دورية أكاديمية

A validation study comparing two self-reported upper extremity symptom surveys with clinical examinations for upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: A validation study comparing two self-reported upper extremity symptom surveys with clinical examinations for upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders.
المؤلفون: Menéndez, Cammie Chaumont, Amick Iii, Benjamin C., Jenkins, Mark, Caroom, Cyrus, Robertson, Michelle, Gerr, Fred, Moore, J. Steven, Harrist, Ronald B., Katz, Jeffrey N.
المصدر: Work; 2012, Vol. 43 Issue 3, p293-302, 10p, 1 Diagram, 7 Charts
مصطلحات موضوعية: DIAGNOSIS of muscle diseases, ARM, CONFIDENCE intervals, STATISTICAL correlation, EPIDEMIOLOGY, GRADUATE students, WORK-related injuries, MUSCLE diseases, PHYSICAL diagnosis, QUESTIONNAIRES, SCALE analysis (Psychology), SELF-evaluation, STATISTICS, DATA analysis, VISUAL analog scale, CROSS-sectional method, SEVERITY of illness index, RESEARCH methodology evaluation, DATA analysis software, DESCRIPTIVE statistics
مصطلحات جغرافية: WEST Virginia
مستخلص: Objective: Evaluate the validity of two self-report symptoms surveys with two disorder classification protocols. Participants: 100 graduate students at a private school in the Southwest United States. Methods: Study participants completed two self-report upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms surveys: a nine item 10 cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and a nine item Likert categorical scale anchored from "None" to "Very severe". Clinical examinations were administered using two musculoskeletal disorder classification protocols. Results: For the nine body regions, concordance between the two self-report symptoms scales ranged from 0.49-0.75. Overall there was greater than 80% agreement for the two disorder classification protocols. Using either symptom survey with either disorder classification protocol provided high sensitivities and specificities (Youden's J ⩾ 0.70). Three of possible six symptom survey/classification protocol pairings provided high sensitivities and specificities across all disorder groups. Conclusion: In this graduate student sample, none of the self-report symptom survey-classification protocol pairings was demonstratively more useful than any other pairing for studies of musculoskeletal disorders among computer users. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Work is the property of IOS Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:10519815
DOI:10.3233/wor-2012-1401