دورية أكاديمية

The European Court of Justice Ruling in Brüstle v. Greenpeace: The Impacts on Patenting of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells in Europe.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: The European Court of Justice Ruling in Brüstle v. Greenpeace: The Impacts on Patenting of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells in Europe.
المؤلفون: Vrtovec, Katja Triller, Scoff, Christopher Thomas
المصدر: Cell Stem Cell; 12/2/2011, Vol. 9 Issue 6, p502-503, 2p
مصطلحات موضوعية: PATENTS, PLURIPOTENT stem cells, HUMAN embryos, HUMAN embryonic stem cells, LABORATORY mice, DIGNITY
مصطلحات جغرافية: EUROPE
الشركة/الكيان: COURT of Justice of the European Union
مستخلص: The article focuses on the impacts on patenting of human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) in Europe by the Court of the European Union (CJEU) ruling of the court case of Brüstle v. Greespeace. It says that CJEU defined the concept of human embryos explicitly mentions the use of human ova. It states that transplanting iPSCs and human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) into mouse embryos can also produce live chimeric animals. Meanwhile, Europe focuses more protecting human dignity.
قاعدة البيانات: Supplemental Index
الوصف
تدمد:19345909
DOI:10.1016/j.stem.2011.11.009