دورية أكاديمية

The evidence for cognitive behavioural therapy in any condition, population or context: a meta-review of systematic reviews and panoramic meta-analysis.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: The evidence for cognitive behavioural therapy in any condition, population or context: a meta-review of systematic reviews and panoramic meta-analysis.
المؤلفون: Fordham, Beth, Sugavanam, Thavapriya, Edwards, Katherine, Stallard, Paul, Howard, Robert, das Nair, Roshan, Copsey, Bethan, Lee, Hopin, Howick, Jeremy, Hemming, Karla, Lamb, Sarah E.
المصدر: Psychological Medicine; Jan2021, Vol. 51 Issue 1, p21-29, 9p
مصطلحات موضوعية: CINAHL database, COGNITIVE therapy, CONFIDENCE intervals, HEALTH status indicators, MEDICAL databases, INFORMATION storage & retrieval systems, MEDICAL information storage & retrieval systems, MEDLINE, META-analysis, NOSOLOGY, PSYCHIATRY, QUALITY of life, SYSTEMATIC reviews, EVIDENCE-based medicine, DEMOGRAPHIC characteristics, TREATMENT effectiveness, DESCRIPTIVE statistics, EVALUATION
مصطلحات جغرافية: AFRICA, ASIA, SOUTH America
الشركة/الكيان: WORLD Health Organization
مستخلص: The majority of psychological treatment research is dedicated to investigating the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) across different conditions, population and contexts. We aimed to summarise the current systematic review evidence and evaluate the consistency of CBT's effect across different conditions. We included reviews of CBT randomised controlled trials in any: population, condition, format, context, with any type of comparator and published in English. We searched DARE, Cochrane, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, CDAS, and OpenGrey between 1992 and January 2019. Reviews were quality assessed, their data extracted and summarised. The effects upon health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were pooled, within-condition groups. If the across-condition heterogeneity was I2 < 75%, we pooled effects using a random-effect panoramic meta-analysis. We summarised 494 reviews (221 128 participants), representing 14/20 physical and 13/20 mental conditions (World Health Organisation's International Classification of Diseases). Most reviews were lower-quality (351/494), investigated face-to-face CBT (397/494), and in adults (378/494). Few reviews included trials conducted in Asia, South America or Africa (45/494). CBT produced a modest benefit across-conditions on HRQoL (standardised mean difference 0.23; 95% confidence intervals 0.14–0.33, I2 = 32%). The effect's associated prediction interval −0.05 to 0.50 suggested CBT will remain effective in conditions for which we do not currently have available evidence. While there remain some gaps in the completeness of the evidence base, we need to recognise the consistent evidence for the general benefit which CBT offers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Psychological Medicine is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:00332917
DOI:10.1017/S0033291720005292