دورية أكاديمية

Single port/incision laparoscopic surgery compared with standard three-port laparoscopic surgery for appendicectomy - a randomised controlled trial.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Single port/incision laparoscopic surgery compared with standard three-port laparoscopic surgery for appendicectomy - a randomised controlled trial.
المؤلفون: Malik, Momin, McCormack, Kirsty, Krukowski, Zygmunt H., McDonald, Alison, McPherson, Gladys, Cook, Jonathan A., Ahmed, Irfan
المصدر: Trials; 2012, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p201-208, 8p, 1 Diagram, 1 Chart, 1 Graph
مصطلحات موضوعية: LAPAROSCOPIC surgery, CLINICAL trials, POSTOPERATIVE care, APPENDIX diseases, HOSPITAL admission & discharge
مستخلص: Background: Laparoscopic surgery has become the preferred approach for many procedures because of reduced post-operative pain, better recovery, shorter hospital stay and improved cosmesis. Single incision laparoscopic surgery is one of the many recent variants where either standard ports or a specially designed single multi-channel port is introduced through a single skin incision. While the cosmetic advantage of this is obvious, the evidence base for claims of reduced morbidity and better post-operative recovery is weak. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of single port/incision laparoscopic appendicectomy with standard three-port laparoscopic appendicectomy in adult patients at six weeks post-surgery. We also wish to assess the feasibility of a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing single port/incision laparoscopic surgery with standard three-port laparoscopic surgery for other surgical techniques. Methods and design: Patients diagnosed with suspected appendicitis and requiring surgical treatment will be randomised to receive either standard three-port or single incision laparoscopic surgery. Data will be collected from clinical notes, operation notes and patient reported questionnaires. The following outcomes will be considered: 1. Effectiveness of the surgical procedure in terms of: • patient reported outcomes • clinical outcomes • resource use 2. Feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) in the emergency surgical setting by quantifying: • patient eligibility • randomisation acceptability • feasibility of blinding participants to the intervention received • completion rates of case report forms and patient reported questionnaires Trial registration: ISRCTN66443895 (assigned 10 March 2011, first patient randomised 09 January 2011) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Trials is the property of BioMed Central and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:17456215
DOI:10.1186/1745-6215-13-201