التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Comparison of gut microbiome composition in colonic biopsies, endoscopically-collected and at-home-collected stool samples |
| المؤلفون: |
Nowicki, Christina, Ray, Lucille, Engen, Philip, Madrigrano, Andrea, Witt, Thomas, Lad, Thomas, Cobleigh, Melody, Mutlu, Ece A. |
| المصدر: |
Frontiers in Microbiology ; volume 14 ; ISSN 1664-302X |
| بيانات النشر: |
Frontiers Media SA |
| سنة النشر: |
2023 |
| المجموعة: |
Frontiers (Publisher - via CrossRef) |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
Microbiology (medical), Microbiology |
| الوصف: |
Aim The goal of this study is to compare microbiome composition in three different sample types in women, namely stool brought from home vs. solid stool samples obtained at the time of an unprepped sigmoidoscopy vs. biopsies of the colonic mucosa at the time of an unprepped sigmoidoscopy, using alpha- and beta-diversity metrics following bacterial 16S rRNA sequencing. The findings may have relevance to health and disease states in which bacterial metabolism has a significant impact on molecules/metabolites that are recirculated between the gut lumen and mucosa and systemic circulation, such as estrogens (as in breast cancer) or bile acids. Methods Concomitant at-home-collected stool, endoscopically-collected stool, and colonic biopsy samples were collected from 48 subjects (24 breast cancer, 24 control.) After 16S rRNA sequencing, an amplicon sequence variant (ASV) based approach was used to analyze the data. Alpha diversity metrics (Chao1, Pielou’s Evenness, Faith PD, Shannon, and Simpson) and beta diversity metrics (Bray-Curtis, Weighted and Unweighted Unifrac) were calculated. LEfSe was used to analyze differences in the abundance of various taxa between sample types. Results Alpha and beta diversity metrics were significantly different between the three sample types. Biopsy samples were different than stool samples in all metrics. The highest variation in microbiome diversity was noted in the colonic biopsy samples. At-home and endoscopically-collected stool showed more similarities in count-based and weighted beta diversity metrics. There were significant differences in rare taxa and phylogenetically-diverse taxa between the two types of stool samples. Generally, there were higher levels of Proteobacteria in biopsy samples, with significantly more Actinobacteria and Firmicutes in stool (all p < 0.001, q-value < 0.05). Overall, there was a significantly higher relative abundance of Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae in stool samples (at-home collected and endoscopically-collected) and higher ... |
| نوع الوثيقة: |
article in journal/newspaper |
| اللغة: |
unknown |
| DOI: |
10.3389/fmicb.2023.1148097 |
| DOI: |
10.3389/fmicb.2023.1148097/full |
| الإتاحة: |
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1148097Test |
| حقوق: |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0Test/ |
| رقم الانضمام: |
edsbas.CE645F75 |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
BASE |
