Automatic Plaque Removal Using Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Angiography: Diagnostic Accuracy and Utility in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Automatic Plaque Removal Using Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Angiography: Diagnostic Accuracy and Utility in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease
المؤلفون: Byeong-Ju Koo, Jung-Ho Won, Ho-Cheol Choi, Jae-Boem Na, Ji-Eun Kim, Mi-Jung Park, Sa-Hong Jo, Hyun-Oh Park, Chung-Eun Lee, Mi-Ji Kim, Sung-Eun Park
المصدر: Medicina; Volume 58; Issue 10; Pages: 1435
سنة النشر: 2022
مصطلحات موضوعية: Peripheral Arterial Disease, Computed Tomography Angiography, Humans, Angiography, Digital Subtraction, General Medicine, Constriction, Pathologic, Vascular Calcification, Sensitivity and Specificity, peripheral artery disease, automatic plaque removal, dual-energy computed tomography angiography, digital subtraction angiography, Retrospective Studies
الوصف: Background and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the utility and accuracy of dual-energy automatic plaque removal (DE-APR) in patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD) using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference standard. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 100 patients with PAD who underwent DE computed tomography angiography (DE-CTA) and DSA of the lower extremities. DE-CTA was used to generate APR subtracted images. In the three main arterial segments (aorto-iliac segment, femoro-popliteal segment, and below-the-knee segment), the presence or absence of hemodynamically significant stenosis (>50%) and calcification was assessed using the images. CTA data were analyzed using different imaging approaches (DE-standard reconstruction image (DE-SR), DE-APR maximum intensity projection image (APR), and DE-SR with APR). Results: For all segments evaluated, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detecting significant stenosis were 98.16%, 81.01%, and 89.58%, respectively, with DE-SR; 97.79%, 83.33%, and 90.56%, respectively, with APR; and 98.16%, 92.25%, and 95.20%, respectively, with DE-SR with APR. DE-SR with APR had greater accuracy than DE-SR or APR alone (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). When analyzed based on vascular wall calcification, the accuracy of DE-SR with APR remained greater than 90% regardless of calcification severity, whereas DE-SR showed a considerable reduction in accuracy in moderate to severe calcification. In the case of APR, the degree of vascular wall calcification did not significantly influence the accuracy in the aorto-iliac and femoro-popliteal segments. DE-SR with APR achieved significantly higher diagnostic accuracy for all lower extremity segments in evaluating hemodynamically significant stenosis in patients with symptomatic PAD and transcended the impact of vascular wall calcification compared with DE-SR. Conclusions: APR demonstrated favorable diagnostic performance in the aorto-iliac and femoro-popliteal segments, exhibiting good agreement with DSA even in cases of moderate to severe vascular wall calcification.
وصف الملف: application/pdf
تدمد: 1648-9144
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::cab577233ee0566811605c53b3af94c0Test
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36295595Test
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....cab577233ee0566811605c53b3af94c0
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE