دورية أكاديمية

CD10, BCL6, and MUM1 expression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma on FNA samples

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: CD10, BCL6, and MUM1 expression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma on FNA samples
المؤلفون: Immacolata, Cozzolino, Valeria, Varone, PICARDI, MARCO, Carlo, Baldi, Domenico, Memoli, Giuseppe, Ciancia, Carmine, Selleri, DE ROSA, GAETANO, VETRANI, ANTONIO, Pio, Zeppa
المساهمون: Immacolata, Cozzolino, Valeria, Varone, Picardi, Marco, Carlo, Baldi, Domenico, Memoli, Giuseppe, Ciancia, Carmine, Selleri, DE ROSA, Gaetano, Vetrani, Antonio, Pio, Zeppa
سنة النشر: 2016
المجموعة: IRIS Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
مصطلحات موضوعية: B-cell lymphoma 6 (BCL6), CD10, cell block, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), fine-needle aspiration (FNA), multiple myeloma oncogene 1 (MUM1), non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Biopsy, Fine-Needle, Cohort Studie, DNA-Binding Protein, Female, Gene Expression Profiling, Human, Immunohistochemistry, Interferon Regulatory Factor, Linear Model, Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse, Male, Middle Aged, Neprilysin, Prognosi, Prospective Studie, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
الوصف: BACKGROUND: Gene expression profiling has divided diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) into 2 main subgroups: germinal center B (GCB) and non-GCB type. This classification is reproducible by immunohistochemistry using specific antibodies such as CD10, B-cell lymphoma 6 (BCL6), and multiple myeloma oncogene 1 (MUM1). Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) plays an important role in the diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and in some cases FNA may be the only available pathological specimen. The objectives of the current study were to evaluate CD10, BCL6, and MUM1 immunostaining on FNA samples by testing the CD10, BCL6, and MUM1 algorithm on both FNA cell blocks (CB) and conventional smears (CS), evaluating differences in CB and CS immunocytochemical (ICC) performance, and comparing results with histological data. METHODS: Thirty-eight consecutive DLBCL cases diagnosed by FNA were studied. Additional passes were used to prepare CB in 22 cases and CS in 16 cases; the corresponding sections and smears were immunostained using CD10, BCL6, and MUM1 in all cases. The data obtained were compared with histological immunostaining in 24 cases. RESULTS: ICC was successful in 33 cases (18 CB and 15 CS) and not evaluable in 5 cases (4 CB and 1 CS). The CD10-BCL6-MUM1 algorithm subclassified DLBCL as GCB (9 cases) and non-GCB (24 cases). ICC data were confirmed on histologic staining in 24 cases. CONCLUSIONS: CD10, BCL6, and MUM1 ICC staining can be performed on FNA samples. The results herein prove it is reliable both on CB and CS, and is equally effective and comparable to immunohistochemistry data.
نوع الوثيقة: article in journal/newspaper
اللغة: English
العلاقة: info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:000370737500008; volume:124; issue:2; firstpage:135; lastpage:143; numberofpages:9; journal:CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY; http://hdl.handle.net/11588/642122Test; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/scopus/2-s2.0-84958818313; http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002Test/(ISSN)1934-6638
DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21626
DOI: 10.1002/(ISSN)1934-6638
الإتاحة: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.21626Test
http://hdl.handle.net/11588/642122Test
حقوق: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
رقم الانضمام: edsbas.5CA28A5F
قاعدة البيانات: BASE