التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Therapeutic Devices for Motor Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease: Current Progress and a Systematic Review of Recent Randomized Controlled Trials. |
| المؤلفون: |
Fujikawa, Joji, Morigaki, Ryoma, Yamamoto, Nobuaki, Oda, Teruo, Nakanishi, Hiroshi, Izumi, Yuishin, Takagi, Yasushi |
| المصدر: |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience; 3/29/2022, Vol. 14, p1-25, 25p |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
PARKINSON'S disease treatment, ONLINE information services, SPINAL cord, EQUIPMENT & supplies, NEUROLOGICAL disorders, PHOTOBIOMODULATION therapy, SYSTEMATIC reviews, VAGUS nerve, TREMOR, GAIT disorders, PARKINSON'S disease, ELECTRIC stimulation, MEDLINE, MOTOR ability, NEURAL stimulation, SYMPTOMS |
| مستخلص: |
Background: Pharmacotherapy is the first-line treatment option for Parkinson's disease, and levodopa is considered the most effective drug for managing motor symptoms. However, side effects such as motor fluctuation and dyskinesia have been associated with levodopa treatment. For these conditions, alternative therapies, including invasive and non-invasive medical devices, may be helpful. This review sheds light on current progress in the development of devices to alleviate motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease. Methods: We first conducted a narrative literature review to obtain an overview of current invasive and non-invasive medical devices and thereafter performed a systematic review of recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of these devices. Results: Our review revealed different characteristics of each device and their effectiveness for motor symptoms. Although invasive medical devices are usually highly effective, surgical procedures can be burdensome for patients and have serious side effects. In contrast, non-pharmacological/non-surgical devices have fewer complications. RCTs of non-invasive devices, especially non-invasive brain stimulation and mechanical peripheral stimulation devices, have proven effectiveness on motor symptoms. Nearly no non-invasive devices have yet received Food and Drug Administration certification or a CE mark. Conclusion: Invasive and non-invasive medical devices have unique characteristics, and several RCTs have been conducted for each device. Invasive devices are more effective, while non-invasive devices are less effective and have lower hurdles and risks. It is important to understand the characteristics of each device and capitalize on these. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience is the property of Frontiers Media S.A. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |
Full Text Finder