-
1دورية أكاديمية
المساهمون: Centre de Recherches et d'Etudes Interdisciplinaires sur le Développement Durable (CREIDD), Institut Charles Delaunay (ICD), Université de Technologie de Troyes (UTT)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Technologie de Troyes (UTT)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte Natal (UFRN), Institut de Mécanique et d'Ingénierie de Bordeaux (I2M), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Université de Bordeaux (UB)-École Nationale Supérieure d'Arts et Métiers (ENSAM), Arts et Métiers Sciences et Technologies, HESAM Université - Communauté d'universités et d'établissements Hautes écoles Sorbonne Arts et métiers université (HESAM)-HESAM Université - Communauté d'universités et d'établissements Hautes écoles Sorbonne Arts et métiers université (HESAM)-Arts et Métiers Sciences et Technologies, HESAM Université - Communauté d'universités et d'établissements Hautes écoles Sorbonne Arts et métiers université (HESAM)-HESAM Université - Communauté d'universités et d'établissements Hautes écoles Sorbonne Arts et métiers université (HESAM)-Institut Polytechnique de Bordeaux-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), APESA Pau
المصدر: ISSN: 0890-0604.
مصطلحات موضوعية: Life cycle assessment, knowledge, learning, choice of LCIA indicators and methods, eco- design tools, [SPI]Engineering Sciences [physics]
الوصف: International audience ; Despite alefforts for a sustainable production system, many companies are still struggling to implement environmental aspects in their daily product development processes. Among the evaluation and improvement methods, life cycle assessment (LCA) is one of the most popular tools to achieve this goal. Up to date, LCA has been applied to many products, services, and industrial systems to evaluate their environmental impact aspects. However, there is a wide range of indicators available to be applied for LCA, and choosing an inappropriate indicator may lead the product designer to achieve wrong and weak results. Therefore, this paper proposes to overcome this difficulty by developing a method that can be used as a knowledge transfer to product designers and LCA practitioners in order to help them to make the most appropriate choice of LCA indicators. This method should have some characteristics, such as (a) to be adaptable to a given context and (b) to be dynamic, scalable, and easy to learn. The purpose of this paper is to present the Evaluation Method for Choosing Indicator (EMCI) developed to facilitate the learning process of LCA methods and to quickly select their most appropriate indicators. To validate the EMCI method, a case study on a French textile industry has been implemented. The focus was to evaluate how LCA indicatorsand methods were chosen to be integrated into the suitable eco-design LCA tool.
العلاقة: hal-02318734; https://hal.science/hal-02318734Test; https://hal.science/hal-02318734/documentTest; https://hal.science/hal-02318734/file/I2M_AIED_2019_LARATTETest
-
2دورية أكاديمية
المؤلفون: Reyes, Tatiana1 (AUTHOR), Gouvinhas, Reidson Pereira2 (AUTHOR), Laratte, Bertrand3,4 (AUTHOR) bertrand.laratte@ensam.eu, Chevalier, Bruno1 (AUTHOR)
المصدر: AI EDAM. Feb2020, Vol. 34 Issue 1, p68-79. 12p.
مصطلحات موضوعية: *ENVIRONMENTAL indicators, *CASE studies, *EVALUATION methodology, *KNOWLEDGE transfer, *TEXTILE technology
مستخلص: Despite alefforts for a sustainable production system, many companies are still struggling to implement environmental aspects in their daily product development processes. Among the evaluation and improvement methods, life cycle assessment (LCA) is one of the most popular tools to achieve this goal. Up to date, LCA has been applied to many products, services, and industrial systems to evaluate their environmental impact aspects. However, there is a wide range of indicators available to be applied for LCA, and choosing an inappropriate indicator may lead the product designer to achieve wrong and weak results. Therefore, this paper proposes to overcome this difficulty by developing a method that can be used as a knowledge transfer to product designers and LCA practitioners in order to help them to make the most appropriate choice of LCA indicators. This method should have some characteristics, such as (a) to be adaptable to a given context and (b) to be dynamic, scalable, and easy to learn. The purpose of this paper is to present the Evaluation Method for Choosing Indicator (EMCI) developed to facilitate the learning process of LCA methods and to quickly select their most appropriate indicators. To validate the EMCI method, a case study on a French textile industry has been implemented. The focus was to evaluate how LCA indicators and methods were chosen to be integrated into the suitable eco-design LCA tool. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
-
3دورية أكاديمية
المؤلفون: Reyes, Tatiana, Millet, Dominique
المساهمون: Centre de Recherches et d'Etudes Interdisciplinaires sur le Développement Durable (CREIDD), Institut Charles Delaunay (ICD), Université de Technologie de Troyes (UTT)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Technologie de Troyes (UTT)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Laboratoire d'Ingénierie des Systèmes Mécaniques et des MAtériaux (LISMMA), Université Paris 8 Vincennes-Saint-Denis (UP8)-SUPMECA - Institut supérieur de mécanique de Paris (SUPMECA), Laboratoire Conception de Systèmes Mécaniques et Robotiques - EA 7398 (COSMER), Université de Toulon (UTLN)
المصدر: ISSN: 1476-8917.
مصطلحات موضوعية: ecodesign, integration, learning, Trojan horse, strategy, industrial ecology, design process, ecodesign tool, green product, sustainable product development, [SPI.MECA.GEME]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Mechanics [physics.med-ph]/Mechanical engineering [physics.class-ph]
الوصف: International audience ; This paper aims to propose a new solution based on the progressive evolution of the environmental performance of the organisation considered by way of the design, deployment and enrichment of a ‘classic’ ecodesign tool. This is developed by a multi-functional team and acts as a learning vector within the company. This approach is called ‘the environmental Trojan horse strategy’ (ETHS) because the underlying strategy is to introduce an appropriate pretext that enables collaborative work (the ecodesign tool has to be co-designed) and to supply the organisation with the necessary skills to develop it further. This enables it to take into account many more environmental criteria and to integrate them better in the PDP. Applying the ETHS allows a company to progress along an integration trajectory from a partial ecodesign approach towards an eco-innovation approach. The proposed ETHS has been tested in a French SME for five years.
العلاقة: hal-01723877; https://univ-tln.hal.science/hal-01723877Test
