Bone Lengthening with a Motorized Intramedullary Nail in 34 Patients with Posttraumatic Limb Length Discrepancies

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Bone Lengthening with a Motorized Intramedullary Nail in 34 Patients with Posttraumatic Limb Length Discrepancies
المؤلفون: Jan Duedal Rölfing, Maxime Teulières, Jérôme Sales de Gauzy, Tristan Langlais, Franck Accadbled
المصدر: Journal of Clinical Medicine
Volume 10
Issue 11
Journal of Clinical Medicine, Vol 10, Iss 2393, p 2393 (2021)
Teulières, M, Langlais, T, Gauzy, J S D, Rölfing, J H D & Accadbled, F 2021, ' Bone lengthening with a motorized intramedullary nail in 34 patients with posttraumatic limb length discrepancies ', Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 10, no. 11, 2393 . https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10112393Test
بيانات النشر: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 2021.
سنة النشر: 2021
مصطلحات موضوعية: medicine.medical_specialty, intramedullary lengthening nail, limb lengthening, complications, Radiography, limb length discrepancy, posttraumatic, Single Center, Article, Bone Lengthening, law.invention, Intramedullary rod, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, law, Medicine, Femur, 030212 general & internal medicine, FITBONE, Varus deformity, 030222 orthopedics, MAD, business.industry, bone lengthening, mLDFA, General Medicine, medicine.disease, Limb length, Surgery, MPTA, fracture, business, Range of motion, LLD
الوصف: The Fitbone® motorized nail system has been used to correct limb length discrepancies (LLD) for several years. This study focuses on its application in posttraumatic limb lengthening surgery, its outcome and challenges. Materials and methods: A prospective, single center study was conducted between 2010 and 2019 in patients treated with motorized lengthening nails. The inclusion criteria were symptomatic LLD of 20 mm or more. An imaging analysis was done using TraumaCad® software (Brainlab AG, Munich, Germany) to compare frontal alignment angles and limb length discrepancy (LLD) on preoperative and latest follow-up radiographs of the lower limbs. Results: Thirty-four patients were included with a mean age of 28.8 ± 9.7 years, a mean follow-up of 27.8 ± 13 months and a mean hospital stay of 4.4 ± 1.7 days. The mean LLD was 44 ± 18 mm in 29 femoral and 32 ± 8 mm in 4 tibial cases, which was reduced to less than 10 mm in 25/34 (74%) patients. The mean healing index was 84.6 ± 62.5 days/cm for femurs and 92 ± 38.6 days/cm for tibias. The mean time to resume full weight-bearing without walking aids was 226 days ± 133. There was no significant difference between preoperative and final follow-up alignment angles and range of motion. The mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) was corrected in the subgroup of 10 LLD patients with varus deformity of the femur (preoperative 95.7° (±5.0) vs. postoperative 91.5° (±3.4), p = 0.008). According to Paley’s classification, there were 14 problems, 10 obstacles and 2 complications. Discussion: Six instances of locking screw pull out, often requiring reoperation, raise the question of whether a more systematic use of blocking screws that provide greater stability might be indicated. Lack of compliance can lead to poor outcomes, patient selection in posttraumatic LLD patients is therefore important. Conclusion: Limb lengthening with a motorized lengthening nail for posttraumatic LLD is a relatively safe and reliable procedure. Full patient compliance is crucial. In-depth knowledge of lengthening and deformity correction techniques is essential to prevent and manage complications.
وصف الملف: application/pdf
اللغة: English
تدمد: 2077-0383
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10112393
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::ba2e08be72b5455727a77bc0611d017eTest
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....ba2e08be72b5455727a77bc0611d017e
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE
الوصف
تدمد:20770383
DOI:10.3390/jcm10112393