دورية أكاديمية

Patients with an Open Abdomen in Asian, American and European Continents: A Comparative Analysis from the International Register of Open Abdomen (IROA).

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Patients with an Open Abdomen in Asian, American and European Continents: A Comparative Analysis from the International Register of Open Abdomen (IROA).
المؤلفون: Sibilla, Maria Grazia, Cremonini, Camilla, Portinari, Mattia, Carcoforo, Paolo, Tartaglia, Dario, Cicuttin, Enrico, Musetti, Serena, Strambi, Silvia, Sartelli, Massimo, Radica, Margherita Koleva, Catena, Fausto, Chiarugi, Massimo, Coccolini, Federico, IROA Study Group, Montori, Giulia, Salvetti, Fracensco, Negoi, Ionut, Zese, Monica, Occhionorelli, Savino, Shlyapnikov, Sergei
المصدر: World Journal of Surgery; Jan2023, Vol. 47 Issue 1, p142-151, 10p
مصطلحات موضوعية: CONTINENTS, ABDOMEN, INTENSIVE care units, COMPARATIVE studies, INTRA-abdominal hypertension
مصطلحات جغرافية: AMERICA, ASIA
مستخلص: Background: International register of open abdomen (IROA) enrolls patients from several centers in American, European, and Asiatic continent. The aim of our study is to compare the characteristics, management and clinical outcome of adult patients treated with OA in the three continents. Material and methods: A prospective analysis of adult patients enrolled in the international register of open abdomen (IROA). Trial registration: NCT02382770. Results: 1183 patients were enrolled from American, European and Asiatic Continent. Median age was 63 years (IQR 49–74) and was higher in the European continent (65 years, p < 0.001); 57% were male. The main indication for OA was peritonitis (50.6%) followed by trauma (15.4%) and vascular emergency (13.5%) with differences among the continents (p < 0.001). Commercial NPWT was preferred in America and Europe (77.4% and 52.3% of cases) while Barker vacuum pack (48.2%) was the preferred temporary abdominal closure technique in Asia (p < 0.001). Definitive abdominal closure was achieved in 82.3% of cases in America (fascial closure in 90.2% of cases) and in 56.4% of cases in Asia (p < 0.001). Prosthesis were mostly used in Europe (17.3%, p < 0.001). The overall entero-atmospheric fistula rate 2.5%. Median open abdomen duration was 4 days (IQR 2–7). The overall intensive care unit and hospital length-of-stay were, respectively, 8 and 11 days (no differences between continents). The overall morbidity and mortality rates for America, Europe, and Asia were, respectively, 75.8%, 75.3%, 91.8% (p = 0.001) and 31.9%, 51.6%, 56.9% (p < 0.001). Conclusion: There is no uniformity in OA management in the different continents. Heterogeneous adherence to international guidelines application is evident. Different temporary abdominal closure techniques in relation to indications led to different outcomes across the continents. Adherence to guidelines, combined with more consistent data, will ultimately allow to improving knowledge and outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of World Journal of Surgery is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:03642313
DOI:10.1007/s00268-022-06733-4