دورية أكاديمية

Effectiveness of ocriplasmin in real‐world settings: A systematic literature review, meta‐analysis, and comparison with randomized trials.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Effectiveness of ocriplasmin in real‐world settings: A systematic literature review, meta‐analysis, and comparison with randomized trials.
المؤلفون: Khanani, Arshad M., Constantine, Ryan N., Blot, Koenraad H., Lescrauwaet, Benedicte, Szurman, Peter
المصدر: Acta Ophthalmologica (1755375X); Sep2021, Vol. 99 Issue 6, pe823-e836, 14p
مصطلحات موضوعية: MALIGNANT hyperthermia, PATIENT selection, RANDOMIZED controlled trials, ODDS ratio
مستخلص: Purpose: Effectiveness of ocriplasmin for vitreomacular traction (VMT) varies depending on the presence of common ocular conditions and patient selection criteria. We carried out a systematic literature review and meta‐analysis of ocriplasmin studies conducted in real‐world settings (RWS) and compared outcomes with those from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: We included prospective and retrospective studies from RWS documenting effectiveness of ocriplasmin in patients with VMT with or without MH, and RCTs of ocriplasmin versus control. Key end‐points were vitreomacular adhesion resolution (VMAR), nonsurgical MH closure, need for vitrectomy and safety. We conducted meta‐regression on pooled results to evaluate effects of baseline covariates and study design on outcomes. Results: Thirty RWS (2402 patients) and 5 RCTs (737 patients) were included epiretinal membrane (ERM) and broad VMA were more prevalent in RCTs. Primary VMAR, vitrectomy and MH closure rates were comparable between RWS and RCTs. Rates of nsVMAR were significantly higher in RWS than RCTs (odds ratio 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.18–2.34). nsVMAR rates were inversely associated with ERM prevalence (odds ratio 0.20; 95% CI: 0.08–0.51). Compared with the recent OASIS trial, RWS reported a higher incidence of new/worsening subretinal fluid cases and less photophobia, photopsia, vitreous floaters, electroretinogram abnormalities and MH progression. Conclusions: Ocriplasmin was significantly more effective in achieving nsVMAR in RWS than in RCTs. Lower ERM prevalence in RWS was the single significant explanatory variable for this difference. Conclusions on ocriplasmin safety in RWS are limited due to inconsistent reporting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Acta Ophthalmologica (1755375X) is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:1755375X
DOI:10.1111/aos.14686