Economic evaluation of operative versus nonoperative treatment of a humeral shaft fracture: economic analyses alongside a multicenter prospective cohort study (HUMMER)

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Economic evaluation of operative versus nonoperative treatment of a humeral shaft fracture: economic analyses alongside a multicenter prospective cohort study (HUMMER)
المؤلفون: Van Bergen, Saskia H., Van Lieshout, Esther M.M., Mahabier, Kiran C., Geraerds, Alexandra J.L.M., Polinder, Suzanne, Den Hartog, Dennis, Verhofstad, Michael H.J., Notenboom, Marije
المساهمون: Surgery, AMS - Musculoskeletal Health, Graduate School, APH - Methodology, CCA - Imaging and biomarkers, Other Research, Public Health, Erasmus MC other, Anesthesiology, General Practice, Radiotherapy, APH - Quality of Care
المصدر: European journal of trauma. Urban und Vogel
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 49(2), 929-938. Springer International Publishing AG
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. Urban und Vogel
the HUMMER Investigators 2022, ' Economic evaluation of operative versus nonoperative treatment of a humeral shaft fracture : economic analyses alongside a multicenter prospective cohort study (HUMMER) ', European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02160-1Test
سنة النشر: 2022
مصطلحات موضوعية: Cost-utility, Shaft, Fracture, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being, Health care consumption, Nonoperative, Emergency Medicine, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Surgery, Cost-effectiveness, Humerus, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Operative
الوصف: Purpose Operative treatment of a humeral shaft fracture results in faster recovery than nonoperative treatment. The cost-effectiveness, in terms of costs per Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY) gained (Dutch threshold €20,000-€80,000) or minimal important change (MIC) in disability reduced (DASH 6.7), is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine cost-utility and cost-effectiveness of operative versus nonoperative treatment in adults with a humeral shaft fracture type 12A or 12B. Methods This study was performed alongside a multicenter prospective cohort study. Costs for health care and lost productivity until one year after trauma were calculated. The incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) was reported in costs per QALY (based on the EuroQoL-5D-3L (EQ-5D)) gained. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was reported in costs per MIC (based on the DASH score at three months) reduced. Results Overall, 245 patients were treated operatively and 145 nonoperatively. In the operative group, the mean total costs per patient (€11,925 versus €8793; p p i.e., €3132/0.028). The DASH was 7.3 points (p i.e., €3132/7.3*6.7). Conclusion Due to the limited effect of treatment on quality of life measured with the EQ-5D, the ICUR of operative treatment (€111,860 per QALY gained) exceeds the threshold. However, the incremental costs of €2880 per clinically meaningful difference in DASH are much lower and suggest that operative treatment for a humeral shaft fracture is cost-effective.
وصف الملف: application/pdf
اللغة: English
تدمد: 1863-9933
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::b50b42e5a7efdc0031d29a24218b339bTest
https://pure.amc.nl/en/publications/economic-evaluation-of-operative-versus-nonoperative-treatment-of-a-humeral-shaft-fractureTest(1a1a6a00-f234-476e-9903-5801fab08693).html
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....b50b42e5a7efdc0031d29a24218b339b
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE