دورية أكاديمية

Outcomes of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in dialysis patients: Results from the S-ICD post-approval study.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Outcomes of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in dialysis patients: Results from the S-ICD post-approval study.
المؤلفون: El-Chami, Mikhael F., Burke, Martin C., Herre, John M., Shah, Manish H., Sadhu, Ashish, Niebauer, Mark J., Kutalek, Steven P., Carter, Nathan, Gold, Michael R.
المصدر: Heart Rhythm; Sep2020, Vol. 17 Issue 9, p1566-1574, 9p
مستخلص: Background: Patients with chronic renal disease on hemodialysis (HD) have limited vascular access and are at high risk of bacteremia. The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) avoids vascular access, so it may be advantageous in this patient population.Objective: The purpose of this study was to report outcomes of patients with end-stage renal disease enrolled in the multicenter S-ICD post-approval study (PAS).Methods: S-ICD PAS patients were stratified on the basis of the presence (group 1) or absence (group 2) of HD at the time of implantation. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were collected. Perioperative and intermediate-term outcomes 365 days postimplantation were compared between the 2 groups.Results: There were 220 patients on HD (13.4%) at the time of implantation out of 1637 patients enrolled in the S-ICD PAS. Patients on HD (group 1) were older (57.4 ± 13.2 years vs 52.5 ± 15.2 years; P < .0001), more likely to be of African descent (48.6% vs 25.1%; P < .0001), and had lower ejection fraction (28.6% ± 11.3% vs 32.6% ± 14.9%; P < .0001) as compared with patients not on HD (group 2). Group 1 had more comorbidities and mortality was higher (17.4% vs 3.7%) than did group 2. The rate of complications calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimate did not differ between the 2 groups (overall P = .9169), with a 1-year rate of 7.9% and 7.7% for groups 1 and 2, respectively. The rate of appropriate shocks was significantly higher in group 1 (Kaplan-Meier analysis, P = .0003), as was inappropriate shocks (P = .0137).Conclusion: S-ICD is associated with similar adverse event rates but a higher risk of inappropriate and appropriate therapy in dialysis patients than in nondialysis patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Heart Rhythm is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Supplemental Index
الوصف
تدمد:15475271
DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.04.036