-
1دورية أكاديمية
المؤلفون: Cheema, Haadiya, Brophy, Robert, Collins, Jamie, Cox, Charles L., Guermazi, Ali, Kumara, Mahima, Levy, Bruce A., MacFarlane, Lindsey, Mandl, Lisa A., Marx, Robert, Selzer, Faith, Spindler, Kurt, Katz, Jeffrey N., Murray, Eleanor J.
المساهمون: National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
المصدر: Osteoarthritis and Cartilage ; volume 32, issue 3, page 319-328 ; ISSN 1063-4584
مصطلحات موضوعية: Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Rheumatology
الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2023.10.007Test
https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1063458423009597?httpAccept=text/xmlTest
https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1063458423009597?httpAccept=text/plainTest -
2
المؤلفون: Murray, Eleanor J., Cheema, Haadiya
الوصف: Background: Methodological advances can be slow to spread within scientific communities. A number of barriers have been hypothesized, including lack of technical competency, bias towards existing methods, and relative degree of improvement attributable to a novel method. Although the relative contribution of these has been modeled, few empirical examples exist.Objective: We present a case study of attitudes towards adjustment for predictors of non-adherence in randomized clinical trials. We track attitudes by assessing the trajectory of citations of a highly influential 1980 anti-adjustment publication from the Coronary Drug Project (CDP) over time.Methods: We obtained copies of all publications citing that 1980 CDP paper. Articles were reviewed to determine why the authors cited the paper, and categorized by theme. Results: Despite recent methodological developments and re-analyses showing that the results are no longer true using modern statistical best practices, the 1980 CDP paper continues to be highly cited. Citations primarily rely on the paper as evidence against adherence adjustment, with little change in practices over time. Conclusion: Despite well-documented improvement using novel analytic methods, bias towards existing methods—in the form of a single highly influential publication—can have long lasting consequences on the uptake of new methods.
-
3
المؤلفون: Caunca, Michelle R, Cheema, Haadiya, Weuve, Jennifer, Murray, Eleanor J., Corps, Epidemiology COVID- Response
الوصف: This is a public comment on behalf of a group of epidemiologists, public health students, and public health practitioners for submission to the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Committee for A Framework for Equitable Allocation of Vaccine for the Novel Coronavirus. We believe that Equitable Vaccine Distribution is of the utmost importance as the next major step in COVID-19 response. The pandemic has disproportionately affected BIPOC populations by almost every measure--risk of infection, death, and economic toll--due to the structural racism and racial capitalism that underlies all major systems of American culture, including healthcare, public health response, resource allocation, and science communication.
