دورية أكاديمية

What is the effect of a decision aid in potentially vulnerable parents? Insights from the head CT choice randomized trial.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: What is the effect of a decision aid in potentially vulnerable parents? Insights from the head CT choice randomized trial.
المؤلفون: Skains, Rachel M., Kuppermann, Nathan, Homme, James L., Kharbanda, Anupam B., Tzimenatos, Leah, Louie, Jeffrey P., Cohen, Daniel M., Nigrovic, Lise E., Westphal, Jessica J., Shah, Nilay D., Inselman, Jonathan, Ferrara, Michael J., Herrin, Jeph, Montori, Victor M., Hess, Erik P.
المصدر: Health Expectations; Feb2020, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p63-74, 12p, 1 Diagram, 6 Charts
مصطلحات موضوعية: COMPUTED tomography, CONFIDENCE intervals, DECISION making, RESEARCH funding, SECONDARY analysis, SOCIOECONOMIC factors, HEAD injuries, AT-risk people, PARENT attitudes, HEALTH literacy, DATA analysis software, GLASGOW Coma Scale, CHILDREN
مستخلص: Objective: To test the hypotheses that use of the Head CT Choice decision aid would be similarly effective in all parent/patient dyads but parents with high (vs low) numeracy experience a greater increase in knowledge while those with low (vs high) health literacy experience a greater increase in trust. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a cluster randomized trial conducted at seven sites. One hundred seventy‐two clinicians caring for 971 children at intermediate risk for clinically important traumatic brain injuries were randomized to shared decision making facilitated by the DA (n = 493) or to usual care (n = 478). We assessed for subgroup effects based on patient and parent characteristics, including socioeconomic status (health literacy, numeracy and income). We tested for interactions using regression models with indicators for arm assignment and study site. Results: The decision aid did not increase knowledge more in parents with high numeracy (P for interaction [Pint] = 0.14) or physician trust more in parents with low health literacy (Pint = 0.34). The decision aid decreased decisional conflict more in non‐white parents (decisional conflict scale, −8.14, 95% CI: −12.33 to −3.95; Pint = 0.05) and increased physician trust more in socioeconomically disadvantaged parents (trust in physician scale, OR: 8.59, 95% CI: 2.35‐14.83; Pint = 0.04). Conclusions: Use of the Head CT Choice decision aid resulted in less decisional conflict in non‐white parents and greater physician trust in socioeconomically disadvantaged parents. Decision aids may be particularly effective in potentially vulnerable parents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Health Expectations is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:13696513
DOI:10.1111/hex.12965