التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Unprofessional behaviour of GP residents leading to a dismissal dispute: characteristics and outcomes of those who appeal. |
| المؤلفون: |
Godschalx-Dekker, Judith A., Sijbom, Charlotte A. M., Barnhoorn, Pieter C., van Mook, Walther N. K. A. |
| المصدر: |
BMC Primary Care; 2/20/2024, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p1-9, 9p |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
CORRUPTION, PATIENT aftercare, HOSPITAL medical staff, PROFESSIONS, OFFENSIVE behavior, FAMILY medicine, SELF-perception, ORGANIZATIONAL behavior, QUANTITATIVE research, RETROSPECTIVE studies, INTERNSHIP programs, QUALITATIVE research, SELF-consciousness (Awareness), CLINICAL competence, COMMUNICATION, DESCRIPTIVE statistics, LABOR discipline, LEGAL procedure, JOB performance, PROFESSIONALISM, DATA analysis software, PATIENT safety, DECEPTION, REFLECTION (Philosophy) |
| مصطلحات جغرافية: |
NETHERLANDS |
| مستخلص: |
Background: Recognition of poor performance in General Practice trainees is important because underperformance compromises patients' health and safety. However, in General Practice, research on persistent underperformance while in training and its ultimate consequences is almost completely lacking. We aim to explore the unprofessional behaviours of residents in General Practice who were dismissed from training and who litigated against dismissal. Methods: We performed a structured analysis using open-source data from all General Practice cases before the Conciliation Board of the Royal Dutch Medical Association between 2011 and 2020. Anonymised law cases about residents from all Dutch GP training programmes were analysed in terms of the quantitative and qualitative aspects related to performance. Results: Between 2011 and 2020, 24 residents who were dismissed from training challenged their programme director's decision. Dismissed residents performed poorly in several competencies, including communication, medical expertise and most prominently, professionalism. Over 90% of dismissed residents failed on professionalism. Most lacked self-awareness and/or failed to profit from feedback. Approximately 80% failed on communication, and about 60% on medical expertise as well. A large majority (more than 80%) of dismissed residents had previously participated in some form of remediation. Conclusions: Deficiencies in both professionalism and communication were the most prevalent findings among the dismissed General Practice residents. These two deficiencies overlapped considerably. Dismissed residents who challenged their programme director's decision were considered to lack self-awareness, which requires introspection and the appreciation of feedback from others. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of BMC Primary Care is the property of BioMed Central and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |
Full Text Finder