-
81دورية أكاديمية
المؤلفون: Leon D. Young
المصدر: European Journal of Futures Research, Vol 6, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2018)
مصطلحات موضوعية: Systems thinking, National strategy, Scenario development, Security policy, Options analysis, Foresight, Political science, Social sciences (General), H1-99
وصف الملف: electronic resource
العلاقة: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40309-018-0138-8Test; https://doaj.org/toc/2195-4194Test; https://doaj.org/toc/2195-2248Test
-
82دورية أكاديمية
-
83دورية أكاديمية
المؤلفون: Christoph D. D. RUPPRECHT, Kazuhiko OTA, Mai KOBAYASHI, Maximilian SPIEGELBERG, Norie TAMURA, Steven R. MCGREEVY, スピーゲルバーグ マキシミリアン, マックグリービー スティーブンR., ルプレヒト クリストフD. D., 太田 和彦, 小林 舞, 田村 典江
المصدر: 環境科学会誌 / ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE. 2021, 34(2):46
-
84مؤتمر
المؤلفون: Vreys, Kim, Lizin, Sebastien, Van Dael, Miet, Tharakan, Joe, Malina, Robert
مصطلحات موضوعية: forecasting, Delphi, scenario development, carbon capture and utilization
وصف الملف: application/vnd.ms-powerpoint
العلاقة: 1. Styring, P., E.A. Quadrelli, and K. Armstrong, Carbon dioxide utilisation: closing the carbon cycle. 2014: Elsevier. 2. Hunt, A.J., et al., Generation, Capture, and Utilization of Industrial Carbon Dioxide. ChemSusChem, 2010. 3(3): p. 306-322. 3. Aresta, M., A. Dibenedetto, and A. Angelini, The changing paradigm in CO2 utilization. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 2013. 3–4: p. 65-73. 4. Al-Mamoori, A., et al., Carbon capture and utilization update. Energy Technology, 2017. 5. Markewitz, P., et al., Worldwide innovations in the development of carbon capture technologies and the utilization of CO 2. Energy & environmental science, 2012. 5(6): p. 7281-7305. 6. Bruhn, T., H. Naims, and B. Olfe-Kräutlein, Separating the debate on CO2 utilisation from carbon capture and storage. Environmental Science & Policy, 2016. 60: p. 38-43. 7. Najera, M., et al., Carbon capture and utilization via chemical looping dry reforming. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2011. 89(9): p. 1533-1543. 8. Khoo, H.H., et al., Carbon capture and utilization: Preliminary life cycle CO2, energy, and cost results of potential mineral carbonation. Energy Procedia, 2011. 4: p. 2494-2501. 9. Yu, K.M.K., et al., Recent Advances in CO2 Capture and Utilization. ChemSusChem, 2008. 1(11): p. 893-899. 10. Sayre, R., Microalgae: The Potential for Carbon Capture. BioScience, 2010. 60(9): p. 722-727. 11. Riduan, S.N. and Y. Zhang, Recent developments in carbon dioxide utilization under mild conditions. Dalton Transactions, 2010. 39(14): p. 3347-3357. 12. Kang, D., et al., Carbon capture and utilization using industrial wastewater under ambient conditions. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017. 308: p. 1073-1080. 13. Blanken, W., et al., Optimizing carbon dioxide utilization for microalgae biofilm cultivation. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2017. 114(4): p. 769-776. 14. Mac Dowell, N., et al., The role of CO2 capture and utilization in mitigating climate change. Nature Climate Change, 2017. 7(4): p. 243-249. 15. Margolis, R. and J. Zuboy, Nontechnical barriers to solar energy use: review of recent literature. 2006, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO. 16. Yaqoot, M., P. Diwan, and T.C. Kandpal, Review of barriers to the dissemination of decentralized renewable energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016. 58: p. 477-490. 17. Karatayev, M., et al., Renewable energy technology uptake in Kazakhstan: Policy drivers and barriers in a transitional economy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016. 66: p. 120-136. 18. Kosow, H. and R. Gaßner, Methods of future and scenario analysis: overview, assessment, and selection criteria. 2008. 19. Kunc, M. and F.A. O'Brien, Exploring the development of a methodology for scenario use: Combining scenario and resource mapping approaches. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017. 124(Supplement C): p. 150-159. 20. Okoli, C. and S.D. Pawlowski, The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 2004. 42(1): p. 15-29. 21. Linstone, H.A. and M. Turoff, The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Vol. 29. 1975: Addison-Wesley Reading, MA. 22. Gupta, U.G. and R.E. Clarke, Theory and applications of the Delphi technique: A bibliography (1975–1994). Technological forecasting and social change, 1996. 53(2): p. 185-211. 23. Yousuf, M.I., Using experts’ opinions through Delphi technique. Practical assessment, research & evaluation, 2007. 12(4): p. 1-8. 24. Schmidt, R.C., Managing Delphi surveys using nonparametric statistical techniques. decision Sciences, 1997. 28(3): p. 763-774. 25. Schmidt, R., K. Lyytinen, and P.C. Mark Keil, Identifying software project risks: An international Delphi study. Journal of management information systems, 2001. 17(4): p. 5-36. 26. Schoemaker, P.J., Scenario planning: a tool for strategic thinking. Sloan management review, 1995. 36(2): p. 25. 27. Wulf, T., P. Meissner, and S. Stubner, A scenario-based approach to strategic planning–integrating planning and process perspective of strategy. Leipzig Graduate School of Management, 2010. 28. Patricio, J., et al., Region prioritization for the development of carbon capture and utilization technologies. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 2017. 17: p. 50-59. 29. Keith, D.W., Why capture CO2 from the atmosphere? Science, 2009. 325(5948): p. 1654-1655. 30. Wilson, G., et al., A VISION for Smart CO2 Transformation in Europe (SCOT). Using CO2 As a Resource. 2016, Seventh Framework Programme and European Union. 31. Initiative, T.G.C., A Roadmap for the Global Implementation of Carbon Utilization Technologies: Transforming CO2 from a liability to an asset at significant market scale. 2016. 32. Cuéllar-Franca, R.M. and A. Azapagic, Carbon capture, storage and utilisation technologies: A critical analysis and comparison of their life cycle environmental impacts. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 2015. 9: p. 82-102. 33. Armstrong, K. and P. Styring, Assessing the Potential of Utilization and Storage Strategies for Post-Combustion CO2 Emissions Reduction. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2015. 3(8). 34. Aresta, M., Carbon dioxide recovery and utilization. 2013: Springer Science & Business Media. 35. Quadrelli, E.A., et al., Carbon Dioxide Recycling: Emerging Large-Scale Technologies with Industrial Potential. ChemSusChem, 2011. 4(9): p. 1194-1215. 36. Jones, C.R., et al., What a waste! Assessing public perceptions of Carbon Dioxide Utilisation technology. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 2014. 7: p. 51-54. 37. Rahman, F.A., et al., Pollution to solution: Capture and sequestration of carbon dioxide (CO2) and its utilization as a renewable energy source for a sustainable future. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017. 71: p. 112-126. 38. Styring, P. and D. Jansen, Carbon Capture and Utilisation in the green economy: Using CO2 to manufacture fuel, chemicals and materials. 2011, Centre for Low Carbon Futures. 39. von der Assen, N., J. Jung, and A. Bardow, Life-cycle assessment of carbon dioxide capture and utilization: avoiding the pitfalls. Energy & Environmental Science, 2013. 6(9): p. 2721-2734. 40. von der Assen, N. and A. Bardow, Life cycle assessment of polyols for polyurethane production using CO2 as feedstock: insights from an industrial case study. Green Chemistry, 2014. 16(6): p. 3272-3280. 41. Müller, K., L. Mokrushina, and W. Arlt, Thermodynamic Constraints for the Utilization of CO2. Chemie Ingenieur Technik, 2014. 86(4): p. 497-503. 42. Arakawa, H., et al., Catalysis Research of Relevance to Carbon Management: Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities. Chemical Reviews, 2001. 101(4): p. 953-996. 43. Beckman, E.J., Supercritical and near-critical CO 2 in green chemical synthesis and processing. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 2004. 28(2): p. 121-191. 44. Fraga, E.S. and M. Ng, A framework for the analysis of the security of supply of utilising carbon dioxide as a chemical feedstock. Faraday discussions, 2015. 183: p. 309-326. 45. Song, C., Global challenges and strategies for control, conversion and utilization of CO2 for sustainable development involving energy, catalysis, adsorption and chemical processing. Catalysis Today, 2006. 115(1–4): p. 2-32. 46. Lainez-Aguirre, J.M., M. Pérez-Fortes, and L. Puigjaner, Economic evaluation of bio-based supply chains with CO2 capture and utilisation. Computers & Chemical Engineering. 47. Zhang, X., J.-L. Fan, and Y.-M. Wei, Technology roadmap study on carbon capture, utilization and storage in China. Energy Policy, 2013. 59: p. 536-550. 48. Dimitriou, I., et al., Carbon dioxide utilisation for production of transport fuels: process and economic analysis. Energy & Environmental Science, 2015. 8(6): p. 1775-1789. 49. Li, L., et al., A review of research progress on CO2 capture, storage, and utilization in Chinese Academy of Sciences. Fuel, 2013. 108: p. 112-130. 50. Mikkelsen, M., M. Jørgensen, and F.C. Krebs, The teraton challenge. A review of fixation and transformation of carbon dioxide. Energy & Environmental Science, 2010. 3(1): p. 43-81. 51. Abanades, J.C., et al., On the climate change mitigation potential of CO2 conversion to fuels. Energy & Environmental Science, 2017. 10(12): p. 2491-2499. 52. Society, R. and R.S. Staff, The Potential and Limitations of Using Carbon Dioxide. 2017: Royal Society. 53. Artz, J., et al., Sustainable Conversion of Carbon Dioxide: An Integrated Review of Catalysis and Life Cycle Assessment. Chemical reviews, 2017. 54. von der Gracht, H.A. and I.-L. Darkow, Scenarios for the logistics services industry: A Delphi-based analysis for 2025. International Journal of Production Economics, 2010. 127(1): p. 46-59. 55. Nygrén, N.A., P. Tapio, and Y. Qi, Lake management in 2030—Five future images based on an international Delphi study. Futures, 2017. 93: p. 1-13. 56. Nowack, M., J. Endrikat, and E. Guenther, Review of Delphi-based scenario studies: quality and design considerations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2011. 78(9): p. 1603-1615. 57. Dalkey, N. and O. Helmer, An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management science, 1963. 9(3): p. 458-467. 58. Brancheau, J.C., B.D. Janz, and J.C. Wetherbe, Key issues in information systems management: 1994-95 SIM Delphi results. MIS quarterly, 1996: p. 225-242. 59. Dekleva, S. and J. Zupančič, Key issues in information systems management: a Delphi study in Slovenia. Information & Management, 1996. 31(1): p. 1-11. 60. Kobus, J. and M. Westner. RANKING-TYPE DELPHI STUDIES IN IS RESEARCH: STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE AND ANALYTICAL EXTENSION. in 9th IADIS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE. 61. Pare, G., et al., A systematic assessment of rigor in information systems ranking-type Delphi studies. Information & management, 2013. 50(5): p. 207-217. 62. Rowe, G. and G. Wright, The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. International journal of forecasting, 1999. 15(4): p. 353-375. 63. Hasson, F. and S. Keeney, Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2011. 78(9): p. 1695-1704. 64. Mullen, P.M., Delphi: myths and reality. Journal of health organization and management, 2003. 17(1): p. 37-52. 65. Hall, J.K. and M.J. Martin, Disruptive technologies, stakeholders and the innovation value‐added chain: a framework for evaluating radical technology development. R&D Management, 2005. 35(3): p. 273-284. 66. Goodman, L.A., Snowball sampling. The annals of mathematical statistics, 1961: p. 148-170. 67. Gilbart, E. and N. Kreiger, Improvement in cumulative response rates following implementation of a financial incentive. American journal of epidemiology, 1998. 148(1): p. 97-99. 68. Keil, M., A. Tiwana, and A. Bush, Reconciling user and project manager perceptions of IT project risk: a Delphi study1. Information Systems Journal, 2002. 12(2): p. 103-119. 69. Powell, C., The Delphi technique: myths and realities. Journal of advanced nursing, 2003. 41(4): p. 376-382. 70. Corbin, J. and A. Strauss, Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 1990. 19(6): p. 418-427. 71. Alwin, D.F. and J.A. Krosnick, The measurement of values in surveys: A comparison of ratings and rankings. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1985. 49(4): p. 535-552. 72. Kendall, M.G. and B.B. Smith, The Problem of m Rankings. 1939: p. 275-287. 73. von der Gracht, H.A., Consensus measurement in Delphi studies: Review and implications for future quality assurance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2012. 79(8): p. 1525-1536. 74. UNEP, Global Environment Outlook 3. 2002. p. 320. 75. Bishop, P., A. Hines, and T. Collins, The current state of scenario development: an overview of techniques. foresight, 2007. 9(1): p. 5-25. 76. Mahmoud, M., et al., A formal framework for scenario development in support of environmental decision-making. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2009. 24(7): p. 798-808. 77. Van der Heijden, K., Scenarios: the art of strategic conversation. 2011: John Wiley & Sons. 78. Amer, M., T.U. Daim, and A. Jetter, A review of scenario planning. Futures, 2013. 46: p. 23-40. 79. Börjeson, L., et al., Scenario types and techniques: Towards a user's guide. Futures, 2006. 38(7): p. 723-739. 80. Van Notten, P.W., et al., An updated scenario typology. Futures, 2003. 35(5): p. 423-443. 81. Siebelink, R., J.I. Halman, and E. Hofman, Scenario-Driven Roadmapping to cope with uncertainty: Its application in the construction industry. Technological forecasting and social change, 2016. 110: p. 226-238. 82. van 't Klooster, S.A. and M.B.A. van Asselt, Practising the scenario-axes technique. Futures, 2006. 38(1): p. 15-30. 83. Publications, N., Picture This - A Guide to Scenario Planning for Voluntary: Organisations. 2006: NCVO Publications. 84. Mac Dowell, N., et al., The role of CO2 capture and utilization in mitigating climate change. Nature Clim. Change, 2017. 7(4): p. 243-249. 85. van Heek, J., K. Arning, and M. Ziefle, Reduce, reuse, recycle: Acceptance of CO2-utilization for plastic products. Energy Policy, 2017. 105: p. 53-66. 86. Schrag, D.P., Storage of carbon dioxide in offshore sediments. Science, 2009. 325(5948): p. 1658-1659. 87. Goeppert, A., et al., Recycling of carbon dioxide to methanol and derived products–closing the loop. Chemical Society Reviews, 2014. 43(23): p. 7995-8048. 88. Thomassen, G., et al., A review of the sustainability of algal-based biorefineries: Towards an integrated assessment framework. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017. 68: p. 876-887. 89. Carlsson Reich, M., Economic assessment of municipal waste management systems—case studies using a combination of life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC). Journal of Cleaner Production, 2005. 13(3): p. 253-263. 90. Negro, S.O., R.A.A. Suurs, and M.P. Hekkert, The bumpy road of biomass gasification in the Netherlands: Explaining the rise and fall of an emerging innovation system. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2008. 75(1): p. 57-77. 91. O'Brien, F.A. and M. Meadows, Scenario orientation and use to support strategy development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2013. 80(4): p. 643-656.; International Conference on Resource Sustainability (icRS 2018), Beijing, China, 27-29/06/2018; http://hdl.handle.net/1942/26724Test
الإتاحة: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/26724Test
-
85كتاب
المؤلفون: Matzcak, M, Meyer, N, Ooms, E, Schröder, L, Vološina, M, Warmelink, HJG, Zaucha, J, Czermańsk, E, Coornaert, C, Koch, A
المصدر: Matzcak , M , Meyer , N , Ooms , E , Schröder , L , Vološina , M , Warmelink , HJG , Zaucha , J , Czermańsk , E , Coornaert , C & Koch , A 2018 , QUO VADIS: Exploring the future of shipping in the Baltic Sea. < https://vasab.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/20180730_FutureShippingQuoVadis.pdfTest >
مصطلحات موضوعية: marine spatial planning, maritime spatial planning, simulation gaming, serious gaming, planning support systems, scenario development, baltic sea region
-
86دورية أكاديمية
المؤلفون: Mitić Vlada M., Dimić Srđan H., Kankaraš Milan S.
المصدر: Војно дело, Vol 69, Iss 4, Pp 17-35 (2017)
مصطلحات موضوعية: scenario development methods, morphological analysis, decision-making, classification, clustering, k-means, decision tree, Military Science
وصف الملف: electronic resource
العلاقة: https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0042-8426/2017/0042-84261704017M.pdfTest; https://doaj.org/toc/0042-8426Test; https://doaj.org/toc/2683-5703Test
-
87دورية أكاديمية
المؤلفون: Alshehhi, Bashayer, Khelalfa, Halim, Yusof, Shafiz A.Mohd
المصدر: Scopus Harvesting Series
مصطلحات موضوعية: anomaly detection, Insider threats, scenario development, security, user behavior analysis
العلاقة: https://ro.uow.edu.au/test2021/11578Test; https://doi.org/10.1109/ACIT58888.2023.10453889Test
الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACIT58888.2023.10453889Test
https://ro.uow.edu.au/test2021/11578Test -
88دورية أكاديمية
المؤلفون: Islam, Samsul, Goerlandt, Floris, Sakalayen, Quazi Mohammed Habibus, Shi, Yangyan, Venkatesh, V. G.
المصدر: Islam , S , Goerlandt , F , Sakalayen , Q M H , Shi , Y & Venkatesh , V G 2023 , ' Developing a "Disaster Scenario" to prepare for the possibility of disruptions to maritime transportation serving coastal communities of Vancouver Island ' , Marine Policy , vol. 150 , 105531 , pp. 1-19 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105531Test
مصطلحات موضوعية: Disaster scenario, Humanitarian logistics, Maritime risk and safety, Coastal community, Supply chain disruption, Maritime transportation, Emergency management, Vulnerability assessment, Resilience planning, Transport disruption, Maritime logistics, Canada, Vancouver Island, Climate change, Risk assessment, Fraser River, Scenario development
الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105531Test
https://researchers.mq.edu.au/en/publications/86cd9e0a-a6f5-4959-98a2-a5eb62887d3aTest
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85150865890&partnerID=8YFLogxKTest -
89دورية أكاديمية
المؤلفون: Giulia Dondè, Jacques Trienekens, Jacqueline M. Bloemhof
المصدر: International Journal on Food System Dynamics, Vol 7, Iss 4, Pp 271-292 (2016)
مصطلحات موضوعية: sustainability, beef, pork supply chain, supply chain management, Brazil, scenario development, Nutrition. Foods and food supply, TX341-641
وصف الملف: electronic resource
العلاقة: http://centmapress.ilb.uni-bonn.de/ojs/index.php/fsd/article/view/595Test; https://doaj.org/toc/1869-6945Test
-
90دورية أكاديمية
المصدر: European Cooperation, Vol 8, Iss 15, Pp 108-119 (2016)
مصطلحات موضوعية: regions, modernization, infrastructure indicators, integral index, strategic benchmark, scenario development, Economics as a science, HB71-74
وصف الملف: electronic resource