysis revealed a trend to favor single over multiple use of catheters. After addressing our concerns to Cochrane's acting Editor-in-Chief, the most recent version of the 2014 Cochrane review was withdrawn from publication. |
| وصف الملف: | |
| تدمد: | 1557-9042 0897-7151 |
| الوصول الحر: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::228371f5305854029434f221529a7f4fTest https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2017.5413Test |
| حقوق: | OPEN |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsair.doi.dedup.....228371f5305854029434f221529a7f4f |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
| تدمد: | 15579042 08977151 |
|---|