دورية أكاديمية

Nitric acid measurements at Eureka obtained in winter 2001-2002 using solar and lunar Fourier transform infrared absorption spectroscopy: Comparisons with observations at Thule and Kiruna and with results from three-dimensional models

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Nitric acid measurements at Eureka obtained in winter 2001-2002 using solar and lunar Fourier transform infrared absorption spectroscopy: Comparisons with observations at Thule and Kiruna and with results from three-dimensional models
المساهمون: Farahani, Elham (author), Fast, H. (author), Mittermeier, R. (author), Makino, Y. (author), Strong, K. (author), McLandress, C. (author), Shepherd, T. (author), Chipperfield, M. (author), Hannigan, James (author), Coffey, Michael (author), Mikuteit, S. (author), Hase, F. (author), Blumenstock, T. (author), Raffalski, U. (author)
بيانات النشر: American Geophysical Union
سنة النشر: 2007
المجموعة: OpenSky (NCAR/UCAR - National Center for Atmospheric Research / University Corporation for Atmospheric Research)
الوصف: For the first time, vertical column measurements of nitric acid (HNO₂) above Eureka (80.1°N, 86.4°W), Canada, have been made during polar night using lunar spectra recorded with a Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer, from October 2001 to March 2002. This site is part of the primary Arctic station of the Network for the Detection of Stratospheric Change. These measurements were compared with FTIR measurements at two other Arctic sites: Thule, Greenland (76.5°N, 68.8°W), and Kiruna, Sweden (67.8°N, 20.4°E). Eureka lunar measurements are in good agreement with solar ones made with the same instrument. Eureka and Thule HNO₃ columns are consistent within measurement error. Differences between HNO₃ columns at Kiruna and those at Eureka and Thule can be explained on the basis of available sunlight hours and location of the polar vortex. The measurements were also compared with results from a chemistry-climate model, the Canadian Middle Atmosphere Model (CMAM), and from a three-dimensional chemical transport model, SLIMCAT. This is the first time that CMAM HNO₃ columns have been compared with observations in the Arctic. The comparison of CMAM HNO₃ columns with Eureka and Kiruna data shows good agreement. The warm 2001-2002 winter with almost no polar stratospheric clouds makes the comparison with this version of CMAM, which has a known warm bias, a good test for CMAM under these conditions. SLIMCAT captures the magnitude of HNO₃ columns at Eureka, and the day-to-day variability, but generally reports higher values than were measured at Thule and Kiruna.
نوع الوثيقة: article in journal/newspaper
وصف الملف: application/pdf
اللغة: English
العلاقة: Journal of Geophysical Research; http://nldr.library.ucar.edu/repository/collections/OSGC-000-000-003-931Test; ark:/85065/d73f4pvj
DOI: 10.1029/2006JD007096
الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007096Test
http://nldr.library.ucar.edu/repository/collections/OSGC-000-000-003-931Test
حقوق: Copyright 2007 American Geophysical Union.
رقم الانضمام: edsbas.9DFAEBE4
قاعدة البيانات: BASE